Pool "Secrets" Found on AZ

Anybody can just say stuff. You have to back it up.



"People will generally accept facts as truth only if the facts agree with what they already believe."

Andy Rooney

No argument there.. But i can say what i think is right and debate for sake of good; i would love to be convinced; but so far i am siding with myself! hay! for a change!
 
The "level cue stick" makes this correct....using inside I'd elevate to cut the ball as severely as possible.

Your experiments did not lead you to the truth. With inside english it's hard to tell whether there is throw or not. With outside english the only way you can cut the ball more than 90 degrees (with a level cue stick) is with throw. It is possible to cut the object ball more than 90 degrees.

The other way to look at this is if the object ball acquires spin then it must also be thrown. The two necessarily go together in a fixed ratio. Conversely, if a ball is thrown, it will have side spin. That's from relatively simple physics.
 
Anybody can just say stuff. You have to back it up.



"People will generally accept facts as truth only if the facts agree with what they already believe."

Andy Rooney

The same principle applies to just rejecting "stuff", only proof makes it valid.

It will still be denied by many for a myriad of reasons, few rational.

J
 
The same principle applies to just rejecting "stuff", only proof makes it valid.

It will still be denied by many for a myriad of reasons, few rational.

J

You mean like Evolution vs. Creation? It never ceases to amaze me the level of stupidity in this country. Of course we know that the rest of the world is even worse. Some consolation!
 
Thin cuts will spin the object ball on very thin cut, but will not throw it.
If the OB picks up sidespin from the CB, it is because there is a sideways force between the CB and OB. This is the same force that causes throw. See Diagram 1 in the following article for an illustration:

"Throw - Part VIII: spin transfer" (BD, March, 2007)

For more info on this topic, including video demonstrations, shot examples, and physics-based proofs, see the spin transfer resource page.

I hope that helps convince you.

Also, see the plot and try the experiment in the following article: "Throw - Part II: results" (BD, September, 2006). There is throw even with thin cuts close to 90 degrees; although, the throw is less at faster speeds.

Regards,
Dave
 
Last edited:
You mean like Evolution vs. Creation? It never ceases to amaze me the level of stupidity in this country. Of course we know that the rest of the world is even worse. Some consolation!

Saw an interesting bumper sticker once that may have answered that age old question, it read: "Thank God For Evolution". :smile:

J
 
"Nietzsche is dead" - GOD

Yes, you'll not see one that says "Thank Evolution for God".

godnietzschesl-1.jpg



Saw an interesting bumper sticker once that may have answered that age old question, it read: "Thank God For Evolution". :smile:

J
 
FYI, a better version, with narration, can be found at the 1:09 point in:

NV B.92 - "Impossible" cut shots, from VEPS V

Enjoy,
Dave

Dr. Dave when you shot the impossible cut shot, the 11 ball, i slowed down the video speed, and noticed that the 11 ball did not spin left or right it rolled to the pocket; and that agrees with the fact you did not stun it and hit hard so no collision induced throw and no spin induced throw. The shot i am talking about at about 1.52, note the white stripe it did not go side way! is this wrong observation or right? i did noticed a lot of side spin for the stun with english shots on other vids..Again thank you for all your time.
 
"Anything that is asserted without evidence, can also be dismissed without evidence" That is a Christopher Hitchens quote (from memory). It is true most of the time but not if taken to its logical extreme. Generally, if you make a claim the burden of proof is on you. So, if you claim that a ball is thrown on a cut shot without english being transferred (an extraordinary claim) without any evidence to back it up, anyone that has any knowledge of the existing evidence can dismiss it out of hand. This is because it goes against all the evidence we allready have and also against physics knowledge.

The same goes for balls being cut thinner with inside english than outside with the same contact point and angle of attack. It is hogwash that goes against all our physics knowledge and can be dismissed by anyone.

Yes, of course it can....and an unsupported dismissal should be given credibility and respect approximately equal to that given to the original unsupported assertion.... that is, little, if any, dependent mainly upon the knowledge and reputation of the parties involved.

I wasn't arguing the transfer of english issue in my prior post, I was simply addressing the irony of someone making this statement....
Anybody can just say stuff. You have to back it up
....without "backing it up". An unsupported assertion and/or dismissal will always rightfully be given less credibility than one supported by fact and reason. J

disagreement-hierarchy.jpg
 
Saw an interesting bumper sticker once that may have answered that age old question, it read: "Thank God For Evolution". :smile:

J

I love it! My favorite was "Shoot Pool, Not People." Too bad no one paid attention. :frown:
 
If you think outside english doesn't help you cut a ball thinner, then try Vern Elliot's
'impossible bank' with INSIDE english.....you will find that it's truly impossible.

One of the most difficult things is to convince a pool player that he is wrong, there is pride involved here i know. But from my 35 years experience shooting, with only thing on my mind "consistency", i find out hitting the thin cut with outside helps a lot due to the swerve of CB not english induced throw.

I am not saying you are wrong, because no one can convince someone that he or she is wrong until they find out by themselves. Until that time enjoy pool, and please when you get unexpected result from a pool shot in a game or a match question it, and try again and again, write it down for next practice..Try snooker! that will show you how bad a pool stroke is yet still makes balls in pool.
 
Last edited:
One of the most difficult things is to convince a pool player that he is wrong, there is pride involved here i know. But from my 35 years experience shooting, with only thing on my mind "consistency", i find out hitting the thin cut with outside helps a lot due to the swerve of CB not english induced throw.

I am not saying you are wrong, because no one can convince someone that he or she is wrong until they find out by themselves. Until that time enjoy pool, and please when you get unexpected result from a pool shot in a game or a match question it, and try again and again, write it down for next practice..Try snooker! that will show you how bad a pool stroke is yet still makes balls in pool.

So, did you try the 'impossible bank' with inside english yet?

As to snooker, you're talking to a guy with a lot more snooker experience,
on everything from carom cloth to 42 ounce.

As to pride, google 'projection' as a psychology term.

Don't get me wrong, I'm enjoying your contributions to AZ.....
...a similar argument like this started about 100 years ago at
English Billiards....some fine players would have agreed with you...
....but they were wrong.
 
If you guys want to see famous pool-related quotes, see:

Top 100 Pool and Billiards Maxims, Sayings, and Quotes

If you just want "secrets," see:

Top 100 Pool and Billiards Tips, "Secrets," and "Gems"
I didn't see the references to the authors of those sayings and tips. Where are they listed on the web site?
I wrote or paraphrased most of those from memory. Some were from similar past AZB threads. I also made up some of them (e.g., "Don't put too much American on the ball." and "Let one finger stay and the other will point the way."). Many are famous quotes from famous people (e.g., Benjamin Franklin, Yogi Berra, Edison, Einstein, etc.). When I can find some time, I will try to research these and list the original authors (and make sure the quotes are correct, and not just paraphrased).

I doubt most of the pool-advice quotes can be attributed to any one individual with an original published source, but I will try to research these also. Many are just obvious things that different people paraphrase in different ways and aren't attributed to any one person. For example, do you think I could find original sources for:

"It's not the cue. It's you,"
"Don't use more power than you can control."
"Draw for show, follow for dough."
"There's nothing worse than good position if you miss the shot."
"Don't try to get perfect shape when good shape will do."
"Playing a tough shot is better than playing a tough safety."
"If you can't find the one being hustled in the pool room, it's you."
"There's always a shot ... you just have to find it."
"Don't try to run out unless you can."
"Think long, think wrong."
"Stroke it, don't poke it."
"Let your cue do the work."
etc.!

Regards,
Dave
 
Last edited:
So, did you try the 'impossible bank' with inside english yet?

As to snooker, you're talking to a guy with a lot more snooker experience,
on everything from carom cloth to 42 ounce.

As to pride, google 'projection' as a psychology term.

Don't get me wrong, I'm enjoying your contributions to AZ.....
...a similar argument like this started about 100 years ago at
English Billiards....some fine players would have agreed with you...
....but they were wrong.

You the man. Thanks, but you trying to drive me crazy!! 'impossible bank' with inside english common!! i thought we are buddies!
I was able to make it with outside, but had to cheat!! once you apply the cheat you make it every time:bash:
 
Back
Top