CanadianGuy
Well-known member
UK open sucked, just a swing and miss this year
this pending World Title event will be EPIC
this pending World Title event will be EPIC
That's great news !! Thanks for the INFO Jay.
But I couldn't find any INFO for WOMEN'S tournament. Not sure if Women will be competing.
No one progresses after 20 years old. Maybe like 3-4% after that. If a player is not nationally known by the time they are 16, they won't be a TOP player when they are in their 20's.What has happened to Chris Reinhold? A few years ago when he was chosen for the MC, some were saying he was going to end up being a top american. But looks like Thorpe, Sossei, Wolford, Lombardo, Styer, Oscar, all competing for that 4-10 slot for the Americans.
Is he still progressing? Just haven't heard much from him lately.
Matchroom have always preferred to award their champions of the world (snooker and darts) with an amount of ranking points (which as we know in MR's approach equals to dough paid) solid enough to remain as No.1 until the next Worlds, literally for a year.yes. it skews the rankings tremendously. even runner up is a lock. better not be sick that week!
Well tell that to John Schmidt who started to play at the age of 18 and if you want less extreme example i started to play pool competitively at the age of 19 and so far I won 20 national champion titles,the last one at the age of 45 last autumn so yeah,i beg to differNo one progresses after 20 years old. Maybe like 3-4% after that. If a player is not nationally known by the time they are 16, they won't be a TOP player when they are in their 20's.
Well tell that to John Schmidt who started to play at the age of 18 and if you want less extreme example i started to play pool competitively at the age of 19 and so far I won 20 national champion titles,the last one at the age of 45 last autumn so yeah,i beg to differ
I started at 14 but since there were 0 good players in my town i did not get good at young age. Mostly got my skills after 35 i got back on playing after 7 years off. I consider im decent and can compete against anyone but i am not best at tourneys. I play way too seldom in tourneys.. (last year 4 tournments 2pool, one Kaisa and one 3-cushion ).No one progresses after 20 years old. Maybe like 3-4% after that. If a player is not nationally known by the time they are 16, they won't be a TOP player when they are in their 20's.
I saw FSR ran 9-pack vs Dechaine on Darrens 8-ball tourney on 2017 in New York when i was there too.. So he was pretty good way before 2021 too.FSR improved a little bit after eye surgery in late 2021.. had a half decent year after that
JJ started playing late too. and there's a bundle of counterexamples in snooker. but as a general rule iusedtoberich is probably right, especially these days
If a player like Schmidt started at 18, then we can add 5 years and that will be about his max. And it about was.Well tell that to John Schmidt who started to play at the age of 18 and if you want less extreme example i started to play pool competitively at the age of 19 and so far I won 20 national champion titles,the last one at the age of 45 last autumn so yeah,i beg to differ
But I think he is not such a good example of starting late. From Wikipedia:FSR improved a little bit after eye surgery in late 2021.. had a half decent year after that ...
You may be right about the players at the world-class level but there's hope for those below if they maintain their health and their passion. I think Michigan's Jeremy Seaman is still improving. Maybe that's more of a seasoning thing vs a true aptitude increase, but it's hard to sort out that difference at the lower levels. I'm sure Mike Page has plenty of examples of players getting better.No one progresses after 20 years old. Maybe like 3-4% after that. If a player is not nationally known by the time they are 16, they won't be a TOP player when they are in their 20's.
But I think he is not such a good example of starting late. From Wikipedia:
Ruiz won the World Nine-ball Junior Championship in 2010, defeating Jesse Engel 11–6 in the final.
He was 18/19 at the time.
In that case, I wonder how SVB's progress was the last 20 years. He seems to have no recorded wins until 2005 but then he won the US Open in 2007. I think he started playing real young.i was more referring to players progressing after 20. many players have, tyler styer is another example
In that case, I wonder how SVB's progress was the last 20 years. He seems to have no recorded wins until 2005 but then he won the US Open in 2007. I think he started playing real young.
I think (but not certain) Shane stayed within the league system until about 2005 or so. Then he ventured into pro pool, and of course had his breakout year in 2007, starting with bbq'ing Corey in TAR 1.In that case, I wonder how SVB's progress was the last 20 years. He seems to have no recorded wins until 2005 but then he won the US Open in 2007. I think he started playing real young.
yet the eurohole fanboys on here think he can't match up defensively. LMFAOeven the last ten years his defensive game has evolved to an incredible level. albin said beating shane in tournaments used to fairly easy, but it's nothing like that now
Good point, he started at 4 but it would be hard to deny how in the last 20 years he went from being mostly known as an amazing 9 ball player, into being a far more polished player at all disciplines. It’s true of a lot of players as they became more seasoned.In that case, I wonder how SVB's progress was the last 20 years. He seems to have no recorded wins until 2005 but then he won the US Open in 2007. I think he started playing real young.