Dave, in all seriousness here. Would you please point out some of his valid points? As, I, and many others, just do not see them.
This is why I state that- He claims words such as logical, critical thinking, rational, reasonable, ect. Yet, his posts actually contain none of the above. It is not rational, nor logical or reasonable to go on for years to make the claims he has. His claims are not based on fact, but on only opinion.
He refuses to accept the proper definition of the word objective, because it does not suit his agenda. He has even stated that. The word has several meanings, and he will only accept any definition that suits him.
He claims as fact that the system is not objective, yet he can not even describe properly the steps to use the system. He has not taken the system to the table to study it intensely so as to rationally be able to dissect it with critical thinking. So, again, all he has in his opinion based on very little actual fact.
He claims that we use subjective subconscious adjustments to make the system work. Yet, not once has he been able to offer any proof of us doing so. Which critical thinking and logic and reasonableness would demand of him to do. He claims we don't have the proper intelligence to even know what we are doing, but he does have that intelligence without even knowing how to properly utilize the system as stated on the DVD that he claims he refused to watch all of.
So, again, what are the valid points you are saying that he is making? Many of us would really like to know.