He said he had them made for him so it wasn't north of 7500 at the time. It is now.You have a Balabuska and a Bill Stroud which are probably north of 7500 for the pair and are trying to correct people who in your opinion are spending too much for cues?
That is some funny shiite right there.![]()
Did you figure that out all by yourself?He said he had them made for him so it wasn't north of 7500 at the time. It is now.
Your response to him made no logical sense though.Did you figure that out all by yourself?
Think of it relatively like what you said about him not paying that much when he had the cues made. He could have probably got cues for 20% of what he did pay.Your response to him made no logical sense though.
I'm not to here to argue with you.Think of it relatively like what you said about him not paying that much when he had the cues made. He could have probably got cues for 20% of what he did pay.
To further clarify my point , 50 years from now what do you think a 100.00 players or action cue will be worth?
nitty picky on typing and grammar says a lot about someones character.
speech is only as effective as its ability to get your point across understandably all else is wasted.
They'rethere, their........![]()
And someone here does not.Someone here knows their grammer! Smart guy![]()
“I like you Danny” “Cue ball right in the lumberyard, I mean corner Pocket”I figured a long time ago, shooting pool was communicating with the cue ball - which conveniently always does only what it's told. No grammer, spalling or butts.
300 tops for a strictly top of the line made and hitting playing cue.
ill go to 500 for some that have to add things.
anything over that is fluff, or name brand value that has nothing to do with its playing.
go ahead and blast me or agree