Dammit, agent skip.
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
If you want to see a plan then you will see the plan everywhere you look.But everything bad that happens to him is the result of the Plan.
Very funny Danny. Two days ago you sent me an apology and today I see this. This only furthers my feelings about you and your sanity. I hope you get the help you obviously need.
To respond to the above post, which I probably should just ignore coming from you. Me and me alone offered $10,000 for a complete unedited video of anyone running over 526 balls at Straight Pool. All I asked for in return was the complete rights to the video.
You could have jumped on that one yourself if you truly believed you were capable of such a run. Fatboy was not involved in my offer in any way! At no time did I ever say anything about flying to the room or inspecting the table. For whatever reason you felt the need to add that on your own.
As far as the rest of your post, it sounds like the mutterings of a fool, pretty much all incoherent nonsense. The only thing I smell is coming from you. And it stinks to high heaven!
Is Chicago’s pizza better than NYC’S?
:duck:
Shut your filthy mouth.
Eric
Is Chicago’s pizza better than NYC’S?
:duck:
I keep reading though this long-ass thread to see if anything of significance is ever posted and I haven't found anything yet.
FWIW, WGAF if he ran 626 or 969?
I DON'T.
I'm just one of the people who will still say, "he didn't beat Mosconi's 526 under the same set of circumstances and using the same type of equipment."
He may have ran 626 and that is fine with me. Good job. I have no problem crediting him with running 626, but I don't consider it to be breaking Mosconi's record. It is a "different" record under different conditions.
This question was asked earlier- not of you- and I don't believe it got a response.I keep reading though this long-ass thread to see if anything of significance is ever posted and I haven't found anything yet.
FWIW, WGAF if he ran 626 or 969?
I DON'T.
I'm just one of the people who will still say, "he didn't beat Mosconi's 526 under the same set of circumstances and using the same type of equipment."
He may have ran 626 and that is fine with me. Good job. I have no problem crediting him with running 626, but I don't consider it to be breaking Mosconi's record. It is a "different" record under different conditions.
Right just like the vast majority of all sports records that have been broken
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This question was asked earlier- not of you- and I don't believe it got a response.
If a record needs to be broken under the same conditions it was sett, is it really a record? It would not be possible to exactly replicate all the conditions.
Where does one stop: time, temperature, equipment, lighting, table size (which by known facts, 626 was on what appears to be harder table), clothing...etc.
Then, expand your premise to something like Motorsports...duplication of conditions can't possibly be a requirement.
Don’t forget gravitational changes over time and location. That could make a difference on a run ending hanger.
Bob Beamon, 1968.:wink:Don’t forget gravitational changes over time and location. That could make a difference on a run ending hanger.
Bob Beamon, 1968.:wink:
And the large audience Mosconi had at his exhibition made it easier for him because the toroidal distribution of mass around the table caused the object balls to accelerate towards the pockets.
Bonus points: who can explain why this gravitational effect is true in two dimensions but not in three dimensions? (The interior of a spherical shell has no such acceleration away from the center.)
Bob Beamon, 1968.:wink:
And the large audience Mosconi had at his exhibition made it easier for him because the toroidal distribution of mass around the table caused the object balls to accelerate towards the pockets.
Bonus points: who can explain why this gravitational effect is true in two dimensions but not in three dimensions? (The interior of a spherical shell has no such acceleration away from the center.)
Not one of the nine signatures of JS626 can give a full accounting of the run from start to finish! Not one. This pig in a poke will not fly. Spread some real light on the subject, if you can.
I keep reading though this long-ass thread to see if anything of significance is ever posted and I haven't found anything yet.
FWIW, WGAF if he ran 626 or 969?
I DON'T.
I'm just one of the people who will still say, "he didn't beat Mosconi's 526 under the same set of circumstances and using the same type of equipment."
He may have ran 626 and that is fine with me. Good job. I have no problem crediting him with running 626, but I don't consider it to be breaking Mosconi's record. It is a "different" record under different conditions.
There's already been more sh*t spread here than anyone can shake a stick at. I heard another writer claim that he was in a sh*thole up to his knees, head first. Just keep piling it on.