There are many rules in place that are to the detriment of all billiard games. Look at the structures of other sports and adjustments implemented to make their sports grow and be successful. There is no feature that is more prominent in any sport than the human dynamic. It is that component that makes a sport captivating and interesting. How does a rule affect that dynamic? I THINK that should be the first consideration to further our sport.
The most important is the time limit. Matches have to begin and end on time.
Shot clock to prevent from taking chances away from the other player by dragging things out.
As long as the players are playing by the same set of rules the above two things take care of the rest.
If that break is as tough (as I think it will be) combined with the layout of the rack after the break that may be
all that is needed to prevent consecutive run outs if the consecutive run outs are the problem. If that break
becomes gamed I'd be surprised if it led to the amount of run outs we see today.
If its 50/50 on a good layout of the break rather than 75/25 a player always has a shot on the one. That would
change a lot right there but the break would still be a big factor. A weak breaker would need a safety game to
even things up. So do we penalize players who play great, kick great and run out just as much as others because
they aren't rack doctors?
When I get to thinking about it,
has the audience become spoiled? Can they not be happy unless they see run
out after run out and will they go away if that is taken out or will they be more excited when one guy runs out and the
next guy comes with a lock up safe gets ball in hand then he runs out?
Perhaps the lady doth protest too much and will be fine either way.