Which brings me to the other point of people being under-ranked in many handicapped events. I would say half of the top 16 were too low for their ranking which is why seemingly B players finished high. The C was a B and the B was a low A.
I've known Lukas for several years, he plays in a lot of junior events my son does including Jr Nationals, but he is A under 21, B has won a tour stop recently and C is a bit too good to be there as a B. He is young but plays well, he finished top 8 at Super Billiards Expo with a 1,000 players. They should have used Fargo Ratings, going by that Lucas is a 620 which is in the low A range, which is correct for his skill. Don't know what seat of the pants feel they went for, but it was wrong in many cases.
I don't mind handicapped tournaments when done fairly, it's too bad most are not. So far the only one I don't shake my head at is the one run out of Amazin Billiards, from the few times I played there, maybe a couple of players are too low which is not perfect but better than most others where I see 1/4 of the players being the wrong ranking.