Jay Helfert invented the internet![]()
and then passed it to Al Gore.:smile:
Last edited:
Jay Helfert invented the internet![]()
You guys can believe what you want. I was watching and listening at the time. Pat was WAY out of line! I have been a customer of accu-stats for many years and am a fan but what he did today was atrociously unprofessional. He should be ashamed
Right... and you just created the account now to bash Pat, yet have been buying his videos for years...![]()
Maybe the Accu Stats guy was just upset that he paid for an Inside Pool magazine subscription two years ago and never received it.
I watched all 3 streams. AS was by far the best quality wise.
When i heard Pat was there with all his equip costing probably 3x either of the other guys and charging $$ yet others were providing free streams, I was shocked.
Pool players just want to see "The Derby" and if they have a choice between free and pay, probably about 90% are gonna choose free despite the better quality of the pay stream. I can almost guarantee, Pat would have done 2x the business if the other streams were not there.
I know we viewers want it all but imho, this was a gift to us this Derby as im sure Pat will have it clear in the next contract that he gets no competition in streaming the tournament.
Im guessing he thought the other 2 would only show action matches this time.
PS-I dont know why a tournament would pay 25-30K to have AS at their event which i have heard before. Maybe it makes sense in some way im not thinking about?
It seems some people have legitimately mistaken the extreme sarcasm in this thread as fact.
Just to be bluntly clear, there was NO violence or weapons or physical altercations of any kind used by any person.
Pat moved the camera, without damaging it.
I know Pat, and I find it hard to believe he would attack anyone. I have always thought he is a really nice guy.
I agree. But what I would like to know is did Pat really brandish a knife and a gun with a silencer? Could anyone who knows Pat speak on whether or not he is known to own and carry such instruments? This to me seems to be the most important thing as who can or cannot stream specific events will be sorted out by the proper parties on a case by case basis. The fact that IP was not able to continue the 10 ball streaming they have been doing a nice job of after this altercation shows that who can or can't stream can be enforced and regulated. The issue of weapons being waved around seems far more important or am I missing something here? I have enjoyed much coverage from both Accu Stats and IP. Can't we all co-exist without all the drama?
I too agree with this. I was at the DCC (did not witness this incident), but to me it looked like one accustats camera cost more than the other guy's entire setup. This isn't meant to be a bash on the streamers, just the contrast that the Accustats crew is providing a professional service, with full time staff, actual full time commentators that commentate on the match, etc. The streamers are in my mind more for fun and b.s. ing about the matches. Thats all good, there is a use for both.
I don't think anyone pays Accustats to video their events. I believe what you are referring to is that the WPBA actually pays ESPN to have their coverage on TV. I don't know either as fact, but I recall reading to this affect on the forums several times over the years. (sarcasm, and that must mean its true since I read it on the internet...)
I know it sounds crazy but i have heard it from some people who would seem to know. I'm aware of the ESPN/WPBA relationship dollar wise.
Ever wonder why Accu-Stats only did Turning Stone once?
EDIT-The whole gun/silencer thing was sarcasm the author has clarified.
Nah Accu-stats and PAT is never in a bad spot with the people who do business with him
And you should get your facts straight
How many times has the Accu-Stats arena been at Turning Stone? The catalog shows only 2007 and i only remember one. If it's 2 well sue me but my point is still WELL made.
that happened to me!!!