If people ONLY read ALL the previous threads then they wouldnt post what they would post becasue then they would realize that when I put in aiming that it was AN EXAMPLE.....unless all you guys who are posting similar stuff are just messing with me so that I get frustrated and post over and over agaion that ITS NOT JUST AIMING THAT IT SPANS ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING......Lol....k THAT'S the last time I repeat myself...." Sigh "
Actually, that was YOUR OWN FAULT, Pat. Step away from the situation, and look at it from a different angle. You *know* aiming system topics are "hard-wired" to go south, no matter how politely and civilly the OPs try to "frame" them. You
know this.
Yet, you write, and I quote:
This thread MAY catch some heat [...]
[...] about how Hal Houle's claims of Pros using this method and the reason they do not admit it to any of us is because WE the " regular " pool player are seen as the enemy.
[...]...how do I know?? Because I was instructed not to reveal anything that was to taught me as well from ALL of them..........In the words of my greatest teacher thus far after he taught me THE aiming system and how easy it was to pocket ANYTHING after he taught me....." It's like stealing aint it?! ".....My reply...." Just a look of astonishment back at him "....He just smiled back.
While I get your superficial point about the aiming system scenario "being only an example," you ARE alluding to, or demonstrating, the following:
1. That a particular aiming system is a secretive society (via the Hal Houle quote), and that because you took some instruction, you are now part of the secret society;
2. That you "possess" knowledge of "THE" (notice the use of caps) aiming system (implying it's the panacea -- the only one that matters) that is so perfect, that you can make "ANYTHING" (notice the use of caps) on the table -- to the point of "stealing." And, via that paragraph's opening sentence, you were instructed not to reveal anything. Sort of an Eddie Murphy-esque "I have some ice cream... wanna lick? PSYCHE!!" nyeh-nyeh statement.
You don't think the combination of these two obvious points is going to reignite some aiming system fires? Sorry to call you out, but your "woes of having your 'example' being misunderstood" are hollow, Pat.
-Sean