frankncali said:
Its obvious that your Pro UPA so I have a question or two.
1- Why? I mean why do you feel the UPA is good for Pro pool?
2- Have they formed a tour? If so how many events?
3- Is it right for them to use strongarm tactics when other tournaments
are scheduled?
4- If they feel like the promotors of these events should have used the
UPA to sanction then why? What does the UPA offer them if they do?
5- How is the UPA proving to Pro Level players that they are behind them
and are working towards a more dominate tour?
6- How many repeated events that are sanctioned by the UPA have there been?
7- Has the UPA worked with others in the pool industry to find out what to
do to have a more marketable and successful sport?
I agree with some of the things in your post but dont feel like the UPA is the answer. Maybe it was the way they were started or maybe who started them but it not the answer to me.
Its time for players, fans, manufactures, and billiard media outlets to step up and get something done. Joe Ts post was exactly about this happening.
Either get off the pot of get to business. Even if the Pro Tour is not as big
as other sports it can be there and be successful.
It needs to be built and all people involved in pool need to be a part of getting it going.
People will have different opinions about how to get it done but I think
having discussions about it and getting pool minds together is the answer to
figure it out.
Hopefully something good will come out of people talking and bringing up likes and dislikes.
Hopefully you have some answers about the UPA because they are almost
a mystery to most. Heck most pool players dont even know what the UPA
is.
I think you have some great points in your post. Things that should be brought up.
#1. I am not Pro UPA. They seed players to avoid tough Match up's. The selection and tour point system tends to send Charlie at the expense of others. I do not know that to be true! But I hear gripping on the board.
#2. They have built a foundation on which to build. They have tried unsuccessfully in part because the players will not sign a contract to allow the UPA to leverage the names and popularity of its superstar players to obtain funding. You can not advertise Efren or Corey Duel on any advertisement. Becuase UPA can't guarantee there attendance and can not allow the use of their image or likeness to promote any event. ( A legal issue)
#3. I do not like the tactics. But, as George Bush says "you are either with us or against us". Additonally, their is a long standing dispute between the UPA and BArry Berhman and there is no need to rehash that issue and in my opinion it very well may be personal.
#4. Not much! They tried to leverage the players and boycott non-conforming tournaments. But, they can not control the actions of others or commit players to events against their will. They do list the tournament on their site and help get it mentioned in the pool publications.
#5. They have stood behind the players and again tried to leverage the players against offenders. The US Open problem a few years ago. As of today, Charlie, Max & other UPA members have not attended in protest of what happened. They could make money or even win the darn thing. But, they are not scab workers.
#6. None that I know of. But, with nothing to offer you can not expect much. They can not guarantee Efren will play. THey can not allow you to use his name image or likeness to promote events. They have very little to negotiate with. There is strength in numbers and quite honestly UPA members are small in number. They can only hope the BCA or APA will bring them under their vale and then they can use those large numbers of members to obtain corporate sponsors. You tell them I have 500 UPA members or you say I have 500,000 members. They are more likely to listen with the 500,000 members then 500.
#7. Absolutely not! The organization was formed on a shoe string budget at first and is very young. People are expecting too much to soon. Additionally, alot of doors were closed by past deeds that pre-date the UPA and go back to the MPBA. Those sponsors won't touch it with a 10 foot pole right now. Unfortunately, they were the most likely candidates because it is known as a tavern sport. So, beer and tobacco were prime marketing prospects and they have nothing to offer because of the players not signing contracts.