Did I read correctly that he wants people to sign an NDA for the info?
Are you kidding me?
Can you imagine someone signing that and telling others about the system and having this guy go to a lawyer screaming about how he taught someone how to pot a ball and they told everyone how I do it! He would literally be laughed out of the law office, NDA or not.
That said, I'm always open minded.
Is this a pivot system... a fractional system of some kind? Give us a high level idea. Heck, even CTE threads had the basics: align, offset, pivot, whack it.
What are the bullet points for this system?
If you can't answer that and it's hush, hush, hush without NDA NDA NDA.... screw this nonsense. The odds of a true amateur coming up with a method that isn't a subset of some kind of what has already been discussed at length on here is almost zero.
Not impossible... just near zero.
Ive done a quick review after signing an NDA. A review was promised, so this is my preliminary.
My biggest message: I wish the initiator had spent time here. His manual might have been cleaner and been met with less scrutiny. As it stands, it's a self-taught instructional with some unique additons to some of the very oldest of the discussed English compensation methods we've had. I think because newbies come on the forum where things like CTE and 90/90 are discussed, that they might not know of what was discussed before that, and what was before that, and so on, and so on. This isn't CTE or 90/90, but it for sure is not new.
But, if you want a different take on a method that works, his method will work. There are a few clarifications I think are needed for stroke, setup, and Physics, so I don't think the current version is ready for prime time. But newer forum members and those who might not know some of the older methods that have been discussed prior to the wave of aiming systems and the wave of low deflection cues might want some refresher as well as a different, maybe more in depth study on the older concepts.
Btw, I teach (or discuss with potential students) this method among other systems and methods. The OP has a unique spin, but I and others on this board have already discussed everything thus far that I've read on his manual to my students. However, as I'm bound by an NDA, I won't disclose exactly what it is, but I also want it on record that I and plenty of others have already discussed this method and the nuances many times over the years. It would be impossible to get sued for IP infraction, based on what I've read so far.
And to the OP, I can make your method stronger or at least give you my spin on the method. I've already done the leg work a decade ago. It'd be much more fun to discuss it openly on the aiming forum.
Freddie <~~~ calling my lawyer