Teacherman said:
First, let me say that I disagree with the above. I could care less what people think of me. I could care less if they agree with me. I could care less what they post about me. In fact, I hope they do attack me. I hope they criticize.
I didn't say every one had to agree. I just said to not let the debate break down into name calling because someone doesn't agree with you. And just because you don't care what people think about you (fairly obvious), doesn't mean that everyone feels the same way you do.
Teacherman said:
At the same time, I hope I create dissent. I hope I create anger. I happen to believe allowing passion and personal challenges forces posters to think and back up what they believe with fact. Facts are needed. Facts clarify. Facts lead to better decision making. Better decision making will better our sport.
Individual thinking is something done little of in the pool world. The mob effect, and hurd thinking, is far too prevalent. In fact, it is used (abused) by many leaders in the pool culture.
And I do agree with some of the things you have said. I don't agree with the way you have said them, just the things that you said. No different than conversations I have had with Charlie Williams about the UPA back in the beginning. I didn't agree with the way he did things, but I did agree that something needed to be done.
I hold a series of events here in Arizona and I am put in the position of having to go to rooms (usually owned by people that I have known in the local pool scene for years) and ask them if they want to run an event. Some of them tell me that they don't make their money back when they run an event and they also don't like dealing with certain local players that can have a somewhat abrasive attitude (kind of similar to yours).
Most of these room owners still run events, because they are trying to do their part to grow the game and help support it. They feel that by holding events like this occasionally, then they can draw the players in long term and stay on the 'pool map'. On the other hand, if they don't want to hold an event, I completely understand and move on.
Teacherman said:
But.......
What I do think is quite distasteful and shows bias and is unacceptable is when a bulletin board owner says one thing and does another.
Now we do have an issue here. I try very hard to stay out of these conversations and this is not the first thread of yours that I have been asked to look at. I am usually pretty easy going about most users here and the last thing I ever want to do is ban a user. Many people post on here that these are my forums and are therefore based on my rules. I don't think you will find any messages where I stated this.
However, for you to say that my behavior on my boards is unacceptable is out of line. I don't think you would allow someone to walk into your room and say that your behavior in your room was unacceptable. You would tell them where the door was and to not let it hit them on the way out. If you don't find my behavior on my site acceptable, I suggest you find another board to post on.
Teacherman said:
Look at this page of this thread. His comment is post #1 on this page. Then, no less than 4 posters immediately ignore his comment.
Actually, the next 4 posts were Mike Templeton insulting you, drivermaker referring to another user's handle which had nothing to do with you, Bazooka Joe asking you a question and Mike Templeton making fun of you again. So, really your complaint is about one person, not four.
Teacherman said:
That folks, is an example of the quality of leadership in the pool world.
Not my job to lead the pool world. I leave that up to the BCA and the UPA.
Teacherman said:
I have openly and publicly challenged Mr. AZHousePRo. Is it really any different that the 4 posters who are basically hiding behind their computer and privately flipping him off by ignoring his post.
Again, it was one poster. Here, this is just for you...
Mike Templeton. Please stop insulting Teacherman!! Keep the thread on a subject and don't just throw insults.
Teacherman said:
He can now answer and start a dialogue or he can ban or bar. It's his show. But, we'll find out if censorship or leadership is more important to him.
Ladies and gentlemen................start your PM's.
No one is being banned here yet.
Let me reiterate though, just because you might have some good points to bring up doesn't mean that your method of bringing them up is a good one. If you don't want to hold a Viking event, then don't hold one. You don't have to condemn Mike Janis for running a tour where he makes a little money.
Also remember, that this is my forum. Certain people who have been a part of the forum for a long time are given a little extra slack. But in the end, the only person I answer to about how I run this site is me.
Mike