The thing about this debate is that it really only makes a difference in one situation - where the breaker makes one or more balls of only one suit.
Take what you make does not completely preclude the table from being open after the break as it is on a dry break or if both suits drop on the snap. In other words, the only time the rule makes any difference is when it penalizes the shooter for being successful, i.e. making a ball on the break.
If the breaker snaps dry, the incoming player has an open table. OK, fair enough, the breaker was unsuccessful in keeping his inning going by making a ball and is duly penalized. But if the incoming player gets an open table on a dry break it seems unfair that the breaker does not enjoy the same benefit when he successfully pockets something on the snap.
Take what you make does not completely preclude the table from being open after the break as it is on a dry break or if both suits drop on the snap. In other words, the only time the rule makes any difference is when it penalizes the shooter for being successful, i.e. making a ball on the break.
If the breaker snaps dry, the incoming player has an open table. OK, fair enough, the breaker was unsuccessful in keeping his inning going by making a ball and is duly penalized. But if the incoming player gets an open table on a dry break it seems unfair that the breaker does not enjoy the same benefit when he successfully pockets something on the snap.