That puts it in a nutshell for me. Thanks, Jay.
I was there. When Shane passed the shot back to Mike I heard someone say "Boy, that was smart." And I admit I had to agree ... at the time. The first thing I thought of was a final table at a poker tournament and the short stack is forced to go all in. The other two players just call and check it down to get him eliminated.
But, no, this isn't poker. So I guess that's an unfair comparison. But how can you tell if someone is making an honest effort on a ball anyway? Okay, yes, it was pretty obvious.
I asked the TD if Shane did anything against the rules. The answer was no. Some people thought maybe Orcullo should have called the TD over to ref right after it happened, but I don't think anything would have changed.
I have to say, I absolutely loved the tournament. It helped that a local favorite was still in it to the end. I'm not so sure I would have stayed there until 3:30 AM to watch if Banks wasn't still in it.
All-in-all, I'd be happy to watch it all over again, even with the controversial ending. The ring-game format made for a much more exciting tournament to watch. Seeing someone like Parica and Matlock actually blast into balls was unique.
It doesn't help that a big-name player was going around saying he thought everyone should leave and not watch the finals because the tournament was crap. Kinda childish.
Oh, and one more thing... It was also said (early at the tournament) that this format favors Banks style since he's a free-wheeler. Just another little note for those who complained later about him sh*tting balls in all over the place.
Just my thoughts.