Those tables probably don't even burn right. Don't give that "blue lable is better" bs. either. They bank short. The only reason the 3 railer to the corner banks even close to right, is that the shortness of the 3 rail makes up for the shortness of the other two! Somehow this cobbles together a somewhat decent ending point for a 3 rail bank. Two railers are still WAY off. I can't even count the number of shots that just don't work anymore! You can't strech out the angle with outside anymore, you can't kill the ball properly with inside, either. Every shot that touches the rail gets chucked out like vegetables out of a fat womans mouth!
It's Brunswicks fault. If they hadn't pulled out of pool, maybe we'd have some proper tables to play on. But no, all we have now is short banking shit and Chinese garbage, none of which can stand up to the playability of a GC. If all you care about is a table holding level for a long time, then Diamond and Rasson are ok tables. If you care AT ALL about proper banking tracks, pockets that play right and rail geometry, then you're shit out of luck with those two. Now Rasson is going for the Eurotour...I mean, I didn't exactly love the Dynamic tables. There was some nonsense going on with the pocket facings, and the build quality was questionable , but at least it played somewhat like a pool table.
GC have a lot of issues, especially hacked up ones, but they don't detract from the game. Diamonds changed the game, for the worse.
