$Million Dollar Shootout Turnout and Schedule

Fatboy said:
thats a great point Moneymaker created modern poker along with the internet(automatic sattlights). If there are enough qualifers and such there would be more turnout, Thats the problem with pool is there are 50 guys who can play and the rest of us try. I didnt realize just how bad I played until I played Archer when he was warming up for a match. We have both been playing about the same length of time, are the same height, drink Mountain Dew et but there is nothing I can ever do to be competitive with him in pool, much the same in bodybuilding, no matter how much/many roids you use it you dont have good genitics you cant compete, you can make the best of what you have and thats it! You cant train/practice in what God left out.

Three years ago I was rack b1tch for the "good" players in my area. They would just shoot and win. Now when I play them I win and they are my rack b1tch. I guess my genetics are good, that and about 6 hours a day practicing and playing better players. Will I ever be a pro, no. Will I love pool and keep trying to play like a pro, yes. It is about heart as well as skill. WHat is that saying... It's not the dog in the fight, it's the fight in the dog.

Rack 'em B

Dwight

Edit: Not that you are the B... just sayin'
 
First I'd like to say thanks to those involved for putting on what will most assuredly be a great event. With that being said, I truly want to know why the payout structure is the way it is. Why would the winner of the event, who obviously on those days shot better than all the rest of those best in the world players, only get a 1/3 of the purse. Take away the their entry fee and that person tripled their money? I don't understand at all and that reminds me of my issues with league payouts from leagues like the APA. They have upwards of $1,000,000 in a total purse and then you play your ass off to win your league, then you win playoffs, then you battle for a weekend at a challenge of champions, then you battle like crazy to win Citywides, oh and then just then you are invited to the big dance in Vegas where there are 700 or more teams and if you win 1st place you get $25,000 out of a million? Seriously thats what this payout structure reminded me of. Why in the world pay out places 5-12? Isn't "everyone wins" kinda the attitude for things like "special olympics" type events so that noone feels bad and pouts for losing? 3rd and 4th place get 1/2 what 1st does? 2nd place barely gets any more than 3rd and 4th? 1st gets 3 times their money once you take away their entry and since I'd assume almost 1/2 that field has backers won't most likey the winner just double his money or even less? I don't understand. If they just play a 1 vs 1 TAR match they have basically a 50% chance of doubling their money. If I was one of those world class players I can't imagine wanting anything more than payouts for Win Place and Show. Something like

1st - 35,000
2nd - 15,000
3rd - 10,000

If they are going to pay out 5-12th 1,000 each why not just make the entry 1,000 less and not pay them? I'm confused so let the flaming begin, I just don't think these payouts are all that exciting. Very happy the event is taking place but someone help me out. Oh and to be honest, when I first heard of this tourney I honestly thought it was going to be winner take all. To me that's much more exciting
 
Fatboy said:
I didnt realize just how bad I played until I played Archer when he was warming up for a match. We have both been playing about the same length of time, are the same height, drink Mountain Dew et but there is nothing I can ever do to be competitive with him in pool,.... no matter how much/many roids you use it you dont have good genitics you cant compete

So, Archer is on roids?:rolleyes:
 
jimmy-leggs said:
$5000 is not alot considering what they could come away with for taking that chance.


but the problem is they have no chance, it aint like poker where you can suck out on the river with 2 outs in the deck, an average B player might win 3 out of 20 games playing SVB, anyone can beat Johnny Chan playing poker by going all-in and sucking out. Its 2 totally different skill sets and the dynamics of pool favors the stronger player alot more than it does in poker.
 
Black-Balled said:
He's not very good at it, if he is...


hey man go easy on him he has 9" bicepts now, :D :D :D :p :p

yup i turned Archer into a roid head, blame me for it, he will come out all jacked up on the juice and do what cory couldnt manage to do last week, :grin: :grin:
 
Fatboy said:
hey man go easy on him he has 9" bicepts now, :D :D :D :p :p

yup i turned Archer into a roid head, blame me for it, he will come out all jacked up on the juice and do what cory couldnt manage to do last week, :grin: :grin:

He's gonna be fighting and stuff now. I don't think Melanie is going to like that.
 
Neil said:
Read my post above yours. They tried to get sat. tournaments going for this. The public fell through. With all places paid, everyone CAN make money if the public does their part in getting this going.


I must have been typing while you were typing...

That at least makes some sense of why they did it that way.
 
only 12 players after 1 year of promotion is dissapointing, and what happened to the qualifiers?

In any case, 4 out of the 12 will make money so that's good, the caliber of players is world class, the format is great, and hopefully this thing just gets bigger every year
 
The fact is, the tournament happened. Nothing was taken from the entry fees. 100% payout. If there had been 32 players, the tournament payouts could have been pretty good. Hopefully players/room owners/backers seeing this will prepare for next year. Qualifiers or even entry purchased tours are the only way I see this succeeding until there are a couple more years of solid turnouts. Pool players like to see the money and backers especially. I feel confident that if first place reaches $60,000 many more players/backers will throw the money in.
 
Kudos to Hopkins for trying to change the sport, running it when he said he would, paying out what he said he would and not taking a penny out of the entry fees.

Hopkins and all the sponsors involved like Diamond and the Laser Rack spent alot of money on this and its all coming out of their pockets. They deserves alot of thanks for doing this and the negativity I see in this thread is not productive and is a slap in the face for what Hopkins and the sponsors are trying to do.
 
iba7467 said:
The fact is, the tournament happened. Nothing was taken from the entry fees. 100% payout. If there had been 32 players, the tournament payouts could have been pretty good. Hopefully players/room owners/backers seeing this will prepare for next year. Qualifiers or even entry purchased tours are the only way I see this succeeding until there are a couple more years of solid turnouts. Pool players like to see the money and backers especially. I feel confident that if first place reaches $60,000 many more players/backers will throw the money in.
Kudos to Hopkins for the effort. Many thanks to him for all he's done for the pool world.

But the reality is still real: the payout is higher simply because the entry fee went up. And the price point for entry is an order of magnitude higher than virtually any other tournament going today.

The US open is around $500 and they are packed every year. DCC is $150(+$100 buyback) and the field is out of control. Other regional and local $100 tournaments have huge fields. But what was the last tournament anyone saw with a $1000 entry? Much less $5000. You may get a full ring game at $1000, but honestly, a full tournament?

It will take a serious amount of marketing and a dramatic change in public AND player perception to make a $5000 entry acceptable. I really hope this thing works out, but IMO increasing payouts on the backs of the players isn't going to change the world. And, virtually no joe-shmoe is going to put his $5000 on the line to get a lesson. He might put $500 though.

-td
 
$1,000,000 Shootout

Props to Allen and Allen Jr, Diamond, Laser Rack, TAR, and all the players and their backers, and everyone who is busting their butt to make this event happen. You all are part of something that could change the sport. Props to John Barton and everyone else on this thread who are looking at the big picture. Give this a chance and support it, guys. This may become what the IPT wished it could if it had had the right leadership.
 
o2bacs said:
First I'd like to say thanks to those involved for putting on what will most assuredly be a great event. With that being said, I truly want to know why the payout structure is the way it is. Why would the winner of the event, who obviously on those days shot better than all the rest of those best in the world players, only get a 1/3 of the purse. Take away the their entry fee and that person tripled their money? I don't understand at all and that reminds me of my issues with league payouts from leagues like the APA. They have upwards of $1,000,000 in a total purse and then you play your ass off to win your league, then you win playoffs, then you battle for a weekend at a challenge of champions, then you battle like crazy to win Citywides, oh and then just then you are invited to the big dance in Vegas where there are 700 or more teams and if you win 1st place you get $25,000 out of a million? Seriously thats what this payout structure reminded me of. Why in the world pay out places 5-12? Isn't "everyone wins" kinda the attitude for things like "special olympics" type events so that noone feels bad and pouts for losing? 3rd and 4th place get 1/2 what 1st does? 2nd place barely gets any more than 3rd and 4th? 1st gets 3 times their money once you take away their entry and since I'd assume almost 1/2 that field has backers won't most likey the winner just double his money or even less? I don't understand. If they just play a 1 vs 1 TAR match they have basically a 50% chance of doubling their money. If I was one of those world class players I can't imagine wanting anything more than payouts for Win Place and Show. Something like

1st - 35,000
2nd - 15,000
3rd - 10,000

If they are going to pay out 5-12th 1,000 each why not just make the entry 1,000 less and not pay them? I'm confused so let the flaming begin, I just don't think these payouts are all that exciting. Very happy the event is taking place but someone help me out. Oh and to be honest, when I first heard of this tourney I honestly thought it was going to be winner take all. To me that's much more exciting


OK, I will try to explain this... yes, it is not as exciting as it could sound, however, it does ensure that each player will earn some money for their efforts. As said before, these are all great players, no one is a favorite to win. We want all the players to start earning good money, not just the winner. if the day comes where a world class player can go to an event, play his best, and still earn 10-15K for 6-8 place, then we will have succeeded. It is a shame that many players do not go to events because they feel they cannot win, and the prize money is no good further down the line.

If a player posts $500 for entry, plays great all weekend, and finishes in 6-8, he might take home $2000. OK, great, $1500 profit for 4 days of play, forget about travel, food , hotel, etc... But now, the same player posts $5000 and comes to play, places 6-8, but takes home $20,000. That's $15,000 profit for 4 days. Its the same percentages, but a much nicer payday. And now that player has some extra ammo to go to a few more events like this...

And yes, the APA requires lots of work and effort to reach the National Event - and win it... the difference is, our event is 4 days long, and there are not 1000's of people in it - there are 12. If there were 1000's of players, the prize money would be well worth playing for. Based on our format, with 1000 players, 5-8th place alone would pay $125,000. And winning it? Just a measely $750,000 (for your $5000 investment, or less if you satellite in). In our format, with 1000 players, you would get your $25,000 payday somewhere around 150th place or so (I havent done the math).

So yes, it would be more exciting for a winner take all event, but the players cant afford that right now. They can barely afford an event where they are assured to come and earn some decent money for not winning. We just proved that. The reason we pay all places $1000 minimum is because if anyone won a satellite, we want them to be assured of earning money for coming. True, no one this year won their way in via satellite, but we kept our end of the deal. We promised that everyone would get at least $1000, and they are. Yes, it's not as glamorous, but it might be in 5 years when 200 "amateurs" win their way into this event for $100, and when 200 amateurs win their way in for $100, you can bet big money that lots of the worlds best players will pony up $5K to play in that event.

It is a shame we didn't get more players. If I played as good as some of the guys out there, I would have begged, borrowed, or stole money to get in this event. The entry fee structure is like poker, but the play is not... thats what makes this great. If you know, or think, or believe, that you are the best, and you can win, this is where you should be. Where are all the guys that claim to be the best? This format allows you to play, and show your skill, and come out on top through your ability - not luck. No lucky race to 7 or 9. These players are ALL PLAYING 150 GAMES before ANYONE is cut.

Anyhow, hope this helps... there are some great matches going on here, everyone that can should come watch or check it out on theactionreport.com
 
Oh yeah, I meant to mention this too... there deserves to be some sort of magnitude between playing with the world's best and playing with some local joes. No disrespect to anyone, but you can't just saunter over to the golf course, plunk down $200 and play in a tourney with Tiger. Not all, but some pool tournaments should be a "premium event". Yes, its great that so many tournaments are so accessible to so many people, but the top pros should have events that regular payers have a tough time getting into. A short race to 5 or 7 allows more players a chance to win, thus diminishing the ability of a world class pro. Longer races and more time to play will more clearly define the dominant player... and these competetions should reward the better player...
 
allen_jr said:
Oh yeah, I meant to mention this too... there deserves to be some sort of magnitude between playing with the world's best and playing with some local joes. No disrespect to anyone, but you can't just saunter over to the golf course, plunk down $200 and play in a tourney with Tiger. Not all, but some pool tournaments should be a "premium event". Yes, its great that so many tournaments are so accessible to so many people, but the top pros should have events that regular payers have a tough time getting into. A short race to 5 or 7 allows more players a chance to win, thus diminishing the ability of a world class pro. Longer races and more time to play will more clearly define the dominant player... and these competetions should reward the better player...

So what are the pay outs with 12 players?
 
12 players, total prizepool $60,000:
1st: $20,000
2nd: $12,000
3rd/4th: $10,000
5-12th: $1000 each
 
Back
Top