Jerry Forsyth
Well-known member
I would like to clear up some misconceptions from another thread. First, you should all know that I wrote the book "Road Player" that is the story of Danny D. So it would be in my selfish best interest to see him elected to the HOF as it could improve book sales. Now, to clear up some things:
1) Nobody from the BCA "assured" Danny that he would be inducted into the HOF this year. They could not do that because the BCA does not elect anyone into the HOF. That is done by members of the billiard media. Staff members from AZB, Billiards Digest, Pool & Billiard, Inside Pool, etc do this job. It used to be done by BCA voting members but it was felt that this became political and that these members did not know the players or their skills as well as the media who are with them at every event.
2) Terry Bell and Larry Hubbard were not elected to the HOF over Danny. Danny is in the "Veteran Player" category and that category was not up for vote this year. That category and the "Meritorious Service" category (that Bell and Hubbard were elected from) alternate years. Veteran Player will be voted on in 2011.
3) One poster stated: "Everybody knows that the BCA is run by the pool print media and industry members, with the pool print media making the decisions." Well, it IS run by industry members. But the media is not allowed to serve on the board of the BCA and media members are not even allowed a vote on any issues before the BCA, so the media certainly does not run the BCA in any way.
4) This poster went on to say: "Personally, I do not believe it is done by vote, even though a so-called vote is cast. It's who you know that gets you in the BCA's Hall of Fame, and Danny should know this." Well, this is just wrong. It is done by a vote, the votes are tabulated openly at the headquarters of Billiards Digest, and the results are public. Every candidate has their resume presented to the voting members of the media and those members vote based on the resumes and their own knowledge of the candidates.
5) This same post went on to say: "Ask Buddy Hall what he's received for his BCA Hall of Fame recognition, as an example. I'm sure he's proud as punch to be recognzied by the pool print media and industry members, but it hasn't put any money in his pocket, but, gee, I wonder how much Buddy Hall being in the Hall of Fame has put in their collective pockets." And the answer is: Nothing. Please someone explain to me how Buddy being in the HOF has enriched anyone within the BCA or the print media?
Now, if you want to do something positive for Danny, bring a petition to the USOpen and start gathering signatures. Remember, those of us on the HOF voting board cannot sign this petition, obvious conflict of interest, but plenty of fans can and will.
1) Nobody from the BCA "assured" Danny that he would be inducted into the HOF this year. They could not do that because the BCA does not elect anyone into the HOF. That is done by members of the billiard media. Staff members from AZB, Billiards Digest, Pool & Billiard, Inside Pool, etc do this job. It used to be done by BCA voting members but it was felt that this became political and that these members did not know the players or their skills as well as the media who are with them at every event.
2) Terry Bell and Larry Hubbard were not elected to the HOF over Danny. Danny is in the "Veteran Player" category and that category was not up for vote this year. That category and the "Meritorious Service" category (that Bell and Hubbard were elected from) alternate years. Veteran Player will be voted on in 2011.
3) One poster stated: "Everybody knows that the BCA is run by the pool print media and industry members, with the pool print media making the decisions." Well, it IS run by industry members. But the media is not allowed to serve on the board of the BCA and media members are not even allowed a vote on any issues before the BCA, so the media certainly does not run the BCA in any way.
4) This poster went on to say: "Personally, I do not believe it is done by vote, even though a so-called vote is cast. It's who you know that gets you in the BCA's Hall of Fame, and Danny should know this." Well, this is just wrong. It is done by a vote, the votes are tabulated openly at the headquarters of Billiards Digest, and the results are public. Every candidate has their resume presented to the voting members of the media and those members vote based on the resumes and their own knowledge of the candidates.
5) This same post went on to say: "Ask Buddy Hall what he's received for his BCA Hall of Fame recognition, as an example. I'm sure he's proud as punch to be recognzied by the pool print media and industry members, but it hasn't put any money in his pocket, but, gee, I wonder how much Buddy Hall being in the Hall of Fame has put in their collective pockets." And the answer is: Nothing. Please someone explain to me how Buddy being in the HOF has enriched anyone within the BCA or the print media?
Now, if you want to do something positive for Danny, bring a petition to the USOpen and start gathering signatures. Remember, those of us on the HOF voting board cannot sign this petition, obvious conflict of interest, but plenty of fans can and will.