Aiming Forum Succumbs to Snowflakes?

IMO, Walmart has the best jeans.

I used to wear much more expensive jeans but one day I was in Walmart looking for some household something or other and stumbled upon their jeans section. Just for grins I bought a pair of their American something or other brand. I think I paid $10.

Great denim and they fit like a glove. Went back and bought a bunch in my size.

ummm, carry on.

Lou Figueroa

That's BS, Lou! You know damn well Walmart jeans are the worst! Why do you always have to stir the pot!!?? Lol.....just kidding, of course. I did that with steel toe boots. Bought a cheap $35 dollar pair of boots at Walmart, then bought some doctor scholl's inserts for less than $20. For around $50 I got boots that feel more like a $180 pair.
 
Last edited:
AZ's policy seems to be just about anything goes when it comes to advertising and selling aiming systems to new players trying to learn the game, as well as others. When that advertising includes conjecture and unsubstantiated claims that puts that aiming system head and shoulders above all others, including yours, someone should give a shit.


Dan, please show me where any aiming system has been “advertised” on the site. If you can find it, then we missed sending out an invoice somewhere.

I have tried to make my “policy” as clear as possible, but let’s try it one more time for the bullheaded...

Just because an aiming system doesn’t work for you, that doesn’t mean it won’t work for anyone. Just like there are many different ways to run a rack, there are many different ways to aim, and I will not delete claims that a system works, just because other people claim it doesn’t.

This latest “woe is me, I’m being censored by the snowflakes because they won’t agree with me and censor what I want them to” diatribe is probably based on your recent “Ha, you can’t use CTE in an online pool game, so checkmate *****es!!!” post that I removed.

I will never understand your fixation with CTE and proving that it doesn’t work. You claim it doesn’t work. Others claim it does. If they are so wrong, then play them and show them that you are right. I’m sure any number of CTE advocates would be more than happy to show you how well it works for them.


Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
 
Last edited:
Dan, please show me where any aiming system has been “advertised” on the site. If you can find it, then we missed sending out an invoice somewhere.

I didn't mean you were literally advertising for Stan. I meant that Stan was promoting his aiming system on AZ with and selling DVD's and next a book. That promotion included statements that are provably false, not my opinion, but false.

I have tried to make my “policy” as clear as possible, but let’s try it one more time for the bullheaded...

Just because an aiming system doesn’t work for you, that doesn’t mean it won’t work for anyone. Just like there are many different ways to run a rack, there are many different ways to aim, and I will not delete claims that a system works, just because other people claim it doesn’t.

With all due respect, it has never been about whether someone can become successful using CTE, at least not for me. I know at least one other AZ member who plays at a pretty high level and uses CTE. However, "his version" that he learned from Hal required knowledge of the contact point and doesn't violate geometry and physics when described. So, again, it isn't about that.

It's about claims that are made like "100% objective" and "the balls present themselves differently depending on where they are on the table" etc. I guess it is just frustrating to see otherwise perfectly normal grown men act like children when Stan's claims are shown to be false, or at least unsubstantiated.

This latest “woe is me, I’m being censored by the snowflakes because they won’t agree with me and censor what I want them to” diatribe is probably based on your recent “Ha, you can’t use CTE in an online pool game, so checkmate *****es!!!” post that I removed.

One of the reasons I made that post, if you read my comments in another thread that was not removed, is that I also happen to play with an offset visual and by sweeping into the shot. I have no problem seeing shots on the video game but I don't know why. Maybe I could have been less snarky but, c'mon with all the crap that is thrown at me (and I ignore) can you blame me? Two or three others said it was a good topic and I should repost it. No thanks.

I will never understand your fixation with CTE and proving that it doesn’t work. You claim it doesn’t work. Others claim it does. If they are so wrong, then play them and show them that you are right. I’m sure any number of CTE advocates would be more than happy to show you how well it works for them.

You don't understand my position because I've never had the opportunity to explain it to you in a back and forth discussion. The above ain't it.

Take Gerry Williams, for example. He executed some shots and I asked what would happen if he shot them a little differently. He was nice enough to do another video and I appreciated it. I don't argue that Gerry is a great player and that he uses CTE. What I argue is that CTE works for a different reason than Stan says and what some CTE supporters here believe. It isn't that hard to show otherwise, and I wanted to see what I could see and discuss it with Gerry, but as soon as someone disagrees with Stan we become haters and get attacked. Look at Low500's last 3 or 4 posts and tell me I'm a bad influence and he's not.

I always said there would be no 20 year war if Stan had simply sold his product without the exaggerated claims. Lou, PJ, Rick and others were pilloried for suggesting that Stan had it wrong. None of them cared whether people chose to use CTE. They just didn't want people to fall into it based on carnival barker type claims. That's been the story all along. CTE works because the player MAKES it work over months and months of practice.

I've also never discouraged a new player who comes here for CTE help. For me it's always been more about the crazy claims and the people who believe them. It's interesting to discuss in a discussion forum. If that can't happen anymore, then OK. I'll be reporting childish insults from here on, though.
 
Last edited:
I didn't mean you were literally advertising for Stan. I meant that Stan was promoting his aiming system on AZ with and selling DVD's and next a book. That promotion included statements that are provably false, not my opinion, but false.

No, that would be your opinion along with a few other guys.

With all due respect, it has never been about whether someone can become successful using CTE, at least not for me. I know at least one other AZ member who plays at a pretty high level and uses CTE.

How about the pro players, top amateurs in the country and CTE players you DON'T know? Lets face it, your world is right here on AZ and in your basement. There's so much you DON'T know it's incredible.

However, "his version" that he learned from Hal required knowledge of the contact point and doesn't violate geometry and physics when described. So, again, it isn't about that.

Hal didn't teach contact points.

It's about claims that are made like "100% objective" and "the balls present themselves differently depending on where they are on the table" etc. I guess it is just frustrating to see otherwise perfectly normal grown men act like children when Stan's claims are shown to be false, or at least unsubstantiated.

There are plenty of CTE users who would firmly disagree with you and say it is the case. So IOW, this frustration that overtakes you is going to continue in many more attacking posts when anyone speaks positively about CTE and isn't to YOUR liking.


One of the reasons I made that post, if you read my comments in another thread that was not removed, is that I also happen to play with an offset visual and by sweeping into the shot. I have no problem seeing shots on the video game but I don't know why. Maybe I could have been less snarky but, c'mon with all the crap that is thrown at me (and I ignore) can you blame me? Two or three others said it was a good topic and I should repost it. No thanks.

Nobody seeks you out unless you respond with an attack or something like this right here. Yes, I have to somebody has to respond.

You don't understand my position because I've never had the opportunity to explain it to you in a back and forth discussion. The above ain't it.

So are you saying you're the CENSOR on AZB and if it doesn't fit your standards it's gotta go or be attacked?

Take Gerry Williams, for example. He executed some shots and I asked what would happen if he shot them a little differently. He was nice enough to do another video and I appreciated it. I don't argue that Gerry is a great player and that he uses CTE. What I argue is that CTE works for a different reason than Stan says and what some CTE supporters here believe.

Have you asked Tyler Styer, Stevie Moore, Hunter Lombardo or any other pros? What do you think they know that you don't?

It isn't that hard to show otherwise, and I wanted to see what I could see and discuss it with Gerry, but as soon as someone disagrees with Stan we become haters and get attacked.

Do you really think Gerry is going to be your savior and tell you what you want to hear and agree? Gerry is going to tell you exactly what Stan teaches which is why he plays the way he does. Then what are you going to do...bash Gerry because you couldn't get through to him and claim he's brainwashed also?

I always said there would be no 20 year war if Stan had simply sold his product without the exaggerated claims.

The 20 year war started in 1998 with Hal and players who touted the system. Stan's videos came out in 2011. Before Stan even got close to putting the videos out or joined here, the war was carried over from RSB with anyone who claimed positive results from CTE or CTE was even mentioned. It was the same original FAB 4 as there is now.

Lou, PJ, Rick and others were pilloried for suggesting that Stan had it wrong. None of them cared whether people chose to use CTE.

Of course they did!! Otherwise they had nothing to flame about.
Dan, you can flat out lie like no one I've ever seen. Lou and PJ were doing it with Hal.


They just didn't want people to fall into it based on carnival barker type claims.

There are no carnival barker claims...they're factual. Another lie by you.

That's been the story all along. CTE works because the player MAKES it work over months and months of practice.

Now that is a 100% true statement. It's made to work by doing exactly as taught, not by bastardizing it into something else.


I've also never discouraged a new player who comes here for CTE help.

You make THIS statement after writing ALL of the ABOVE?
INCREDIBLE!


For me it's always been more about the crazy claims and the people who believe them. It's interesting to discuss in a discussion forum. If that can't happen anymore, then OK. I'll be reporting childish insults from here on, though.

Well, all I can say is I guess YOU told Mike how THIS is going to play out. You'll be assuming self appointed powers to continue what you're doing and that's the name of this tune.

I gotta give you credit for BALLS because it really took some to lay it out there to Mike as far as how things are going to be handled in the future by you.
 
Last edited:
What are the coronavirus numbers in your county for infections and deaths?

128 in my county have tested positive, 1 death (80yr old man in a nursing home).

Not sure how important any of the numbers are. I mean, test more people and you're bound to find more positive test results. But, as with the flu, it's typically only those exhibiting the worse symptoms that get tested. The real numbers, if we had enough data to make the estimations, are more than likely closer to thousands of people being infected, which makes the extreme cases very rare.
 
An article about Iceland recently said that 25% of those tested were
asymptomatic (no symptoms). So the only way you have of protecting yourself and
family is to stay to yourself and don't associate with those that mix with other people.
Very sad for Pool and Bars but it is what it is and I'm likely finding a space and
putting a table in it if I'm going to keep playing. I have elderly parents and I won't take the risk.




128 in my county have tested positive, 1 death (80yr old man in a nursing home).

Not sure how important any of the numbers are. I mean, test more people and you're bound to find more positive test results. But, as with the flu, it's typically only those exhibiting the worse symptoms that get tested. The real numbers, if we had enough data to make the estimations, are more than likely closer to thousands of people being infected, which makes the extreme cases very rare.
 
128 in my county have tested positive, 1 death (80yr old man in a nursing home).

Not sure how important any of the numbers are. I mean, test more people and you're bound to find more positive test results. But, as with the flu, it's typically only those exhibiting the worse symptoms that get tested. The real numbers, if we had enough data to make the estimations, are more than likely closer to thousands of people being infected, which makes the extreme cases very rare.


1 death in a nursing home is low. For the most part it seems like nursing homes are the kiss of death.

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/insid...rings-isolation-7300-deaths/story?id=70225836
 
Last edited:
An article about Iceland recently said that 25% of those tested were
asymptomatic (no symptoms). So the only way you have of protecting yourself and
family is to stay to yourself and don't associate with those that mix with other people.
Very sad for Pool and Bars but it is what it is and I'm likely finding a space and
putting a table in it if I'm going to keep playing. I have elderly parents and I won't take the risk.


I understand completely. I meet 3 other guys about every other week. We sanitize the table, the balls, the rack, etc... everything. And we each have a bottle of hand sanitizer and keep plenty of distance between each other. When you leave the table you must wash your hands or squirt some sanitizer on em before coming back. We play king of the hill format, only one person allowed near the table at a time.

I suggested we should drop our money into a bucket of hot soapy water, but whoever wins just squirts it with hand sanitizer before putting it in their pocket at the end of the session.
 
1 death in a nursing home is low. For the most part it seems like nursing homes are the kiss of death.

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/insid...rings-isolation-7300-deaths/story?id=70225836

Yeah, it's a bad deal. I sure wouldn't want any of my loved ones to go down with this virus, or anyone else's loved ones for that matter.

80 years is a long life, but as long as you're healthy and mobile, no debilitating illness or suffering, another 10 to 20 years would be awesome. Older people don't do well on ventilators, and unfortunately that seems to be the only treatment option for extreme cases.
 
Well, all I can say is I guess YOU told Mike how THIS is going to play out. You'll be assuming self appointed powers to continue what you're doing and that's the name of this tune.
I gotta give you credit for BALLS because it really took some to lay it out there to Mike as far as how things are going to be handled in the future by you.
Spider....check my post in your thread of the published youtube videos.
There are secrets yet to come that Stan has not put in his published videos but will be revealed in his Truth Series. I will not reveal those in public...I promised him I would not. The Pros and top amateurs using the method know exactly what I am talking about.
In my opinion, learning CTE is like most formal schooling...the student cannot be handed all the information in one full dose. It has to come a little at a time...first things first. I cannot imagine a student in high school scoring well in chemistry without having a background in algebra or logarithms (maybe they have gadgets that will do all that now. It's been a LONG time since I had to struggle with chemistry)
Anyway, the open minded student can rest assured that no stone will be left unturned. Stan Shuffett is a man of integrity and discipline (he is NOT as some would imply, a "carnival barker hustling snake oil")....it will ALL BE REVEALED.
Regards,
P.L.
 
Spider....check my post in your thread of the published youtube videos.
There are secrets yet to come that Stan has not put in his published videos but will be revealed in his Truth Series. I will not reveal those in public...I promised him I would not. The Pros and top amateurs using the method know exactly what I am talking about.
In my opinion, learning CTE is like most formal schooling...the student cannot be handed all the information in one full dose. It has to come a little at a time...first things first. I cannot imagine a student in high school scoring well in chemistry without having a background in algebra or logarithms (maybe they have gadgets that will do all that now. It's been a LONG time since I had to struggle with chemistry)
Anyway, the open minded student can rest assured that no stone will be left unturned. Stan Shuffett is a man of integrity and discipline (he is NOT as some would imply, a "carnival barker hustling snake oil")....it will ALL BE REVEALED.
Regards,
P.L.

Yep, it's coming! In the mean time the other videos being posted should fill the void and educate those who wish to understand and delve further into it on the table if they desire. If no interest, just don't watch or get involved.

If there are still questions, the book and TS will clear it up.
 
Yep, it's coming! In the mean time the other videos being posted should fill the void and educate those who wish to understand and delve further into it on the table if they desire. If no interest, just don't watch or get involved.
If there are still questions, the book and TS will clear it up.
I remember one of the first questions I asked Stan in person (and I was confused about it) is this...……"Stan, does an inside sweep mean a sweep TOWARD the inside of the table or FROM the inside of the table?".
He answered..."The proper use of your eyes will tell you". Then he demonstrated and physically taught me how to turn my head properly (since I had always been a "noser")
You know what I mean. These are things that the skeptics and scoffers will learn (if they choose to do so) as time goes by.
Interesting aspect of that is once you've learned, you can watch the big time Pros play and yep, they're sweeping into their shots. It's most obvious with Bustamante.
He doesn't even know himself that is what he's doing....but he's doing it for certain.
That's how he learned...through luck, finding something that worked, or someone may have shown him. He's not letting anyone know though.
I smiled at a video with him and Archer as Johnny (not being a trained interviewer) said things like "in other words you're doing so and so and so and", instead of asking him open ended questions. Making it easy for the one being interviewed to just say "yes that's correct".
I recall when reporters used to say to Old Dutch (President Reagan).."in other words you are saying". But Dutch was too smart for those lamers and he'd say..."No, that's not what I'm saying...what I said was what I said". Leaving them stunned and staring off into space. But, I digress.
Regards,
P.L.
 
I think Stan has advertised his two DVDs here. And of course there's all the hype about his forthcoming book, also given frequent voice here.

I think, overall, everyone, including myself, Dan, PJ, Joey and others here have said CTE can work for some people, not because the system is inherently sound but because it just comes with traits that can help some folks, whether they understand that or not.

Here's what Dr. Dave said:

"Concerning shot-making success, a consistent and purposeful pre-shot routine can help, and having your vision center aligned properly and consistently is key, and having a reliable and repeatable stroke are all important. But if you can’t accurately visualize and perceive the required angle of the shot or the required line to the necessary ghost-ball position or ball contact point, you won’t be a good shot maker. I think these skills can come only with dedicated practice and successful experience. They can’t come from an “aiming system” alone; although, the systems can help some people be more methodical and maybe arrive at the necessary skills more quickly than they would otherwise. Therefore, an “aiming system” can be a good thing.

And while that seems pretty obvious to some of us here, there is faction that wants to insist otherwise and that's from where the eternal disconnect and friction stems. Certainly, no one has discouraged other players from using CTE if they are so inclined. However there shouldn't be a problem with pointing out fatal flaws in the system that have been highlighted in the past by those with a scientific viewpoint. You can also read some of that on Dr. Dave's website:

https://billiards.colostate.edu/faq/aiming/system-benefits/

I especially like what Mike Page, a physical chemistry professor, owner of Fargo Billiards, and developer of FargoRate said on this issue:

"If something seems to work or to help some people it IS important to many of us to understand WHY it helps. Part of this–most of us are here for fun when it comes down to it–is intellectual curiosity, but a big part of it is understanding what specific problems are solved by a particular approach to be able to incorporate and communicate those things directly and extend them to new situations."

Which leads me to this: CTE does not work as advertised.

Regardless, can some people benefit from using it? No doubt. But the science is not there and I believe that's important information that should be shared, side-by-side with the hype, despite all the protests from those that fervently believe and advertise otherwise.

Lou Figueroa
 
Back
Top