I have owned many of both. Let's start with the stuff that is only mildly opinion. As to which will hold their value better Schon probably has the slight edge. When it comes to which will be quicker and easier to sell it isn't even remotely close and Schon has the huge edge here. Schon is very well known and has a large and loyal following and the market for Schon cues is huge whereas Woodworth is less known and the market for his cues is on the smaller side. The Woodworth does not have as stiff of a hit as the Schon does (which you said was too stiff for you), and therefore you are much more likely to end up preferring the little less stiff hit of the Woodworth which is closer to a medium hit but since "hit" is so subjective and we all experience it so differently there are never any guarantees.
Now for the really totally personal opinion stuff. IMO Woodworth cues hit and play better than Schon cues by a pretty decent margin. IMO that particular Schon cue is on the ugly side, ugly enough that I probably wouldn't play with it even if I got it free. IMO that Woodworth cue is actually a pretty nice looking cue, and certainly many times nicer looking than that particular Schon is. Plus the Woodworth has sharp points, and sharp points are always better than rounded points in my and many other people's opinions (probably the majority), so that is just another bonus on top of the fact that it looked way better in general outside of that.
If it were me and I could trade that Schon for that Woodworth I would do it in a heartbeat even if I had to throw in a few extra bucks. When you factor in both the looks of the cues as well as how they hit and play it isn't even close between them in my book but the next guy who has different tastes in hit and looks might say the exact opposite because hit and looks are all just personal preference.