easy-e said:Excellent points.
Thank you sir. At least someone agrees with me.
easy-e said:Excellent points.
PROG8R said:(are those amounts converted to US $$ or are they like wins that pay 50,000 yen and it is like 20,000 US?).
RED NAXELA said:Whether or not Efren got paid the full prize is a separate issue. The fact is he won it.
rossaroni said:I think that Greenleaf's era may have been more of America's heyday for billiards, but I may be wrong. Either way, Greenleaf didn't do too bad himself either.
Scott Lee said:...and Greenleaf made WAY more $$$ than Mosconi could ever dream of (Mosconi's biggest payday EVER was the $60K he was paid to play Fats on tv...and that was only once). At his peak Greenleaf was earning $2000/week!In today's dollars that would be nearly $150,000-$200,000/week! Not bad dough for a poolplayer!
You're correct about Greenleaf's era being the "heyday" of pool in America.
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
Fatboy said:scott i'm not picking on you but i dont think the value of a dolllar has gone up 75 to 100 times as you stated above, but your 100% right that he was making one hell of alot more $$$ than anyone is today. the main point is that the current champions are getting robbed by the condition of pool...
I doubt that he was making anywhere near that much. Where did the $100,000 per year come from?cigardave said:... if Ralph truly was making $2000 per week, then he was making $1.36M per year (in 2007 dollars) over that 19 year period... not too shabby!![]()
![]()
It comes from pool talk Bob. The stories grow in the telling. Just do the sums. Before television revenue you only got your cut of the gate money. How many people attended these exhibitions and what did they pay? Not that much I would expect.Bob Jewett said:I doubt that he was making anywhere near that much. Where did the $100,000 per year come from?
JoeyInCali said:The Efren I saw in the early mid-90's was as good as anyone in history imo.
I'm an American and I sure don't hate you. I think most Americans would agree with your assessment. I think a lot of the negative is being said in jest. It's the American way. Philwkgeorgia said:Ok people...are hearing what you are saying? MiKe Siegel: Huge player....collapsed after 50 years old... Earl Strickland: Huge player....Where is he now?... Nick Varner: Huge player... no news as well... My point is that these 3 american players, among many others great players of history, had their cycle and gave to the sport what they had to give: PRESTIGE. Efren Reyes is something else. It is a phenomenon. For 30+ years now, dominates the sport and million of peoples around the globe have been tought playing good pool simply by watching him through videos. And always remember: carom billiards is the father and the mother of pool...whoever plays good carom, he knows how to play pool...the little white spots on table that many of you ignore their existence -the diamonds- play a significant role of how you gonna play excellent pool. Efren Reyes is an excellent carom player as well. Remember that Efren Reyes never touched a jump cue in his life...fancy in billiards is the artistic way of playing, the orthodox playing not jumping like a frog. Like it or not, Efren Reyes is a living legend and noone has the right to say the oppposite. That is what i have to say. I know that american people will hate me but i just wanted to say what i believed...One last thing. I read a post about Earl's father's death. My truly condolenses to him and to his family.
I'll give you an example. Pick your favorite player. Got him thunk out? Good. Now..... flash back twenty years. Efren could give him the seven, or 8-6, or thirty to a hundred and bet every last penny he's got. Make sense? Ask every one of them who scared them the most when he got to the states and got "known."PROG8R said:I would have to give him credit that his best is probably better than about anyone elses best, but at that level, what does that mean? I dont know if there is a record for most racks ran but I do know that there is one for most balls ran is straight pool and he doesn't own that. I dont even know what his high run is; does anyone have that info? I dont think he owns more world titles or US open titles than anyone else, but there is a reason that many players stay clear of him. I just wish I had some of that reason on film so I could watch it. He was apparently at his best before I got into pool (maybe before I could walk). I feel left out missing what skill caused such stories. I can only compare him to what I see now adays and that is (this is just a guess) 2 wins in the last 5 years or so? In 13 years kids are going to hear how great Tiger is and besides all the super man stories there will be film for them to see it. I sure would like to see some of the comparable footage of the Great Efren. You know you got game when such a high percentage of pros list you as their favorite (considering most pros are fairly self centered when it comes to playing).
crawfish said:I'll give you an example. Pick your favorite player. Got him thunk out? Good. Now..... flash back twenty years. Efren could give him the seven, or 8-6, or thirty to a hundred and bet every last penny he's got. Make sense? Ask every one of them who scared them the most when he got to the states and got "known."
Was he better than Harold Worst?JoeyInCali said:The Efren I saw in the early mid-90's was as good as anyone in history imo.
Scott Lee said:...and Greenleaf made WAY more $$$ than Mosconi could ever dream of (Mosconi's biggest payday EVER was the $60K he was paid to play Fats on tv...and that was only once). At his peak Greenleaf was earning $2000/week!In today's dollars that would be nearly $150,000-$200,000/week! Not bad dough for a poolplayer!
You're correct about Greenleaf's era being the "heyday" of pool in America.
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
Prolly not better.Bob Jewett said:Was he better than Harold Worst?
rossaroni said:I think that Greenleaf's era may have been more of America's heyday for billiards, but I may be wrong. Either way, Greenleaf didn't do too bad himself either.
rossaroni said:Willie did dominate in his era more then Reyes, but... First off, I believe most of Mosconi's championships used a round robin format. You know that the better player will do better with this format. One bad match will not cost you the tourney. Also, many of the "championships" in 14.1 were ,in reality, challenge matches between two players. I think Efren would have won many more championships in his career if he only had to play one opponent over a long period of time. Lastly, 14.1 has a much less luck factor then 9-ball. Amongst the top players, certain tournaments are won by the person who breaks the best. One pocket also has much less of a luck factor then 9-ball and see how Efren has done playing that game. He has not done too bad playing 8-ball either!
Plus Efren is nicer then Willie!![]()
Bob Jewett said:I doubt that he was making anywhere near that much. Where did the $100,000 per year come from?
There is a story of Greenleaf earning great sums in Vaudeville, but Cue Ball Kelly said that the "shoot trick shots on a stage with mirrors" gig lasted about a week.