Unless you are spin-cutting a ball (hitting the rail first, then rolling into the ball with inside), or hitting the shot at a slow enough speed that the draw rubs off before the cueball gets to the object ball, there is almost never a practical payoff for using low-inside to cut a frozen ball down the rail. If you are hitting the shot hard enough to actually draw the cueball, and with enough inside to actually do something, the inside spin is working against you until it gets to the second rail. If there is even any spin left on the ball when it reaches the second rail, it can do some cool things for you (widening the angle off of the second cushion could be useful), but after you factor in the difficulty it adds to the shot and the unpredictability of the reaction (of both spin and speed) off of the first cushion, it becomes one of those shots that you can hit really, really good and still not get the effect you want. In short, the risk/reward is almost never there for it to be the right shot in a real game situation.
If you are into trick shots, though, the shot where you shoot the frozen ball in one bottom corner with a ton of low-inside to draw around 3 rails and pocket a ball in the opposite bottom corner (uh, the one maestro just posted a link to) is a fun one to learn. It does take a little bit of a stroke, though. :smile:
Aaron
If you are into trick shots, though, the shot where you shoot the frozen ball in one bottom corner with a ton of low-inside to draw around 3 rails and pocket a ball in the opposite bottom corner (uh, the one maestro just posted a link to) is a fun one to learn. It does take a little bit of a stroke, though. :smile:
Aaron