Not exactly. Look I obviously stepped on some toes, so for what it's worth I appriciate the CNC crowd, but respectfully disagree.
I do find it a little funny how insulted and insulting some of you can be over nothing. A difference in opinion doesn't mean an attack. A simple, "i dissagree, and this is why" would have been alot nicer to see. But atleast I now understand some of the types of people that are on here.
Good day to you all. I anxously await my new lathe.
-- Sent from my Palm Pre using Forums
Uh, by calling all these talented cuemakers a bunch of hacks, you threw the first insult, in spite of sugar coating.
Incidentally, if you use a lathe, by your standards your cues will never be art.
Please, accept his apology if you are a cnc fanatic.I would first like to appoligize to those i offended. I am sorry and do see the merit of CNC work in a cue. I understand the finished product is what your after, not the process in which it is made. And i would never suggest that learning how to run a CNC machine is easy. Your art is not for me.
I would like to dive further into the rabbit hole, and toss this out there. To me it seems that, CNC makes possible for some, what would be unachievable otherwise. I wouldn't go as far as to say it's cheating, but the challenge of extra sharp, even points, cut by hand should be the goal of the artist. Laying out a design that will auto cut every inlay just seems a little like cheating to me. I think CNC is a double edge knife.
I don't think it so wrong to want to pursue excellence with out assistance of computerized equipment.
Kinda surprised no responses?
Bump to the top, I am really enoying the different views.
Kinda surprised no responses?
Bump to the top, I am really enoying the different views.
-- Sent from my Palm Pre using Forums
my friend and cue maker is Keith Hanssen, of Keith Kustom Kues.
His work is amazing. NO PANTO and NO CNC.
here is one,
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=194138&highlight=keith+hanssen
and yet another beauty
gypsy queen. 72pt. razor sharp
and the hit of his cues is stiffer than anything i've picked up.
That cue has no inlays. Not a single one. It's all v-groove splicing. It's done either on a lathe with a router, or a milling machine. The actual "design" is the layers of v-grooved points. Comparing v-groove points to inlays is apples & oranges. That cue could easily be created with CNC. I'm not taking anything away from Keith, as I feel he is an awesome cue maker with his own great artistic touch, but that cue can be achieved by anybody who is accomplished in the craft of cutting points & recut points.
That particular cue requires a lot of time & patience, and a skilled craftsman to get everything evenly centered, but requires nothing more than the ability to use any one of multiple tools capable of creating v-grooves in the wood. He cut nothing by hand. If by hand you mean he cranked the hand wheel, then ok he built it by hand. But even him turning the hand wheel, the machine followed the taper it was set to & the spindle with cutting bit did the actual cutting. I'd venture to say he didn't even turn the hand wheel, that it was power fed.
If your perception of "by hand" means no CNC, then there are as many or more cues built "by hand" than by CNC. Even the cues built using CNC are structurally made & assembled "by hand", then inlaid and possibly tapered with CNC. Again, once you begin building cues yourself, you'll see things in a completely different light. A cue maker with CNC doesn't put a stick of wood in one end and a finished cue comes out the other. Therefore, quite literally every single cue on earth had some "by hand" craftsmanship to create it.
I wouldn't mean to insult your art being as art is but interpretation of any thing. I feel that hand cutting, or cutting inlays with machine that is not computerized. Cnc use more specifacally is not art in MY eyes. It is my opinion. It's not the machinery rather the means in which your patern is created. I would compare it like this. A hand painted picture vs. photo shop. Both take skill but in my eyes photo shop is not art.
This is my opinion, not fact. I am just looking to discuss. I am interested only in hearing other views, not arguing. I'm not looking for a heated exchange. I'm sorry if I insulted any one.
-- Sent from my Palm Pre using Forums
The OP really doesn't know what he is talking about at all. If you read through his posts he say in one post he has only been playing pool for about a year. I don't think he has any knowledge base to draw any kind of real opinions from at this point. He sounds enthusiastic though. I think Mr. Hanssen may be a little embarrassed by this thread if he read it. I don't suspect the OP really know what Keith does to build cues or apprenticed in his shop.Hi,
I think this guy Keith is a very talented man to say the least but something seems a little rotten in Denmark.
Question # 1:
Is this guy still living and if so does he know the things you are saying here?
Question # 2:
Are you saying that those rings are not made using an indexing jig and the billets where cut by hand and not a slitting saw?
Obsevations:
Below are some pics I found of one of Keith cues from a old thread. Notice how the pin is engraved dated and serial numbered. He must have done that with a special tiny dremel tool free hand to keep the art thing going on.
And did you notice that rubber bumper. I bet he made the molds by hand and taped the gum trees personally. Thats what a real artist would do. Not the CNC gang that hangs out here.
Now the points on that cue, probably hand chiseled with a Indian Arrow head that was perfectly flat and sharp. I think I read somewhere that he lines himself up with the north star and uses a boy scouts compass to cut the ring stitches with a tiny saw. Someone also told me he mixes up his own recipe for phenolics in his basement in a 55 gal drum over a wood fire because using natural gas would not be the same in an artistic perspective.
I think that you don't have a clue and that you are just an idiot and Keith Groupie who is try to act cool due to an association with another cue maker. Your points are a only made to put CMs here in a bad view for accepting CNC as a tool. That is non productive. IMO, Your just an Internet Troll who likes to stril the pot.
Rick
I apologize to Keith where ever he is for my humor and do not mean to cast any negativity to his talent, that speaks for itself.
![]()
Hand etched pin
![]()
Hand made molds for the artistic bumber
![]()
Hand chiseled v grooves for the points.
![]()
Ring stitches cut very precisely with a small saw to get the perfect indexing geometry.
![]()
I think this is a very good post. And you are correct in "by hand" aspect. As I've already said, I meant to say no computerized assistance.
I also think you are right that my views will change when I start building, I will still try for excellence, w/ out computers.
In case any one missed it.
I MADE A MISTAKE. I MEANT NO COMPUTERIZED ASSISTANCE. Electric ok computer not so much. (in my humble eyes)
-- Sent from my Palm Pre using Forums
The OP really doesn't know what he is talking about at all. If you read through his posts he say in one post he has only been playing pool for about a year. I don't think he has any knowledge base to draw any kind of real opinions from at this point. He sounds enthusiastic though. I think Mr. Hanssen may be a little embarrassed by this thread if he read it. I don't suspect the OP really know what Keith does to build cues or apprenticed in his shop.
Then to give you a constructive answer; building a pool cue has nothing to do with art, it is just basic to advance machining that results in a product. Design can be considered artistic but the execution is accomplished through machining and an advanced knowledge of the materials involved: one of the hardest parts to learn by the way. So, step one, is maybe taking a course in machining at a local industrial school. Tons of reading machining books and learning your tools and their uses inside and out, as well as a lot that is not found in "any" books. Then many many hours doing hands on learning and experimenting developing your machining skills and knowledge.I never claimed to apprentice w/ keith and I never said I was eperienced. In fact I asked keith before I put his name in any of this. I have been playing pool seriously for about 2 years. And fun fact keith also plays with a 15oz.
I have said from post one I don't have alot of experience. Still reading on here and learning alot everyday. I want to be ready for the challenge. Heck I've already learned alot in this thread.
I never claimed to be right or wrong simply my opinion which several on here have been more than stand offish about.
Fact of the matter is this, I am inexperienced and learning fast. I due play with 15oz cue. So what, earl plays with a 72" long 23oz monster, don't see anyone talkin smack about that. Non of you know me, or keith for that matter. I don't speak for keith, and I havnt said keith said this or that.
SOME OF YOU PEOPLE JUST DON't GET IT. THIS IS MY OPINION, NOT FACT, NOT RIGHT OR WRONG.
I am just looking to see what people think comprises "art" in a cue. I don't care what you think about what I think. I want to hear about what you think and feel about art in cues.
-- Sent from my Palm Pre using Forums
Then to give you a constructive answer; building a pool cue has nothing to do with art, it is just basic to advance machining that results in a product. Design can be considered artistic but the execution is accomplished through machining and an advanced knowledge of the materials involved: one of the hardest parts to learn by the way. So, step one, is maybe taking a course in machining at a local industrial school. Tons of reading machining books and learning your tools and their uses inside and out, as well as a lot that is not found in "any" books. Then many many hours doing hands on learning and experimenting developing your machining skills and knowledge.
You notice I haven't mentioned the word "Art" since the first line because building cues has nothing to do with art any more then machining a cam shaft. I will also mention that building a cue has nothing to do with playing pool. Many guys think because they like pool they would like to build cues, they are completely different endeavors.
Kinda surprised no responses?
Bump to the top, I am really enoying the different views.
-- Sent from my Palm Pre using Forums
Sold those Gorton panto and a small mill to Judd iirc.Regarding CNC.
Jerry McWorter started off using a panto and eventually, with the help of Thomas Wayne, moved on to CNC.
He did so, not because he was unable to use a panto properly, but because the cnc allowed him to expand upon his ideas and expedite the time in which it takes to accomplish the actual work.
Let us not forget that alot of cuemakers have families. Time expended bent over a panto, when a machine can do it, is potentially time away from family.
They can also save a man, who has spent countless hours with his neck looking down, a bit of pain.
I've known Jerry for a good part of my life and have the privilege of calling both him, his wife and her son, and their son my friends. I can say, without reservation that he is one of the most gifted and hard working people I have ever met.
The machines are the grunts and he is the architect who could also do all the work himself...