Dennis vs. SVB Full Story- Truth From the Inside

If you think an attorney drew up that contract I have a bridge to sell ya or maybe a little prime land in Louisiana.

Yeah, that doc looks more like the boilerplate forms you buy from Office Depot and you fill in the blanks.

As far as having a notary public stamp it, that means little more than both parties proved their identities and actually signed that document. That's pretty much the extent of the notary's job.


Eric
 
The size of the bet DOES matter. The bigger the bet, the more likely more people would tune in. Of course there are also the small hardcore group that would watch even if these 2 just play practice.

Sadly to say, in the pool world, the bigger the bet (if it isn't he player's own money), the more likely there is something fishy going on. Not always, but I've seen a lot of "middling" in my days.
 
I did not see the match, but Ko and Dennis still put on a good showing, right? Was it still not a good match to watch, enough though there was no money bet on it? Why can't everyone who paid just think of it as an exhibition match (that was played just for the honor of who was the better player)? Was the stream really worthless? Did the viewers really get no pleasure out of watching the match? If it was a good match to watch, then what is the big deal? Both players played good, right?

Why cant the people who do not understand why having real money in the middle matters just accept that they are in the minority? For most people who buy the PPV it does matter whats really being played for.

It doesnt matter to you fine. It matters a whole lot for other people.

Also its clear you do not bet on matches. Many people who buy PPV's only do so because they are sweating them. Because you do not understand this does not change that it is a fact.
 
That contract was designed to bully Dennis into handing over money. French made the mistake of letting other people see it, this would never make it to court or hold water and people pointed that out so French had no choice but to get rid of that foolish piece of paper. I hope the rest of the "horses" get clear of this guy and fast.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I did not see the match, but Ko and Dennis still put on a good showing, right? Was it still not a good match to watch, enough though there was no money bet on it? Why can't everyone who paid just think of it as an exhibition match (that was played just for the honor of who was the better player)? Was the stream really worthless? Did the viewers really get no pleasure out of watching the match? If it was a good match to watch, then what is the big deal? Both players played good, right?

What they are playing for matters. The players want to and need to get paid to support their families and their lifestyles.

If they don't have enough in the middle, guess what? There is a temptation to gamble on the matches themselves. Then, if they see a gambler that is willing to bet a lot of money on EITHER side, the temptation arises to make a "deal" where the players make a bet on one side with this big gambler, with an agreement to split the profits when the right person loses.

I gambled a bit on the Dennis and Ko match, and I can tell you, if I new that it was more of an exhibition match -- I probably wouldn't have bet on it. It's just too risky betting when the players don't have enough in the middle to play for -- regardless of who the players are. EDIT: I should add...what happens when the person you gambled with knows that the match was only an exhibition and you don't....and possibly also knows that the opponent plans to sign with the same "agent" as the other player and you don't? Too much room for funny business, even if none ultimately occurs.

Sure, SVB appears to be an honest and stand-up guy, but everyone has their price. Maybe SVB was willing to play the match for 15k talent fee with door money. It didn't happen in the end, but honestly, nothing would surprise me when it comes to money.
 
Last edited:
Why cant the people who do not understand why having real money in the middle matters just accept that they are in the minority? For most people who buy the PPV it does matter whats really being played for.

It doesnt matter to you fine. It matters a whole lot for other people.

Also its clear you do not bet on matches. Many people who buy PPV's only do so because they are sweating them. Because you do not understand this does not change that it is a fact.

To piggy back on this, it's the same in Poker. Why does poker gain so much interest? Is it because:

A. the game is enthralling to watch?
B. the people do crazy things?
C. anyone can win?
C. the money is so big?

Correct answer is D. I love playing poker, but watching poker on TV is only interesting because of the amounts of $$ that is being played for. Yes, there are some interesting personalities, (Helmuth, Negraneau, etc...), but that is not the primary reason I'm watching it. While C is technically correct, it's not a reason to watch it on TV. It's a reason to play.

More money creates more implied drama. People want to see who is going to be able to perform under the pressure of playing for a larger amount of $$, and the reactions when they walk away with the cash, or lose it.

Just my $.02.
 
probably not...

Where is Eric (FATBOY) these days? He could swoop in and BUY pool.

Eric's net worth was pretty high, but I don't think he's made any money for years...He's tried a few things and may be working on some other things, but you don't stay wealthy by investing in precarious ideas (i.e. pool ventures) when you don't have a sure means of recouping losses...

I don't blame Eric at all for not being pool's white knight...

Jaden
 
The fact that people don't understand that if there is dishonesty about the money then there could very well be dishonesty about the actual outcome, amazes me.
 
Whether there IS dishonesty or not is irrelevant...

The fact that people don't understand that if there is dishonesty about the money then there could very well be dishonesty about the actual outcome, amazes me.

It doesn't matter whether there IS dishonesty...It's all about perception.

Everything can be strictly above board and if there is a general perception that it's hanky it's screwed.

Everything can be shady as shit, but if the perception is that it's honest, all is good.

I think THAT, more than anything, is why Shane decided to walk away from it. At this point, it is tainted and the perception is that it's not what it seems. At this point, it doesn't matter if they ACTUALLY came up with 250K each and played for it, the perception is tainted.

Jaden
 
Nice to see the community come togetherin this thread. Much better to read than all the *****ing back and forth :thumbup::thumbup:
 
Reading this is better than watching the match between Dennis vs Shane
as the news trickle on it becomes more intriguing.
 
The fact that people don't understand that if there is dishonesty about the money then there could very well be dishonesty about the actual outcome, amazes me.

I don't think anyone discounts that dishonesty ruins a match. I think the point is that the dishonesty develops because the funding source is shady to begin with.
 
Funny how in all of this not one person besides his brother and wife defend French. It's better all this ugliness happened and he will not be a bother any more.

Now who's gonna stream these 2 guys so this happens?
 
Good news for Dennis

Dennis and John French have voided the contract and both are going their separate ways. John is going to his attorney tomorrow to retract the contract in its entirety.


Where did you see this was voided?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Funny how in all of this not one person besides his brother and wife defend French. It's better all this ugliness happened and he will not be a bother any more.

Now who's gonna stream these 2 guys so this happens?

What about all the players and people on Facebook that said he was the greatest thing since the jump cue.
 
Back
Top