He ain't my hero.  I guess you ain't been 'round these parts in recent times. :grin-square:
If I had bet, though, I would have bet on Earl because, as a veteran player on a variety of equipment, he had the edge.  I heard that Earl used to play snooker in his younger life.  That was a popular game down South years ago.  Plus, he played on the 10-footers in Detroit when he was up-and-coming.
Older players do adjust to equipment much quicker than the younger players, and then there's Earl's experience on the 10-footers.  He had the edge.  It didn't mean it was a slam-dunk, though.
I do wonder.  Did Earl play good, or did Shane have a bad day?  Good players can't win every time, you know.  Everybody has a bad day, even Shane. 
