Barbara said:
The resemblance I take to heart is with the ring. Just how many rings do you see like that? It was Barry's 4th such ring. And I received the cue in January, 1997.
Barry came up with the "phantom diamond" design in the butt in between the regular diamonds. I was actually going for diamonds with dots between them, like Paul's design, but Barry upgraded the design to what you see.
Sorry about the pics, they don't do justice to this cue.
Barbara
Barbara,
Even Jimbo would probably agree that this Mottey is similar in design but not a copy. Since Paul is such a good copier, surely he would have gotten the materials and arrangement of inlays right. Heck, SC's Szamboti-style Mottey passed the Jimbo test.

(just in jest....of course...so no tightwads).
Roscoe hit on a really good point. If you're making a 4-pt, 4-veneer cue with inlays, stitch rings, etc. (a Szamboti style cue) which a lot of people have done LOTS and LOTS over the years, you are bound to see cues that are VERY similar...maybe even to the point of looking like a copy of something. There's only a finite amount of arrangements with standard diamond and dot shapes where the design is centered in the butt sleeve, tasteful/appealing, and you don't have problems with the inlays turning out (i.e. on some of the old Paradises where he put the slotted diamonds in sideways....you can see where he lost the edges of the inlay when it was turned around the curvature of the butt).
Also, that slotted ring above the wrap has been done by quite a few cuemakers over the years. But I'm sure that the specs (diameter, slot width, etc.) are all a little different. We have a Tom Harris cue that was made in about 1977-78 with that same ring as yours (maple with black/red/black slots) only it's thinner. And your cue isn't a "copy" of that.
In all seriousness, that's one great looking cue Barry made for you....a SUPER nice one to have. I have always liked Barry's cues with abalone...they are some of my favorites. Keep enjoying it !!!