You're going to get yourself in trouble with the "self-Annointed forum Gods of pool" by stating that one is "SUPERIOR".i do get it but one way is far superior to the other and more consistent. your point is well taken
?BHE for inside
FHE for outside
?coefficient vs pivot point anyone?
Taught it. Tested it. Used it on the table.?
?
pj <- just askin'
chgo
BHE for inside
FHE for outside
Are you saying more squirt correction for inside, less for outside? Why?Taught it. Tested it. Used it on the table.
Yeah, but can you beat PJ on the table?Taught it. Tested it. Used it on the table.
Not saying anything technical. Try it out yourself. An old road player taught me.Are you saying more squirt correction for inside, less for outside? Why?
pj
chgo
Actually both flexion and pronation or extention and supination are being performed.As an instructor, you might want to use the correct anatomical terms. Pronation and supination are rotational movements of the forearm, which would make no sense in a pool stroke.
The terminology you’re looking for is wrist flexion (will move the cue butt closer to your body) and extension (will move the butt away from your body).
View attachment 743302
I’m guessing it’s because of effective compensation not just squirt compensation.Are you saying more squirt correction for inside, less for outside? Why?
pj
chgo
For myself, I use BHE either way.BHE for inside
FHE for outside
Are you saying more squirt correction for inside, less for outside? Why?
Is "effective compensation" for squirt+swerve rather than just for squirt?I’m guessing it’s because of effective compensation not just squirt compensation.
Yes - for Squirt/swerve/SITIs "effective compensation" for squirt+swerve rather than just for squirt?
pj
chgo
I have no idea what you’re talking about, and I’ve been using Backhand English for 25 years and am/was a Hal Houle student.BHE was used mostly when you got straight in on a ball, sometimes if it was just a tiny bit the wrong way , you could even overcome that. {meaning the natural angle to pocket the ball means the cueball must go left, but if it was not too much , you could make it go right anyway, that is a huge positional advantage!}
From some of the explanations I have read, either I am talking about something else or some people don't understand what is actually happening.
I always lined up straight behind the balls and aimed with the center of the cue at the contact point. I took 3 strokes and on the last stroke went forward either moving the cue tip to the right of center or left of center, usually at the max point of contact on the cueball without miscueing. This actually makes the cueball come at the object ball at an angle , even when dead straight in.
This meant you could go forward 1, 2, or 3 rails for position ,instead of just drawing back or following to the area between the object ball and the pocket.
I never used a good low deflection cue , so I don't know for sure if it is possible to the same extent with one, I doubt it.
Also the pockets were 4 1/2 inches or a bit more , I never played on 4 1/4 inch , I would think it can still be done , I believe most of my shots were near center pocket but less room for tiny errors.
I could never make the ball bend the correct amount shooting soft, so I always hit it the same speed and added or subtracted distance with high or low english. I was extremely accurate with BHE , not so much with FHE, which required different pivot points , the way I was shown, depending on the length of the shot. That was a bit too much for me to do, at one time.
Truer words have never been spoken on this forum. Even the worst mechanics and stroke methodology can work when practiced enough.You learn by repetition and playing till it becomes natural.
As I said in my post, it's possible I am not talking about the same thing, although whoever showed it to me , called it back hand English. I heard of Hal long probably 35 years ago and once contacted him, but it was right before he died. I wish I had gotten to meet him.I have no idea what you’re talking about, and I’ve been using Backhand English for 25 years and am/was a Hal Houle student.
- don’t have to be straight
- works on < 4 1/2” pockets
What does this mean: "timing oriented" and "horrible advice" when referred to BHE?Truer words have never been spoken on this forum. Even the worst mechanics and stroke methodology can work when practiced enough.
The problem is some of horrible advice given in this very thread is timing oriented.
Good thing rocks and stones can't be thrown through a computer screen, or you'd have many coming at your head for saying that about Hal and being a student from the _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (fill in the blanks with some nasty words) on this forum.I have no idea what you’re talking about, and I’ve been using Backhand English for 25 years and am/was a Hal Houle student.
BHE was used mostly when you got straight in on a ball, sometimes if it was just a tiny bit the wrong way , you could even overcome that. {meaning the natural angle to pocket the ball means the cueball must go left, but if it was not too much , you could make it go right anyway, that is a huge positional advantage!}
From some of the explanations I have read, either I am talking about something else or some people don't understand what is actually happening.
I always lined up straight behind the balls and aimed with the center of the cue at the contact point. I took 3 strokes and on the last stroke went forward either moving the cue tip to the right of center or left of center, usually at the max point of contact on the cueball without miscueing. This actually makes the cueball come at the object ball at an angle , even when dead straight in.
This meant you could go forward 1, 2, or 3 rails for position ,instead of just drawing back or following to the area between the object ball and the pocket.
I never used a good low deflection cue , so I don't know for sure if it is possible to the same extent with one, I doubt it.
Also the pockets were 4 1/2 inches or a bit more , I never played on 4 1/4 inch , I would think it can still be done , I believe most of my shots were near center pocket but less room for tiny errors.
I could never make the ball bend the correct amount shooting soft, so I always hit it the same speed and added or subtracted distance with high or low english. I was extremely accurate with BHE , not so much with FHE, which required different pivot points , the way I was shown, depending on the length of the shot. That was a bit too much for me to do, at one time.