Would you want that to include BCA points, which determines most of our Mosconi Cup team?
Yes, those are the ranking points we are talking about.
Would you want that to include BCA points, which determines most of our Mosconi Cup team?
I am in the same boat you are.
I would prefer the event stay at the original 16 due to the dimished return for 2-1 but also for the minimal difference at the top for 1st and 2nd comparatively.
That is another factor I had not even thought of although I think he will still get enough regardless.
I'm talking about ranking points for the world and USA rankings. This has nothing to do with the Master Of The Table awards.
There has been so much interest in this year's Fatboy Ten Ball, Greg and I are seriously considering expanding the field to 32 players. I have ten already on a waiting list. I wouldn't do this if I didn't think we could get a full field of 32. If we fall short, I will go back to the first sixteen players. I don't want any byes! I know this may mess up the calcutta in the action room, but they can always pay off based on who goes the farthest.
This would mean an extra $8,000 in the purse and we would now pay eight sports, instead of four. Two wins to get in the money. So for all you guys out there who are interested in playing or backing someone contact me immediately! jayhelfert@yahoo.com or (310)370-3994 H. (310)710-6250 C.
glad you greg decided this...not that i count for shit
Expanding this tournament to 32 is a mistake in my opinion.
I think the problem is some of the top players slept this year and didn't sign up in time. Now they want a shot to get in, perhaps they should sign up for the event the year before to make sure that they don't miss out.
I enjoy this even (at 16) but it definitely cuts down on the action for the top players. I believe this should be an invitational event with alternates if they don't pay in time. If it isn't an invitational make it at least 1K to get in, 2K would be better as it would keep out the dead money.
The greatest thing about watching the matches previously was there were no bad matches, the best players in the world matched up in a small big money tournament that paid great!
Eric had a great idea with the initial concept and I can't believe this was considered without even asking him.
Expanding this tournament to 32 is a mistake in my opinion.
I think the problem is some of the top players slept this year and didn't sign up in time. Now they want a shot to get in, perhaps they should sign up for the event the year before to make sure that they don't miss out.
I enjoy this even (at 16) but it definitely cuts down on the action for the top players. I believe this should be an invitational event with alternates if they don't pay in time. If it isn't an invitational make it at least 1K to get in, 2K would be better as it would keep out the dead money.
The greatest thing about watching the matches previously was there were no bad matches, the best players in the world matched up in a small big money tournament that paid great!
Eric had a great idea with the initial concept and I can't believe this was considered without even asking him.
Your name is getting stolen also!!!!
Your nice little idea is turning into I don't know what?
Maybe YOU should extend invites on who plays.....but why should you have input?.....oh, you started it and put money in...hmmmmm.
I'm with ya pimp!
so with the points system and all is this a seeded tourney?