Okay, I see. We can see the importance of the FS on the standings which is the difference between the frames won and frames lost. The 6 with the highest negative (lowest FS) are trending to be eliminated which should be the case. The person with the highest FS is number 1, which makes sense also. Maybe FS should determine the winner rather than points.I didn't explain what I meant very well. What I meant to convey is a few lucky rolls is less likely to determine who wins the tournament. The format favors the better players because they are not eliminated as easily as "a few lucky rolls" by their opponent or playing one bad set at the wrong time. I did not mean that a few lucky rolls wouldn't / couldn't produce an upset in any given match.
Yes, there was a livestream from it the other day on Matchroom's facebook page. SVB was on there and probably is recorded on their page.Curious if Matchroom provides practice tables for the players at the venue. Anyone know?
IDK, personally, I don't care about energy or excitement. They may be important for mainstream viewership, but for me, those theatrics don't add anything...I'm in it for what's happening on the table.I don’t know how this event is intended to grow the game/matchrooms brand in regards to pool. The atmosphere reminds of that event they used to have in a basement in Qatar or someplace like that. Where everyone looked like they were being forced to participate in the tournament at gunpoint. There is just no energy to this event at all.
I think this event just shows, how difficult it is to determine something like the top 16 players in pool.Fargorate had this interesting graph showing the players that are overperforming and underperforming based on their rating. It backs up your thoughts.
View attachment 629637
It’s a young tour and the rankings are not well established. They are effectively working with a one year ranking list based on an incomplete calendar of events. I think as the top asians come back into the fold and they get a full two year ranking based on a complete calendar you will see something that is more representative of a true pecking order.I think this event just shows, how difficult it is to determine something like the top 16 players in pool.
In absence of the top Asian players (and Gorst), we see Filler, SVB, Shaw and Ouschan as the top guns, but it is very difficult to tell who deserves a spot outside the top five.
Would you bet on Kazakis or Alcaide, Omar or Skylar, Yapp or Oi and would you really bet against Max or Kaci?
Can you make an argument against He, Grabe or Feijen?
And if you look at Kelly's performance, we should put Siming Chen or Jasmin into the mix too.
I think this Premiere League is just a snapshot and we will see a lot of other players competing in coming years.
I would like to see, win by 2 formatAlcaide and Kaci match that just ended on table 2. Alcaide basically froze the cue ball on the lag with Kaci about 1” maaaybe from the rail.
Score ends up 5-4 Alcaide with 9 break and runs. Neither player got to the table on their opponents break.
So both players shot 1.000 TPAs. Anyone ever hear of another alternate-break match where all games were B&Rs or where both players shot 1.000?Alcaide and Kaci match that just ended on table 2. Alcaide basically froze the cue ball on the lag with Kaci about 1” maaaybe from the rail.
Score ends up 5-4 Alcaide with 9 break and runs. Neither player got to the table on their opponents break.
I've never heard of it happening before. Even in a race to 5, for it to happen on equipment this tight is very impressive.So both players shot 1.000 TPAs. Anyone ever hear of another match where that occurred?
The super tight pockets have also added this “anything can happen” feel to it. We’ve had a few missed 8s and 9s. And they weren’t long 90 degree cuts either. It’s good for the game when run outs aren’t an afterthought and much more exciting.Great event so far, but those who suggest that the energy is lacking due to the absence of spectators have a valid point. Both internet viewing fans and players draw energy from the spectators on hand.
That said, the cream has risen to the top quickly here, and the format almost ensured that it would. Super-tight pockets have meant that every runout must be earned, and that each player has to grind, often having to rely on their defense/kicking/jumping skills.
Absolutely! I would keep tightening the pockets until it's impressive to watch them run a rack. There's nothing more boring than watching a top pro run a wide open rack.The super tight pockets have also added this “anything can happen” feel to it. We’ve had a few missed 8s and 9s. And they weren’t long 90 degree cuts either. It’s good for the game when run outs aren’t an afterthought and much more exciting.
This particular match is posted on YouTube. It starts at about the 4 hour 27 minute mark.I've never heard of it happening before. Even in a race to 5, for it to happen on equipment this tight is very impressive.
Totally agree, but there is also nothing more boring than watching top pros repeatedly shoot balls into rails, or watching top pros bunt balls around all day because they are too scared to try to run an open table. There has to be a balance.Absolutely! I would keep tightening the pockets until it's impressive to watch them run a rack. There's nothing more boring than watching a top pro run a wide open rack.