SVB is the best player on earth

Adapted from another post of mine in a different thread .....

The US Open just completed did not have a world championship quality field.

The top four Fillipinos were not there (Orcullo, Biado, Pagulayan, Bustamante) and the fifth best Fillipino reached the final. Ko Pin Yi and Wu Jiaqing sat it out and so did JL Chang. About half of the top fifteen players in the world weren't there. Finally, three of the top four finishers from last year's US Open were absent.

The US Open 10-ball event at the Rio in July had a way, way, way, way, way, stronger field than the US Open 9-ball event just completed. Rodney Morris' win over that field is far more impressive than Shane's win this past weekend.

To be the best, you have to beat the best fields, and Shane is rarely winning when all the top internationals show up. One day he will, but until then, he is just one of the big three, along with Appleton and Orcullo.

The way Shane played at the Open (except his Championship match); he would have beaten any of the top contenders in the world. !!!
 
The way Shane played at the Open (except his Championship match); he would have beaten any of the top contenders in the world. !!!

You can't really say that. The "top contenders" are also capable of playing that good too.

Like I've said, the top 10 or so players in the world...on any given day....it's a coin-toss.

Maniac
 
What do marathons have to do with anything? I love TAR matches and buy them often but they are a novelty. You can play poorly for long stretches in a TAR match and still win, but winning the toughest tournaments is about sustained excellence in performance.

In a short race, every error is magnified and late match pressure is a near certainty. That's why we watch the Mosconi Cup. Any mistake may be the one that costs the match, so the pressure on the players is grueling. Only a few are able to cope with it and find their best games. A year ago, Johnny Archer certainly did. Maybe this year will be Shane's turn to be dominant. I'd love to see that.

Unfortunately, winning tournaments is much harder than winning one long race. To knock off champion after champion is what it takes. Only a few have it, and Shane is one of them, but when it comes to knocking off champion after champion in events where all the giants of the sport are present, Shane has not performed at the level of Dennis or Darren.

Shane will be remembered as one of the greats, but he is not a cut above his worthiest rivals today. Then again, he might turn out to be, for his game and his pedigree are still growing.
Can you show me somewhere that someone played poorly for a long stretch in a TAR match and still won?

Before you say Alex/Shane in 2008 go watch the match. Alex didnt play bad. Shane played like god to build a lead then Alex played like god to pull it back.

If you believe that someone who wins short races to 11 is a better player than someone who wins races to 100 then we have different definitions of what makes a great player.

Shane beat the consensus best rotation player in the world by 19 games. No european player will even consider playing him a long race of ten ball. There is no one on earth who would be an even money bet in a long race of ten ball.

He has won more US opens than anyone but Earl. He is not yet 30 years old.

But none of that means anything I guess.
 
To quote fast eddie felson....

Can you show me somewhere that someone played poorly for a long stretch in a TAR match and still won?

Before you say Alex/Shane in 2008 go watch the match. Alex didnt play bad. Shane played like god to build a lead then Alex played like god to pull it back.

If you believe that someone who wins short races to 11 is a better player than someone who wins races to 100 then we have different definitions of what makes a great player.

Shane beat the consensus best rotation player in the world by 19 games. No european player will even consider playing him a long race of ten ball. There is no one on earth who would be an even money bet in a long race of ten ball.

He has won more US opens than anyone but Earl. He is not yet 30 years old.

But none of that means anything I guess.

To quote Paul Newman as Fast Eddie Felson... The best is the guy with the most...

Just look at the money leaders the last five or so years and average it out, Shane is probably twice as much as the next highest person.

Jaden
 
Can you show me somewhere that someone played poorly for a long stretch in a TAR match and still won?

Before you say Alex/Shane in 2008 go watch the match. Alex didnt play bad. Shane played like god to build a lead then Alex played like god to pull it back.

If you believe that someone who wins short races to 11 is a better player than someone who wins races to 100 then we have different definitions of what makes a great player.

Shane beat the consensus best rotation player in the world by 19 games. No european player will even consider playing him a long race of ten ball. There is no one on earth who would be an even money bet in a long race of ten ball.

He has won more US opens than anyone but Earl. He is not yet 30 years old.

But none of that means anything I guess.

How about Bustamante ? didn't he beat Shane recently in a TAR match ? I do think SVB is one of the best in the world; winning a world championship would push me over big-time. But I'm already a fan of his fearless stepping up to the plate to play anyone.
 
Well, all of us better remember that Keith McCready beat Dave Matlock, so that makes him the best player in the world, in my book. :p

These "Who's the best?" threads are really something else. I sometimes think the players don't give 2 cents about what anybody else thinks, as most professional players have a lot of self-respect *and* a strong self-confidence. It is funny how we all get worked up over these threads from time to time. :o

And I don't care what anybody says, as long as they know Keith McCready is the best. Carry on. :grin-square:
 
I love watching the Filipinos Chinese and Europeans. But Shane has something special. I don't want to be stupid and try to describe it.

My wife, who doesn't play or normally watch pool made an observation about Shane during the TAR match in Tampa against Mills.

"It's not just how he shoots, It's the way he walks up to the table and the way he walks around the table, It's like watching poetry".
 
Well....

Well, all of us better remember that Keith McCready beat Dave Matlock, so that makes him the best player in the world, in my book. :p

These "Who's the best?" threads are really something else. I sometimes think the players don't give 2 cents about what anybody else thinks, as most professional players have a lot of self-respect *and* a strong self-confidence. It is funny how we all get worked up over these threads from time to time. :o

And I don't care what anybody says, as long as they know Keith McCready is the best. Carry on. :grin-square:

Well Jenny, tell him to get back out there and play again...We'd ALL love to see that...

;):thumbup:;)

Jaden
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAM
How can anyone consider Shane not being the best all around pocket billiards player. He has demonstrated in the past as an all around player. Where do I start, an animal on the bar box. How many players from other countries want some of that. Shane has won Master of the tables 2 years in a row at Derby. The only other foreign players to win Master of the table are the Filipinos. Dont recall seeing the Taiwanese, European, or Chinese taken down the all around. All these players are great but not as great as Shane in all around pocket billiards. Shane hasnt won a World Title yet but some of these world titles get canceled in the last minute. I have seen some of these Taiwanese players play in the BCA tournaments on the bar box and winning. Dont think you will see these boys step up and play Shane anytime soon. Nothing to do with could have or should have just facts.
 
The way Shane played at the Open (except his Championship match); he would have beaten any of the top contenders in the world. !!!

Maybe, but then again, he missed the eight ball twice with a chance to close out the final. Not really a great idea against the most elite.
 
If you believe that someone who wins short races to 11 is a better player than someone who wins races to 100 then we have different definitions of what makes a great player.

Shane beat the consensus best rotation player in the world by 19 games. No european player will even consider playing him a long race of ten ball. There is no one on earth who would be an even money bet in a long race of ten ball.

He has won more US opens than anyone but Earl. He is not yet 30 years old.

But none of that means anything I guess.

Shane turned 30 this past summer.

Yes, we have a difference of opinion, and that's OK. I admire you and respect and appreciate what you've done for pool. Yours is a highly informed opinion and I greatly value it, but .....

For at least my 37 years around the pro pool scene, a pro pool match has been a contest of about one and a half hours. Players practice and prepare for excellence in a match of this length and some can play longer and others cannot. Players grow accustomed to matches of this length, and the schedules and rest periods that come with tournaments having matches of this length. I recall that when Appleton played Hatch a race to 100 in Vegas (don't think it was a TAR match, but maybe it was), he noted that he didn't enjoy it. Similarly, a baseball team might not enjoy a 36 inning game.

Sports is about how many short matches you win. In a four game series with a single opponent, a team can lose three baseball games by a score of 1-0 and then win the next by 6-0. Yes, they outscored their opponent in aggregate, but excellence in baseball and in every other major sport I can think of is about how many matches you win, not your total score.

And yes, races to 11 do mean something when you play thousands of them as the top guys have all done in competition. The great ones get their share of those matches and win their share of the biggest titles and Shane is certainly one of those. As I noted earlier in this thread, I only reject the proposition that Shane is a cut above all his peers. I accept the proposition that there is nobody who plays above him and that Shane, Dennis and Darren share the top rung of pool's ladder.

Shane may sit alone on the top rung of pool's ladder one day, but I don't feel he's there now.

Thanks again for sharing your opinion and for what you and TAR have done for our sport.
 
If you had to pick one player, from anywhere in the world, and put up $100K of your money to play a race to 50 ten ball. Who would you pick? I know it's close, but I would pick Shane now, over all of the Pinoys. (not familiar enough with the other Asians to say that)
 
Shane turned 30 this past summer.

Yes, we have a difference of opinion, and that's OK. I admire you and respect and appreciate what you've done for pool. Yours is a highly informed opinion and I greatly value it, but .....

For at least my 37 years around the pro pool scene, a pro pool match has been a contest of about one and a half hours. Players practice and prepare for excellence in a match of this length and some can play longer and others cannot. Players grow accustomed to matches of this length, and the schedules and rest periods that come with tournaments having matches of this length. I recall that when Appleton played Hatch a race to 100 in Vegas (don't think it was a TAR match, but maybe it was), he noted that he didn't enjoy it. Similarly, a baseball team might not enjoy a 36 inning game.

Sports is about how many short matches you win. In a four game series with a single opponent, a team can lose three baseball games by a score of 1-0 and then win the next by 6-0. Yes, they outscored their opponent in aggregate, but excellence in baseball and in every other major sport I can think of is about how many matches you win, not your total score.

And yes, races to 11 do mean something when you play thousands of them as the top guys have all done in competition. The great ones get their share of those matches and win their share of the biggest titles and Shane is certainly one of those. As I noted earlier in this thread, I only reject the proposition that Shane is a cut above all his peers. I accept the proposition that there is nobody who plays above him and that Shane, Dennis and Darren share the top rung of pool's ladder.

Shane may sit alone on the top rung of pool's ladder one day, but I don't feel he's there now.

Thanks again for sharing your opinion and for what you and TAR have done for our sport.
Appleton didn't enjoy it cause he lost
Nothing against him I think he is a great player
Maybe the race to 100 is not for everyone
But 1 thing about the race to 100 you have to stay and play the guy for hours
You are all by yourself and no one can help you
 
How about Bustamante ? didn't he beat Shane recently in a TAR match ? I do think SVB is one of the best in the world; winning a world championship would push me over big-time. But I'm already a fan of his fearless stepping up to the plate to play anyone.

He did. Two out of three races to 25.

Only person to ever win over Shane in a race to 100 is Alex in 2008.

Shane won the rematch. So maybe a rubber match at some point is in order.
 
Shane turned 30 this past summer.

Yes, we have a difference of opinion, and that's OK. I admire you and respect and appreciate what you've done for pool. Yours is a highly informed opinion and I greatly value it, but .....

For at least my 37 years around the pro pool scene, a pro pool match has been a contest of about one and a half hours. Players practice and prepare for excellence in a match of this length and some can play longer and others cannot. Players grow accustomed to matches of this length, and the schedules and rest periods that come with tournaments having matches of this length. I recall that when Appleton played Hatch a race to 100 in Vegas (don't think it was a TAR match, but maybe it was), he noted that he didn't enjoy it. Similarly, a baseball team might not enjoy a 36 inning game.

Sports is about how many short matches you win. In a four game series with a single opponent, a team can lose three baseball games by a score of 1-0 and then win the next by 6-0. Yes, they outscored their opponent in aggregate, but excellence in baseball and in every other major sport I can think of is about how many matches you win, not your total score.

And yes, races to 11 do mean something when you play thousands of them as the top guys have all done in competition. The great ones get their share of those matches and win their share of the biggest titles and Shane is certainly one of those. As I noted earlier in this thread, I only reject the proposition that Shane is a cut above all his peers. I accept the proposition that there is nobody who plays above him and that Shane, Dennis and Darren share the top rung of pool's ladder.

Shane may sit alone on the top rung of pool's ladder one day, but I don't feel he's there now.

Thanks again for sharing your opinion and for what you and TAR have done for our sport.

Fair enough.

I just do not put a lot of stock in the tournament format. To each their own.
 
Adapted from another post of mine in a different thread .....

The US Open just completed did not have a world championship quality field.

The top four Fillipinos were not there (Orcullo, Biado, Pagulayan, Bustamante) and the fifth best Fillipino reached the final. Ko Pin Yi and Wu Jiaqing sat it out and so did JL Chang. About half of the top fifteen players in the world weren't there. Finally, three of the top four finishers from last year's US Open were absent.

The US Open 10-ball event at the Rio in July had a way, way, way, way, way, stronger field than the US Open 9-ball event just completed. Rodney Morris' win over that field is far more impressive than Shane's win this past weekend.

To be the best, you have to beat the best fields, and Shane is rarely winning when all the top internationals show up. One day he will, but until then, he is just one of the big three, along with Appleton and Orcullo.

Lee van the 5 th best pinyo lol that's real funny
 
Best what? Rotation player? Could be, straight pool player.... no way. We're all different, and if you could most accurately judge the best pool player by one game, rotation wouldn't be that game as far as I'm concerned.

Shane is for sure a great player.

Shane is the best in an all around
10 ball
1 pocket
Banks
8 ball
 
best player in the world???

why does everyone bring up that svb doesn't do well when he travels to other countries ? what about all them world players who come to the USA to play ??? I haven't seen them winning here as much as svb does.
 
NOBODY IN THE WORLD will beat Shane in a race to 100 10-ball.

Round up all of the pinoys, all of the wangs, all of the changs, all of the woos, all of the euros, and anyone else that can carry a stick. Shane gets the money in that format, PERIOD.

I'm inclined to say that he would be the favorite over any of them in a race to 100 9-ball as well.

He can be beat in short races and there are a handful that are the favorite in one-pocket, 8-ball (perhaps), and straight pool.

If TAR ever has a snooker challenge then he probably won't get there and he may not be the favorite in a bonus ball match, but I probably wouldn't bet against him.
 
Back
Top