Neil,
I made no definitive statement about the shot in that video. Do you know what the word 'seems' means?
The point is that you continue to try to use blurred freeze frames from relatively slow frame per second video of rather high speed activities to make definitive statements as though they are fact & that you have proven something when that is simply not the case.
Especially when you are trying to capture what is a 1 to 2 thousandths of a second activity along with the fact that you are trying to capture & show what amounts to the 3mm contact patch & show it on screens of insufficient megapixels to even come anywhere near close to being able to do that at those distances.
Then as usual you make inaccurate statements about what others have said so as to distort the truth of matters.
I don't know if you do that intentionally or if there are other issues in play but it gets rather tiresome when you continually do it.
May Blessings Come Your Way.
PS For those interested here is the video so you can do your own 'pause play pause play' & make your own determination.
https://youtu.be/WDGvdPR_LHo
PPS Please note that the video is titled, 'Earl Strickland Equator Hit'.