Joe T
Well-known member
How would you play this ball in hand runout? I know it's simple I would just like to see some different opinions.
Joe T said:How would you play this ball in hand runout? I know it's simple I would just like to see some different opinions.
[...]
cubc said:Tates first version is the only other way i would play the 7 because it gives the same % margin of error of getting on the 8. Generally its slightly riskier going that route than the way i listed (for me personally) but still around the same % error of shape which is good.
cubc said:
edit: if it didnt roll far enough getting on the 8 i would just use a smooth top english shot and come up the center of the table since the 9 is so close to the pocket. but i would ideally be going for the pattern shown.
Steve Lipsky said:That 7 is just in a really awkward position where none of the more natural paths are laying right. The 7 is a bit too high to play it comfortably in the upper left and come 3 rails down to the 8. And I definitely don't like playing the 7 in either of the pockets on the right side of the screen.
I think the real problem here is that none of the positional routes can adequately guarantee that you don't get straight on the 8, which is the cardinal sin of this out.
So I agree with cubc's choice, but I'm not going to love it. I'm going to focus on this shot and give it the attention it deserves.
- Steve
P.S. Move the 7 just two inches "down" (towards the left of the screen), and my answer instantly changes to playing it in the upper left pocket and coming three rails with low left english. The draw lets you come short to the third rail, which guarantees the not-getting-straight-on-the-8 part. Where the 7 is laying now, though, you really can't use low left to do this because you might scratch in the lower right pocket.
Great shot Joe!
ScottW said:I'd play the 7 ball straight into the top-right corner pocket (down above the 8), with some top so the cue follows the 7 downtable a ways. That way, you've got the angle on the 8 to sink it and come back for the 9.
cubc said:
edit: if it didnt roll far enough getting on the 8 i would just use a smooth top english shot and come up the center of the table since the 9 is so close to the pocket. but i would ideally be going for the pattern shown.
I agree the 8 to the 9 is easy. However, I think whether you draw back and go 3 rails or go 1 rail depends a lot on where you end up with whitey after pocketing the 7. If the cueball doesn't make it past the headstring, then I think the drawing it back is a lot riskier.cubc said:That was the exact same thought process I had. The 7 was too high to risk going 3 rails to get down to the 8. Move it closer and the 3 rail shape is a given.
I still like going from the 8 to the 9 by drawing back because im not fond of shooting off the rail or possibly scratching coming straight up the table from the 8. Either way the 8 to the 9 isnt even a tester.
I'm getting "Beta Version Expired" and a blank table -- no balls or lines. Others are having the same problem.Joe T said:How would you play this ball in hand runout? I know it's simple I would just like to see some different opinions.
... EMPTY TABLE SHOWN
mosconiac said:I play it like RiverCity & Patrick.
Simple draw off the 7 and straight up the table off the 8. You will maintain a cut angle on the 8 and won't accidentally freeze the CB to the side rail coming off the 7.
A simple cut on the 8 carries you right down table to the 9...easy to judge.