First post, so here it goes... (sorry, but this might be rather long)
Last weekend I was playing at my local pool hall. They have these weekly handicapped events. For me, entering the event is about getting to know the local pool scene (resentely relocated), having fun and hoping to develop my game. Having won one and lost two, I was out of the tournament. I stuck around to watch the games, hoping to learn by watching some of the better players -and at my level I've plenty to learn.
Two of the best players were facing off, and I was keen to watch the game (8-ball, btw). These guys are pretty much total opposites to one another. One is very methodical player, rarely takes any changes, nothing flashy. The other likes to move the cue ball around the table, take a risky shot now and then, etc. Both are capable of stringing several racks together. You get the picture.
The methodical player gets on the hill first. The other guy, however, is on the table and clearly on the way to running out. He misses position on his last ball, and can't close. The guy on the hill has the table and runs out. The guy losing complains about the table not playing right, doesn't shake hands, packs his stuff and leaves.
The room owner is rather angry about the guy blaiming the table. The tables are GC IV, and play pretty solid. I have spent some time talking to the owner, and it is clear that he takes pride in his business (tables are clean, balls clean, relatively new cloth, etc.). He is - understandably - insulted.
My point here - if there is any - is, that 1) why do good players feel the need to put the blaim on, say, equipment?, 2) why do we take our pool halls for granted? These establishments make it possible for us to enjoy the game. And 3) why is it that we more often critique the equipment than give credit for a well maintained pool hall?
J.S.
Last weekend I was playing at my local pool hall. They have these weekly handicapped events. For me, entering the event is about getting to know the local pool scene (resentely relocated), having fun and hoping to develop my game. Having won one and lost two, I was out of the tournament. I stuck around to watch the games, hoping to learn by watching some of the better players -and at my level I've plenty to learn.
Two of the best players were facing off, and I was keen to watch the game (8-ball, btw). These guys are pretty much total opposites to one another. One is very methodical player, rarely takes any changes, nothing flashy. The other likes to move the cue ball around the table, take a risky shot now and then, etc. Both are capable of stringing several racks together. You get the picture.
The methodical player gets on the hill first. The other guy, however, is on the table and clearly on the way to running out. He misses position on his last ball, and can't close. The guy on the hill has the table and runs out. The guy losing complains about the table not playing right, doesn't shake hands, packs his stuff and leaves.
The room owner is rather angry about the guy blaiming the table. The tables are GC IV, and play pretty solid. I have spent some time talking to the owner, and it is clear that he takes pride in his business (tables are clean, balls clean, relatively new cloth, etc.). He is - understandably - insulted.
My point here - if there is any - is, that 1) why do good players feel the need to put the blaim on, say, equipment?, 2) why do we take our pool halls for granted? These establishments make it possible for us to enjoy the game. And 3) why is it that we more often critique the equipment than give credit for a well maintained pool hall?
J.S.