A lot of assumptions are being made in this mess. I'd love to hear from this "helper."
Lacking that first-hand account, why does everybody here seem so ready to believe that this underling took it upon himself or herself to do something so drastic? What would this person's motivation be? Calcutta maybe, but would that really be worth it? Odds of winning dough vs. the odds of being discovered doing the dirty deed seems like a bad bet to me.
Frankie, despite all that's been said about him, at least laid out a possible rationale for why this was done. Perhaps it was self-serving or paranoid ... I don't know him, but I can't help but think of this helper as a kind of Scooter Libby, taking the fall. Maybe that's what Frankie was so pissed about ... his perceived shifting of the blame and the failure of the TD to own up to what really happened.
Lacking that first-hand account, why does everybody here seem so ready to believe that this underling took it upon himself or herself to do something so drastic? What would this person's motivation be? Calcutta maybe, but would that really be worth it? Odds of winning dough vs. the odds of being discovered doing the dirty deed seems like a bad bet to me.
Frankie, despite all that's been said about him, at least laid out a possible rationale for why this was done. Perhaps it was self-serving or paranoid ... I don't know him, but I can't help but think of this helper as a kind of Scooter Libby, taking the fall. Maybe that's what Frankie was so pissed about ... his perceived shifting of the blame and the failure of the TD to own up to what really happened.