JoeyInCali said:HUH?
He has no website.
Wrong he has a web-site click <<<<<------here. Not much of a site, but contact info. Can not believe JoeyInCali blew it.
JoeyInCali said:HUH?
He has no website.
paulybatz said:One of my favorite cues Dennis has made ever and a little on the story behind it. I do not know where orange crush went, I know Si had it for a while and likely misses her![]()
http://users.myexcel.com/hughtiernan/articles/id52.htm
Dennis is a very genuine and nice person to talk to, we have been talking about his work for well over 2 years and there is always something new and exciting on the horizon.
To boot he makes one of the finest playing cues on the planet.
UGA330 said:I still am wondering what's the big deal over Searings. The one comment about look how the veneers are perfect angle is hilarious. I can see no big difference between his work and 10 other top cuemakers. WAY OVERRATED!!!! Not saying he makes a bad cue. I believe his cues are very good, but not at the level he is pushed to on here. I will give him one thing, self promotion. He has done an excellent job of marketing his cues.
Maybe seldom seen in Sun City West. But they are all over the city. You need to get out more.CocoboloCowboy said:Porsches rock, seldom seen in the desert, as we only have one new porsche dealership in all of AZ that sell them.![]()
qbilder said:Dennis described his inlay machine that he built himself. It is accurate to within 1/32000" !!!!! Most all cuemakers I know measure in 1/1000". I am not even equipped to measure beyond 1/1000". So 1/32000" kinda goes beyond just overkill in quality & precision, it's borderline fanatical. To give an idea of these measurements, a human hair averages 6/1000". If the guy is this anal about decorative inlays, then how anal is he about the rest of the cue & it's performance? Dennis simply took the next step in cuemaking, set a new standard, and it's up to the rest of us builders to catch up or get left behind. Pretty simple stuff.
WOW! Thanks.CocoboloCowboy said:A Micron measures 1/25,000 of an Inch. FYI.
That is some niffty Dremel machine.qbilder said:Dennis described his inlay machine that he built himself. It is accurate to within 1/32000" !!!!! Most all cuemakers I know measure in 1/1000". I am not even equipped to measure beyond 1/1000". So 1/32000" kinda goes beyond just overkill in quality & precision, it's borderline fanatical. To give an idea of these measurements, a human hair averages 6/1000". If the guy is this anal about decorative inlays, then how anal is he about the rest of the cue & it's performance? Dennis simply took the next step in cuemaking, set a new standard, and it's up to the rest of us builders to catch up or get left behind. Pretty simple stuff.
qbilder said:Dennis described his inlay machine that he built himself. It is accurate to within 1/32000" !!!!! Most all cuemakers I know measure in 1/1000". I am not even equipped to measure beyond 1/1000". So 1/32000" kinda goes beyond just overkill in quality & precision, it's borderline fanatical. To give an idea of these measurements, a human hair averages 6/1000". If the guy is this anal about decorative inlays, then how anal is he about the rest of the cue & it's performance? Dennis simply took the next step in cuemaking, set a new standard, and it's up to the rest of us builders to catch up or get left behind. Pretty simple stuff.
nossi said:@FAST_N_LOOSE: ?????? my gosh... "stealing" pics... are you serious? I pointed out that this is not my cue and that i saved these pics to my HD out of this forum! I do collect pictures of nice cues and if i can make people happy by posting them to share these beauties i DO THIS. Wanna call me a thief next?![]()
![]()
qbilder said:Dennis described his inlay machine that he built himself. It is accurate to within 1/32000" !!!!! Most all cuemakers I know measure in 1/1000". I am not even equipped to measure beyond 1/1000". So 1/32000" kinda goes beyond just overkill in quality & precision, it's borderline fanatical. To give an idea of these measurements, a human hair averages 6/1000". If the guy is this anal about decorative inlays, then how anal is he about the rest of the cue & it's performance? Dennis simply took the next step in cuemaking, set a new standard, and it's up to the rest of us builders to catch up or get left behind. Pretty simple stuff.
nossi said:@UGA330: I am veeeeeeeeery sorry about my comment.... maybe the word "angle" wasn`t correct, but tell me whatever you want... this cue, escpecially the veneers look damn clean!![]()
@FAST_N_LOOSE: ?????? my gosh... "stealing" pics... are you serious? I pointed out that this is not my cue and that i saved these pics to my HD out of this forum! I do collect pictures of nice cues and if i can make people happy by posting them to share these beauties i DO THIS. Wanna call me a thief next?![]()
![]()
paulybatz said:Please post a pic of the merrywidow you used to own...it had such great birdseye.
ridewiththewind said:Nossi...I sometimes grab pics of others cues that I like also, but would not post them without the owner's permission first. Some people are intensely private about the cues they may hold in their collections. Just because a cue may have been pictured here at one point, for whatever reason, the current owner may not wish for it to be brought to the forefront again....often for obvious reasons.
Lisa
UGA330 said:This is the kind of stuff that I am talking about!!!! 1/32000" for builing cues????? It is absurd that anyone would claim that kind of accuracy in building cues. This just goes to show the self promotion. I can assure everyone here that he does not have those kind of tolerances in his cues!!!!!!! Even if he did, what would be the point?????