Jim is a terrible commentator, and that would be enough for me not wanting to work with him.
If you actually go back in the day and watch matches that are pre-Jim, and listen where they have discussions on shot selections, possible spins, how many cushions they could go by going this way or that way, you would understand that Jim really isn't suited for commentary. IMO
It's as if he lacks the insight that most veteran pool players have, so when it comes to analyzing the table and shot selection, he comes off like a Newbie/Groupie, instead of someone that knows what they are talking about.
This is not to say that Jim is a bad guy, because i don't know that and it is irrelevant in this case.
Just i could pick out RAILBIRDS i know from the local pool room, who know 100 times more then him, when it comes to pool.
No don't get me wrong.
I happen to LOVE accu-stats, and think that they deserve all the credit in the world for everything they have done for pool.
Let alone, how much i have personally learned and benefited in pool, from watching their product over the years. The pool world is forever indebted to accu-stats IMO.
But having said that, i have ALWAYS felt that Jim was wrong for the job.
Sorry to say, that Jim can take an exciting match, and make it dull.