I say keep the format as is, or at least something close.
It's a lot easier for me to justify, dedicating 5 hours or so a day for an entire weekend to watch, as opposed to the whole weekend itself (as in a race to 100)...especially, when it's usually apparent after the first day who is going to win.
99 times out of a 100 the better player "that weekend" is going to win 3 separate races to 25 spread over 3 days. The sets are long enough to even out the roll's, but short enough to allow for nice comebacks.
As an aside, since Bartrum thinks that these races are to short and that they allow for an underdog to win, I say let's prove it...throw him in the ring against any or all of these guys (Archer,SVB, Alex, Bustamante, etc.) in this format and let's see who wins.
I'm sure he's not scared, and I'd definitely pay to see it!
Either way...thanks for all of the hard work!
I blew that match but I was never stuck 20 games.
How cool would it be cleary....if we did lunch together someday...I'm in your area right now, how about tomorrow?...I'm sure we could find something to talk about:grin:
Cool, sounds good. I'm free for lunch tomorrow.
Well then, call me so we can make arraignments to hook up, 702-927-5689
Glen
Well then, call me so we can make arraignments to hook up, 702-927-5689
Glen
I blew that match but I was never stuck 20 games.
I blew that match but I was never stuck 20 games.
While you're in town, could you convert my dinning room table into a 5 pocket diamond? Pro cut, of course.
If you want a real pool table, instead of trying to make a dinning room table into one....I can help you get a real DIAMOND pool table, it's only about $6,000 delivered and set up....which would cost less than what you'd have to pay to fix that dinning room table up
PS. I have a Diamond with just the two foot corner pockets....will that do?
No, I was hoping to get this
![]()
to play like a diamond.
It would not surprise me one bit because these two guys and others tried to form an association boycotting the US Open.
Let's just say that there were some multiple bets made by various people and depending if the money was laid on Shane or JA that they could possibly throw the match. I mean they didn't invest a dime into this match.
Split the 4k...2k a piece for being there and split whatever money that bookies were raking in.
Didn't someone mentioned that the final score was actually tied with all sets combined?
I wonder if pool is sanctioned or commissioned by any governing body to monitor these matters. Heck, all major sports monitor these activities.
AZ members were betting hundreds of dollars who's to say there wasn't thousands of dollars floating around while this match was going on.
I can assure many members on AZ, myself included, would act together if bigger opportunities came knocking. It's just the nature of the beast with this game. Pool players have always been a tight knit, they get closer as you rank up higher. It's how it is at pool rooms, the good players hang with the good players and the decent hangs with the decent.
These guys are a selective few who are the top dogs...the 1 percent. Why not eat...got nothing to lose in these TAR matches. These matches are just exhibitions anyways....it's not like it's going to be on their resume, that they lost or beat Player A.
When you look at these guys' resumes...major tournaments are listed and not an exhibition match.
i said this format is fine.
but its not a good format to see who is the best player
thats all i was saying in this thread.
im not a big enough name to be in this tar thing.
they need to keep the top guys in there to sell ppv.
I'd pay to watch you play and so would many others. Even if your top gear isn't quite as high as some other guys, you're a just as good a gambler - and sometimes better.
Am I the only one who thinks best of 9 sets with short races over 3 days would be a good format?
Please see post #196.
What am I missing..?
Thanks in advance..