Well what would a thread be if I didn't take the contrary position...
?
You evidence isn't evidence! Perhaps pool would be smaller for that group, if there was no betting? Not a sermon, just a thought.
I understand and that's a good point. But, it's still a clear example of pool NOT getting very popular even with bookies taking bets on tournaments.
We can argue that pool MIGHT be smaller in England without betting but we can go back and look at what it was without the betting, # of events and players and purses, and look at it now and I don't think it's that much better.
That said I am just guessing because I haven't actually collected any data.
We need to face facts, pool is and always will be a fringe sport. Only one time in the history of the world was it front page news and that was before the advent of baseball, basketball, football, and soccer became huge professional behemoths.