corvette1340 said:I like that team. Earl probably isn't in the top 20 in the US anymore and Jeremy shouldnt have been on the team either. I'd also take a look at Corey and Gabe. Given the right circumstance, they both have a lot of fire and heart, but as you say, the chemistry hasn't been there during the last 2 years.
worriedbeef said:shane is arguably the best player in the world right now... (
RED NAXELA said:
SHANE didn't have a bad year. He and Rodney won this year's World Cup.
He was arguably the best player in 2006 and 2007, but based on form and results this year, MIKA is the best player in the world right now.
JAM said:As such, the continual blame of Earl Strickland for losing is getting old. Sorry, but that is my opinion.
sjm said:That's not really my point. I am not blaming Earl for losing. Earl was selected and he went to Malta and did his very best, which is all we can ask of him.
If you widely surveyed any of the pool media, American pool fans, American professional pool players, or foreign professional pool players on the matter of who the best American pool players are today, I feel strongly that not even one of those surveys would rate Strickland among America's five best, or even one of its ten best.
Hence, I feel justified in stating that America didn't "take it's best shot" at a 2008 European team we all knew would be extremely difficult to beat.
Perhaps Earl, as a drawing card, is indispensable to Matchroom, but if so, the quality of the play is, at least to some extent, compromised by his presence. Nobody questions whether Earl is good theater -- it's established fact. I guess I'm just a purist who wants to know whether we can beat the team of European superstars if we field our best possible team.
9 ball said:Props to Earl for the way he played over the 4 days, he had a post match interview on sky sports here in the uk after the first day's play was over and he looked extremely relaxed and focused, the only thing I will say is directed to that idiot fan who got him riled up, what I would like to know is are you happy with the fact that you cost the US the chance at winning the cup for the 12th time because you managed to get into Earls head space....
JAM said:Usually, the Europeans throw things in the ring where the TV table is, while their counterparts are stomping their feet, screaming at the top of their lungs, and blowing air horns.
Of course, if the Americans exhibited this behavior, the anti-American contituency of European fierce wild dogs would rip 'em apart if they even so much as twitched while in the TV table arena.
whitewolf said:I was talking about Mika's antics, then you changed the subject.![]()
Like I have said before, I have seen some sharking antics from you know who. You need to chill - Mika is a fine person.
sjm said:That's not really my point. I am not blaming Earl for losing. Earl was selected and he went to Malta and did his very best, which is all we can ask of him.
If you widely surveyed any of the pool media, American pool fans, American professional pool players, or foreign professional pool players on the matter of who the best American pool players are today, I feel strongly that not even one of those surveys would rate Strickland among America's five best, or even one of its ten best.
Hence, I feel justified in stating that America didn't "take it's best shot" at a 2008 European team we all knew would be extremely difficult to beat.
Perhaps Earl, as a drawing card, is indispensable to Matchroom, but if so, the quality of the play is, at least to some extent, compromised by his presence. Nobody questions whether Earl is good theater -- it's established fact. I guess I'm just a purist who wants to know whether we can beat the team of European superstars if we field our best possible team.
shir said:Oh Rick?
Tried to tell Earl about you wishing him luck but he wasn't in the mood to be spoken to by anybody I think....
Sorry...