You don't have to send me home Mr. Wilson. I'll make this my last post in this thread and find my own way home.
I have nothing against pool instructors. I'm self taught. I'm a bit eccentric in my approach to learning pool, I've never taken a lesson, and pool instruction books don't do much for me. I've stated that in a few previous posts. I've also stated my awareness that traditional pool instruction is of enormous benefit to some, and I'm no better than they are.
I believe I also conceded in one post that my game would have been better off if I had taken some traditional instruction a long time ago. These days I'm an advocate of T.O.I. My criticism of Billiard university has nothing to do with the fact that some of the instructors might be center ball advocates. I don't even know who most of them are. For all I know, there are some T.O.I teachers there. Also, I don't know how many times I've stated in posts the importance of knowing how to hit center ball...So I hope that's clear.
Also, I don't know how many times I've stated in this post that I have nothing against the test in terms of a measure of one's pool ability. I'm not qualified to be a judge of such things, but it could very well be the greatest pool skills test ever devised. It has obviously enriched many poster's pool lives. So I have nothing against the test...I hope that's clear.
Here's what I have a problem with: I have a problem with the implication that this test was devised at a pool university by pool professors. I have a problem with the awarding of so- called diplomas costing from $150 to $200 from a pool university that simply doesn't exist in any way, shape, or form. Anyone can see for themselves.
www.billiarduniversity.org.
What services are rendered for $200. The test taker posts a video somewhere that is viewable by a representative of the so-called "billiard university." the representative then confirms that the test taker did in fact make the score he or she claims. The test taker is then mailed a so-called diploma that corresponds with their score. The diplomas are either bachelors, masters, masters with honors, or doctorates.
So what justification is there for charging $200? The devisors of the test are justified in believing they should be paid for their skill and hard work. That's reasonable. The representative of so called "billiard university is justified in believing that he or she should be paid for viewing the video and confirming the score. But any pool player could do that task. He or she doesn't even have to be a good player. Nevertheless, payment should be given. Finally, a so-called diploma made out of parchment paper is mailed out. That costs something. But $200
For $175 the diploma is mailed out in a PDF file that can be copied.
Things get real interesting at $150. For this amount the test taker receives no diploma. The video is evaluated and the test taker's degree status is merely listed on the so-called billiard university web site.
So let's concentrate on the $150 option. Let's be generous and pay the test devisors $30. Let's be even more generous and give the person who confirms the score $20. Why should the test taker pay another $100. Obviously for the prestige of having their honor listed at so-called "billiard university."
What is so-called "billiard university." It's the web site where one can learn about the test and take it. There's very little more. There's a store that sells 13 different videos, there's some information about a teaching clinic that will be held by 3 instructors in Colorado next July. It's 17 hours of instruction over a 3 day weekend for $850. There's also a large amount of Dr. Dave's previously released writings on pool.
That's it. There is no more substance to so-called "billiard university" than that which is stated in the previous paragraph. They expect that test takers will pay $100 for the prestige of having their so- called degree listed on this site.
So what's going on here? They are either consciously or unconsciously taking advantage of people without critical thinking skills and trying to take their money. They devised a fine test. They are presenting the " billiard university" aspect of it as tongue in cheek to intelligent people but either consciously or subconsciously they are targeting those without critical thinking skills.
They either consciously or unconsciously know these people will not perceive the tongue in cheek aspect and that these people will some how believe that a real billiard university exists where great reservoirs of pool knowledge exists and great pool minds contribute knowledge. They either consciously or unconsciously know that they can convince these people that they are receiving a legitimate degree from a real billiard university.
Finally, they give out the test for free. They either consciously or unconsciously know that if they give out the test for free and people's pool lives benefit from it they will be far less likely to be critical of the operation and see what they're really trying to do. If anyone wants evidence of all that I've said, all you have to do is read the posts in this thread.
Think about it. Do you think they'd ever call the test "The pocket billiards assessment test, give out ratings of A, AA, AAA, and AAAA, and try to get people to pay them $150 to have their A status listed at their "pocket billiards assessment web site."
I'm not casting aspersions on all these folks. Well; I did last night to one of them. I held out an olive branch to him and he hit me over the head with it! As I'm sure was noticed, many times I referred to their motivations as conscious or unconscious. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and think it was unconscious. Maybe they're fine folks and were just not thinking or ill informed or not really focused when they entered into this operation....Let's hope so!