Hopefully without any perceived disrespect towards anyone,I'm with ya there John

.
Barring a few isolated sets (and some of those were gambling so that's another ball of wax LOL) from younger players,I'm convinced that no one in even the last 2 generations of "great" players could have handled COM-era Earl in a race to 11 tournament match with any regularity.
My notable exception would be Shane because of his break and the fact that I've seen him play tournament matches where he never missed a ball.
On the subject of old vs young,Shane might not have won as many big titles as he has so far if he had to deal with 80's Sigel/Varner/Rempe/Hall,or even Johnny at his peak.
Sigel has probably played perfect 30+ times over his career in the finals,proven fact.
If anyone alive could have though,it's him.
Back to Earl,even as good as I've seen Shane,Orcullo,Alex play,none of them could do much if Earl's gear this week catches like his 90's peak,because he'll make those tight-ass Diamonds look like a bar box and they'll think he's THE GHOST,except he gets to break :thumbup:. Tommy D.