Perhaps I'm in fantasyland with this post, but here goes. Some facts of pertinence are these:
1) At present, about 60% of the world's population is Asian.
2) Pool is growing much faster in Asia than it is anywhere else,
3) In 2024, Asian players have won the World 10-ball, the UK Open, and the Hanoi Open.
4) Using Fargo as the measure, more than half of the Top 50 players in the world are Asian
3) Asia continues to produce a quickly growing number of top professional players
Hence, I can't help but ask these two questions:
1) Isn't it possible that Asia will become the dominant source of revenue for event producers in pro pool more than anywhere else?
2) Isn't it possible that WPA and Matchroom understand this and that's why they are fighting tooth and nail over Asian pool?
The prevailing view I'm reading on the forum is that no truly elite tour featuring world class play can exist without the banned 245 players. I'd like to think this to be the case, but I'm not nearly as sure as others on AZB. The prevailing winds in the game, to me, at least make it possible that Asia will be the epicenter of pool at some point in the not-so-distant future and that WPA/ACBS can have their day with or without the 245 banned players,
I am glad that Matchroom is pursuing the Asian market so passionately and aggressively (this year adding the World 9-ball in Saudi Arabia and the Reyes Cup in the Philippines,) because I feel strongly that Matchroom's presence in Asia will help to grow our sport.
The governing bodies, event producers, and sponsors need to get on the same page if a damaging split in our sport is to be avoided. For now, the players are powerless and remain hostages to the in-fighting, and that doesn't suit either me or our sport.