> There are circles within the pool community where a player,regardless of how strong they might be,could be referred to,or flat-out called a nit for simply choosing to NOT GAMBLE.
Even though Mike Massey did his share of road work back in the day,his religious convictions now forbid it.
You'd be surprised at the number of fairly strong players that are like that.
I don't know why,but Ralf Souquet is said to not gamble on himself. Would I if I played his speed,sure I would,but unless he's playing one of the other top 25 players,that's not gambling,that's STEALING.
There is a damn strong player from up around Bowling Green,Ky named Eddie Adams. His top gear is about like Rudolfo Luat's every day speed,more than enough to give him a legit shot to beat anyone that breathes air in a given tournament match.
He won't play for money,buy himself in the calcutta,sidebet,or even take jelly if you bought him and he wins. It's either based on religion,or some other deep conviction,and I respect him for it. Mike Massey is the exact same.
The difference between guys like that and a true nit is they aren't WOOFING at everyone in the room,and then choosing not to play. They aren't talking shit like "bet you won't play me even" after losing to you,and then wanting to play a race to 7 for 10 bucks.
Or,maybe they don't have the same amount of disposable income as others. I fall into that category myself at the moment. If I had say 2000 a month I could just set on fire and not worry about it,like some here,if not more,other than the obvious champions that post here,NO ONE that comes here is barred. I believe in myself that much.
With that being said,I can't afford to play more than the occasional 50 dollar set now and then,so I don't,and have had to turn down games I could grind out into a 1000 dollar score several times,because I simply didn't have the cash to start.
I'm not out woofing at people either. Tommy D.