Streaming Players & Problems

Kid Dynomite

Dennis (Michael) Wilson
Silver Member
I can see two very top action players getting a cut of the stream, but not tournaments. I do think that some of the streams are pricing themselves out. JMO. Johnnyt
Why do you think or feel this way???

Compared to movie ticket prices
Compared to concert tickets
Compared to sport event tickets
Compared to theater tickets

Only thing cheaper is TV. Plus, TV is that big cable bill every month!

I buy streams all the time because I enjoy them. I am selective because some matches are boring and un-educational. I am not learning from it.

Kd

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

Johnnyt

Burn all jump cues
Silver Member
Why do you think or feel this way???

Compared to movie ticket prices
Compared to concert tickets
Compared to sport event tickets
Compared to theater tickets

Only thing cheaper is TV. Plus, TV is that big cable bill every month!

I buy streams all the time because I enjoy them. I am selective because some matches are boring and un-educational. I am not learning from it.

Kd

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

I said JMO, and you have yours.
I don't buy theater, sports or concert tickets...and buy movie tickets less than 6 times a year. I don't play anymore, so no need to buy PPV just to learn. Johnnyt
 

jay helfert

Shoot Pool, not people
Gold Member
Silver Member
I handle streaming and don't do all the work that Desiree and Oscar do with running events but I can tell you for the hours put in they don't make a fortune and it probably equates to minimum wage. I do know behind the scenes stuff and you have lots of things happening before, during and after an event with countless people involved.

A promoter has to work the deal with host rooms/casino to get some added money, then work deals with sponsors and then satisfy the sponsor with value to keep them. You have to promote on social media and get the word out which is hours of time before the event. You have to setup and are the first one there and last one out the door. You have to deal with complaints from players and you will get cry babies in every tournament.

You have to deal with your travel cost and players looking for perks to come play the event whether its free rooms, entries, food/drink and so on. Depending on the scale like say CSI and Derby you are talking all the vendors you have to deal with, room kickback percentages, tournament director, referees, a crew like BadBoys to set up and tear down who do a great job. You have your media such as photographers and live streaming.

You have lots of money going out and risk so you should have some reward. If I have $20,000 in cost upfront monies and I make a few thousand I deserve it for the risk I took just like the players who risk there money to travel and play. The players don't always win the money and take a loss and sometimes promoters do too.

I know I am leaving much out which others can add to who have done stuff so maybe Mark Griffin, Ozzy, Greg Sullivan, Oscar and Desiree or Jay Helfert can chime in but trust me the good promoters out there and people who run tours earn the little money they might make in proportion to the scale of the work in an event for pros.

The amateur side of it all is what truly makes money and if the pros all stopped playing the recreational guys out there playing leagues and in the poolrooms would just continue on. I would like to see the pros make big dollars but the money just isn't there and with pool it might never be.

My suggestion to some players is to clean up their act and get together so they can put on their own events, control the video content. Random drug testing for stuff other then marijuana and don't dress like slobs. I think if you are a professional then dress the part, it doesn't have to be a suit but a nice collared shirts and pants (not jeans) with shoes would be nice or maybe go the golf look which is a mix of sport and dress.

Well enough rambling out of me for now. Time to get out and play some pool.

Very interesting thread that caught my attention. Thanks to Lenny for kicking this one off with a detailed explanation of what goes into streaming an event. In the above post he goes into some of the details of putting together a tournament and what a promoter must do to pull off a successful one. It is for all these reasons that I have no desire to put together any more major tournaments - to much work for too little return, with a lot of grief thrown in for good measure.

Let's be honest here, we are all involved (in one way or another) in what is still considered a minor sport, so minor that most mainstream media does not see fit to cover it in any way. It doesn't matter that many millions play pool on a regular basis both here and abroad. Only in China (and to a lesser degree in the Philippines), where it is not such a minor sport, are pool players given any real recognition, and the compensation that goes with it. Did you know that the top Asian women players are making a healthy six figures a year, thanks to prize money, sponsorship and endorsements!

We all labor over how that equation can be changed and so far have not found the answer. There is yet to be a fairy Godmother fall out of the sky and rescue pool. It is what it is. Our television coverage in the USA has shrunk to near zero, with only an isolated event being shown once or twice a year. Without streaming and Youtube airings of international tournaments (China) few people would know that professional pool even exists!

Simply put, Pool needs streaming and the players need it even more. The more the better! Video streaming came along just in time to save our sport from extinction. It is a growing avenue for sponsors to show their products and get exposure to a much larger audience that is not available any other way. The billiard media reaches far less people and is predominately aimed at those who already are entrenched in our sport. Streaming and the resulting coverage, as Lenny so eloquently explained, is a way for people outside the billiard mainstream to get a glimpse at what makes our sport special.

The argument put forth by a player for direct compensation reminds me of a terrible debacle that derailed our sport some thirty odd years ago. A wonderful promoter (and player) named Richie Florence had managed to get Budweiser and Caesars World to co-sponsor major pool tournaments in the early 1980's. These were all $100,000 plus events, good prize money for the time, actually greater than what pro bowlers were making then. Earl won $33,000 plus a $15,000 car in 1982 at Caesars Tahoe. All of Richie's events were being televised on ESPN with feature coverage of the final three matches. After several successful tournaments and a chance for expansion into more markets, his tour arrived at Caesars Palace in 1984. I was the tournament director. This was also a 100K+ event that Earl won, this time getting a mere $25,000. He beat Terry Bell (the APA founder) in the finals, after beating Dallas West for the hot seat. Terry then beat Dallas in the losers bracket final to get his chance at Earl. All these matches were taped for later television viewing. But then something funny happened. The players refused to sign the releases for the shows to be aired on TV. They wanted a cut of the television revenue! They were especially peeved that most of these shows were being aired repeatedly in reruns. Bad decision! They had gotten some very bad advice from a few people that had a hidden agenda, which I will not elaborate on now as it is not germane to this conversation.

I called a friend of mine, a man named Jim Davis, while all this was going to ask his advice. Jim was an award winning television director, who had directed shows like the Ed Sullivan show, Bob Hope specials, the Oscars several times, etc. He explained to me that athletes in other major sports did not get a direct payment/piece of any television revenue. What they got was EXPOSURE! And lots of it. Jim told me that's what made them into sports STARS, the more frequent the exposure the better. He went on to add that the pool players should be grateful for all the reruns each show gets. Better for them and their careers to be seen by as many people as possible. Unfortunately the players didn't heed my warning and never signed the releases. The Caesars Palace event never aired on ESPN and Richie Florence was finished as a promoter. Maybe somewhere there is a lesson to be learned by the present day pool players hoping to make a living from this sport. I hope so for their sake.
 
Last edited:

POVPOOL

POV Pool
Silver Member
Simply put, Pool needs streaming and the players need it even more. The more the better! Video streaming came along just in time to save our sport from extinction. It is a growing avenue for sponsors to show their products and get exposure to a much larger audience that is not available any other way. The billiard media reaches far less people and is predominately aimed at those who already are entrenched in our sport. Streaming and the resulting coverage, as Lenny so eloquently explained, is a way for people outside the billiard mainstream to get a glimpse at what makes our sport special.

The argument put forth by a player for direct compensation reminds me of a terrible debacle that derailed our sport some thirty odd years ago. A wonderful promoter (and player) named Richie Florence had managed to get Budweiser and Caesars World to co-sponsor major pool tournaments in the early 1980's. These were all $100,000 plus events, good prize money for the time, actually greater than what pro bowlers were making then. Earl won $33,000 plus a $15,000 car in 1982 at Caesars Tahoe. All of Richie's events were being televised on ESPN with feature coverage of the final three matches. After several successful tournaments and a chance for expansion into more markets, his tour arrived at Caesars Palace in 1984. I was the tournament director. This was also a 100K+ event that Earl won, this time getting a mere $25,000. He beat Terry Bell (the APA founder) in the finals, after beating Dallas West for the hot seat. Terry then beat Dallas in the losers bracket final to get his chance at Earl. All these matches were taped for later television viewing. But then something funny happened. The players refused to sign the releases for the shows to be aired on TV. They wanted a cut of the television revenue! They were especially peeved that most of these shows were being aired repeatedly in reruns. Bad decision! They had gotten some very bad advice from a few people that had a hidden agenda, which I will not elaborate on now as it is not germane to this conversation.

I called a friend of mine, a man named Jim Davis, while all this was going to ask his advice. Jim was an award winning television director, who had directed shows like the Ed Sullivan show, Bob Hope specials, the Oscars several times, etc. He explained to me that athletes in other major sports did not get a direct payment/piece of any television revenue. What they got was EXPOSURE! And lots of it. Jim explained to me that's what made them into sports STARS, the more frequent the exposure the better. He went on to add that the pool players should be grateful for all the reruns each show gets. Better for them and their careers to be seen by as many people as possible. Unfortunately the players didn't heed my warning and never signed the releases. The Caesars Palace event never aired on ESPN and Richie Florence was finished as a promoter. Maybe somewhere there is a lesson to be learned by the present day pool players hoping to make a living from this sport. I hope so for their sake.

Thank You, Jay Helfert! Thank You, Lenny.
 

POVPOOL

POV Pool
Silver Member
American Billiard Radio

I just got off the phone after a rather lengthy interview on this subject with American Billiard Radio that will air this evening.

I actually suggested that Mark Cantrill interview Lenny before me, but Mark said that he already had Lenny on last week to discuss the Wyoming Open event. Sheesh, it's not like you don't have to hear Mark every week....LOL.

Anyway, I hope I haven't pissed too many people off or forgotten to make enough pertinent points, but that's how live radio goes. It's also taken a little time for me to have some clarity on the subject, since information is coming in so quickly and there's a lot of different points of view.

Should be up around 9pm/PST
www.AmericanBilliardRadio.com
 

Tronpocket

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I dont have PayPal or a account i can use to buy live streams..(cash is king).....but rest asured.....if i ever get to personally meet lenny ,jcin or any of the other serious streamers that have given me hundreds of hrs watching free matches.....dinner ,drinks and party favors are on me.

I hope i get to honor that promise. (Ill be at the expo fri and sat night btw)

Thank you guys.
 

david(tx)

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
This is interesting for sure and I was just speaking to a pro player (not Shane Winters) two nights ago about streaming and his view on how it hurts the players and how they are owed. I explained I am contracted by the promoter who pays me up front to do an event. He uses my stream and the number of viewers as a way to get more sponsor money which equals more added money for the players and exposure for the event.

Without a stream some sponsors won't take part because its almost expected for any halfway decent event so promoters use it as part of there pitch since hanging a banner up at a venue isn't going to cut it anymore. He then inquired about YouTube and all the views on videos of him and that he should be owed money.

I explained majority of videos I upload have background music from it being done in pool rooms which triggers copyrights from music companies and they don't make money for whomever uploads them which for me is 90% of my videos I would say. So with say for example 1.5 million views and says 150,000 views being monetized I made around $150 total in all those years from that since you earn about $1000 for a million views.

I think players should contact YouTube and ask how much money there name has made on the videos and they might be shocked its very little. I am asked to put these videos online after I stream them from the event promoter, I would prefer to just hand the footage over and let them do it because that is a bunch of work within itself so some do. From now on I think every tournament should make players sign a release for that event and that the added money is the compensation for using the players image.

Ustream pays nothing to streamers for viewer numbers. Now when guys are doing a PPV then players should get paid like TAR did for them in the past. When it is a PPV tournament then the players need to be explained to that the added money is the players pay because maybe some of the added money is recouped from the PPV but I don't know as I have never done one. Streamers who do PPV for a tournament usually cut a deal with the promoter and whack up the monies so the promoter can recoup some of the added money.

I have streamed thousands of hours of pool and much of it with no compensation and just laying out money every two years for equipment which thankfully in the past people contributed to. Now I generate some revenue which I take some of that money and upgrade after about 2 years or so. If an event for example pays me $500 for a weekend event and I spend 30 hours streaming and 10 hours before and after with promotion and other stuff we are at 50 hours so $12.50 an hour but you have a day of travel before and after the event so your wage would become even lower as more time is invested. You also need to minus monies for the equipment fund which will come fast when you need to upgrade stuff.

When players played on ESPN like other athletes they don't get paid money for it, they either get money from their sponsors, a salary from a team or in the case of pool the added money from the event sponsors which the promoter obtained. Some are baffled that ESPN charges pool to film it, well they do this because they need to make money for the production. If they could obtain TV sponsors who want to advertise the event they would do so to make the money but pool doesn't draw big viewers so no big money from advertising. ESPN probably pays to do certain events because they can get big money from advertising.

I don't see promoters or streamers or players getting rich at all because its pool and there is no money and might never be any real big money in it. The fact is I never started streaming because of money or thoughts there would be big money in it but really because I love the game and I know there were others who did also who wanted to watch.

The players and fans should be thankful for streamers and the legit promoters and sponsors in the game because pool just isn't a big draw. I appreciate the players talent because I like pool but we are a small minority who gives a damn about it. I have had some players shake my hand and appreciated I was there to give them coverage because not only does the event need it for the sponsors of the event but players do also so they can showcase the sponsors they have by being seen.

If any player who is playing on the stream wants me to mention their sponsor and even put up a banner on the stream at some point during their match just ask and I will do that no problem. I am proud to help the events, promoters, players, fans and the game. My biggest pay comes in the form of all the people I have met players and fans alike, experiences and memories I will cherish.

I have streamed thousands of hours of pool and much of it with no compensation and just laying out money every two years for equipment which thankfully in the past people contributed to. Now I generate some revenue which I take some of that money and upgrade after about 2 years or so. If an event for example pays me $500 for a weekend event and I spend 30 hours streaming and 10 hours before and after with promotion and other stuff we are at 50 hours so $12.50 an hour but you have a day of travel before and after the event so your wage would become even lower as more time is invested. You also need to minus monies for the equipment fund which will come fast when you need to upgrade stuff.

Just curious , all streamers operate under this promoter/streamer arrangement ? What about room owner/streamer business dealings . I thought some streamers solicit sponsors on their own and use those funds for themselves and may not charge the room owner for streaming so that he can earn money this way and from PPV.
 

Fast Lenny

Faster Than You...
Silver Member
I have streamed thousands of hours of pool and much of it with no compensation and just laying out money every two years for equipment which thankfully in the past people contributed to. Now I generate some revenue which I take some of that money and upgrade after about 2 years or so. If an event for example pays me $500 for a weekend event and I spend 30 hours streaming and 10 hours before and after with promotion and other stuff we are at 50 hours so $12.50 an hour but you have a day of travel before and after the event so your wage would become even lower as more time is invested. You also need to minus monies for the equipment fund which will come fast when you need to upgrade stuff.

Just curious , all streamers operate under this promoter/streamer arrangement ? What about room owner/streamer business dealings . I thought some streamers solicit sponsors on their own and use those funds for themselves and may not charge the room owner for streaming so that he can earn money this way and from PPV.

Not all do work under that arrangement. The sponsor arrangement might work for some too if they get enough sponsors a good one. I believe with the PPV the room owner might get a piece of it. I have stream sponsors and contributors in the past who have helped with cost of equipment, travel and other things when an event didn't have the budget for me but I still wanted to do it. Mainly for me it is on the promoter to pay my cost which usually if the event is a good event they can obtain the monies from sponsors they gain from having a live stream plus they want the matches recorded and put online to get the event more exposure.

If the event is big enough with enough big names maybe a room owner wouldn't have to pay for a streamer because the streamer could get his end from sponsorship monies but from my experience its not a good way to go about it. Most sponsors with the big money will sponsor the event as a whole and then the promoter makes you a part of the package. Streaming makes the package more attractive and is a good selling point. Most sponsors expect coverage of the event or will likely not be a part of it unlike in the past.

I believe we can't go backwards and if events weren't streamed you could read about the results as opposed to seeing them live and look at pictures of the event and maybe see a banner hanging on a wall or sponsors would be mentioned in an article. Free streaming is the best thing for sponsors in pool IMO and exposure for an event, PPV limits the audience but for certain events I believe it works fine.

I was not always open minded about the PPV side in the past but believe for big tournament events free is the way to go and for the invitational smaller fields then PPV is the way. I just like more people having eyes on our game, the players and the events along with those sponsors who support it.
 
Last edited:

Fast Lenny

Faster Than You...
Silver Member
Very interesting thread that caught my attention. Thanks to Lenny for kicking this one off with a detailed explanation of what goes into streaming an event. In the above post he goes into some of the details of putting together a tournament and what a promoter must do to pull off a successful one. It is for all these reasons that I have no desire to put together any more major tournaments - to much work for too little return, with a lot of grief thrown in for good measure.

Let's be honest here, we are all involved (in one way or another) in what is still considered a minor sport, so minor that most mainstream media does not see fit to cover it in any way. It doesn't matter that many millions play pool on a regular basis both here and abroad. Only in China (and to a lesser degree in the Philippines), where it is not such a minor sport, are pool players given any real recognition, and the compensation that goes with it. Did you know that the top Asian women players are making a healthy six figures a year, thanks to prize money, sponsorship and endorsements!

We all labor over how that equation can be changed and so far have not found the answer. There is yet to be a fairy Godmother fall out of the sky and rescue pool. It is what it is. Our television coverage in the USA has shrunk to near zero, with only an isolated event being shown once or twice a year. Without streaming and Youtube airings of international tournaments (China) few people would know that professional pool even exists!

Simply put, Pool needs streaming and the players need it even more. The more the better! Video streaming came along just in time to save our sport from extinction. It is a growing avenue for sponsors to show their products and get exposure to a much larger audience that is not available any other way. The billiard media reaches far less people and is predominately aimed at those who already are entrenched in our sport. Streaming and the resulting coverage, as Lenny so eloquently explained, is a way for people outside the billiard mainstream to get a glimpse at what makes our sport special.

The argument put forth by a player for direct compensation reminds me of a terrible debacle that derailed our sport some thirty odd years ago. A wonderful promoter (and player) named Richie Florence had managed to get Budweiser and Caesars World to co-sponsor major pool tournaments in the early 1980's. These were all $100,000 plus events, good prize money for the time, actually greater than what pro bowlers were making then. Earl won $33,000 plus a $15,000 car in 1982 at Caesars Tahoe. All of Richie's events were being televised on ESPN with feature coverage of the final three matches. After several successful tournaments and a chance for expansion into more markets, his tour arrived at Caesars Palace in 1984. I was the tournament director. This was also a 100K+ event that Earl won, this time getting a mere $25,000. He beat Terry Bell (the APA founder) in the finals, after beating Dallas West for the hot seat. Terry then beat Dallas in the losers bracket final to get his chance at Earl. All these matches were taped for later television viewing. But then something funny happened. The players refused to sign the releases for the shows to be aired on TV. They wanted a cut of the television revenue! They were especially peeved that most of these shows were being aired repeatedly in reruns. Bad decision! They had gotten some very bad advice from a few people that had a hidden agenda, which I will not elaborate on now as it is not germane to this conversation.

I called a friend of mine, a man named Jim Davis, while all this was going to ask his advice. Jim was an award winning television director, who had directed shows like the Ed Sullivan show, Bob Hope specials, the Oscars several times, etc. He explained to me that athletes in other major sports did not get a direct payment/piece of any television revenue. What they got was EXPOSURE! And lots of it. Jim told me that's what made them into sports STARS, the more frequent the exposure the better. He went on to add that the pool players should be grateful for all the reruns each show gets. Better for them and their careers to be seen by as many people as possible. Unfortunately the players didn't heed my warning and never signed the releases. The Caesars Palace event never aired on ESPN and Richie Florence was finished as a promoter. Maybe somewhere there is a lesson to be learned by the present day pool players hoping to make a living from this sport. I hope so for their sake.

Sometimes the players can be there own worse enemy and not see the big picture. Thanks for taking the time to write this as its enlightening and like you said maybe they will learn from the past mistakes and realize that streaming is the only real coverage they are getting that is live and drawing an audience.

I believe players and streamers should work together better including myself. From now on if a player has sponsors and comes to me during there match to promote them on the stream I am willing to do that letting viewers know the players cue, case, chalk or whatever sponsor they have on air. Maybe a pitch is to get X amount of money from their sponsor if they get on the stream or make it to a hot seat or finals match.
 

david(tx)

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
That arrangement works too. I believe with the PPV the room owner might get a piece of it. I have stream sponsors and contributors who help with cost of equipment, travel and other things. Mainly for me it is on the promoter to pay my cost which usually if the event is a good event they can obtain the monies from sponsors they gain from having a live stream.

If the event is big enough with enough big names maybe a room owner wouldn't have to pay for a streamer because the streamer could get his end from sponsorship monies but from my experience its not a good way to go about it. Most sponsors with the big money will sponsor the event as a whole and then the promoter makes you a part of the package. Streaming makes the package more attractive and is a good selling point. Most sponsors expect coverage of the event or will likely not be a part of it unlike in the past.

I believe we can't go backwards and if events weren't streamed you could read about the results as opposed to seeing them live and look at pictures of the event and maybe see a banner hanging on a wall or sponsors would be mentioned in an article. Free streaming is the best thing for sponsors in pool IMO and exposure for an event, PPV limits the audience but for certain events I believe it works fine.

I was not always open minded about the PPV side in the past but believe for big tournament events free is the way to go and for the invitational smaller fields then PPV is the way. I just like more people having eyes on our game, the players and the events along with those sponsors who support it.

Thx for the reply. In lean times such as now i think the players deserve some kind of compensation if they appear on the stream , a free meal , or a night at a hotel , especially if the streamer is charging to see the tape of the matches , either online or selling dvd's.
 

Fast Lenny

Faster Than You...
Silver Member
Thx for the reply. In lean times such as now i think the players deserve some kind of compensation if they appear on the stream , a free meal , or a night at a hotel , especially if the streamer is charging to see the tape of the matches , either online or selling dvd's.

For me my streams are always free for people to watch online and no charge to watch it after the fact. I used to do the DVD thing of matches alittle bit offering a handful and they were time consuming and didn't generate enough sales to be bothered with it so I don't waste my time.

I think the players if they could be in control of all the content somehow could have an online billiard channel that was a membership site where all streamers uploaded content to it so it would be a good value for members. Most of us put the content on YouTube for people to watch for free so the value of pool matches is not there and has changed since there is so much free content.

I know the viewers love the free stuff but some of the players do not because they don't want to be devalued so to say. I just know that streaming brings the players and events exposure, money added coming from sponsors. Players need to be savvy enough to go the sponsors they have or new ones and get money and say you only need to pay me if I get on the stream or pay me more if I get on the stream and get your name showcased or mentioned. I had Mike Massey ask me this past week to mention Meucci cues and his Sure Stroke Tool and I did happily even putting up the Meucci logo and his Sure Stroke Tools website and image. I will do this for any players who comes to me and wants when they are playing a match and don't expect anything as I want to help players.

I am there to do a job for the promoter who gets the money together for the players, I provide a service putting the sponsors on the streams and capturing the matches for them to be put online and get more exposure for the event and sponsors. I am not much different then a photographer who might be paid or sponsored to go to an event and take photos so those photos can be added to writeups giving exposure to the event.

Streamers and photographers who are paid to be there by an event who wants the coverage don't owe the players because we are capturing their image, the event already pays the added money out to the players. It would be like a O'Dell going to the photographer who took the picture of the catch and saying he wants to be compensated, it doesn't work that way. I think to solve the problem all players will be signing contracts with an entry so employees like myself and other streamers and photographers are protected since we are just there doing a gig.
 
Last edited:

watchez

What time is it?
Silver Member
Who is Shane Winters to think he should get a cut of PPV. Is he even relevant in the pool world. When has he ever done anything of significance on a 9' table. To me players like sky, Bergman, Dechaine, SVB, and the caliber of those guys should be getting the stream money not some short stop. I don't think people would care if Shane winters doesn't show up for a tourney. One less punk to worry about

He just won the Amateur event at the SBE
 

rhinobywilhite

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Lifes not fair!

Would you rather have players fighting to be on stream or fighting to stay off?

When players make it to the finals they will be on stream. When they start making it to the finals consistently they will want to be seen earlier in ghe tournament also. Or if a player starts to develop fans that ask for his matches, it effects his pocketbook directly.

Using your argument, "Life's not fair", perhaps Shane should quit griping, realize there are a number of players who perform at or above his level and play or withdraw from streamed tournaments.

Sponsors make choices about supporting players based on the player's exposure and talent. No exposure, few offers from sponsors.
 

cajunfats

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Without Organization,Players Have No Legitimacy.

When Pool Players have an organization that supports their work as an Entertainer,i.e. Screen Actors Guild/American Federation of Radio and Television Artists and a structure of Producers(On the Rail, PoolActionTV,etc.) with Directors(Lenny,Ray Hansen,etc.) that work systematically together,then you will see the possibility for rewards all the way through.

Forget the ridiculous notion of Pool Players as Athletes. As Jay Helfert said,think Celebrity.Exposure is what makes Stars.

Actors receive residual checks for movies they were in years ago when they are aired for use by commercial enterprises(Netflix,Hulu,Red Box,Cable/Sat.. It took years to get there, but ask any Actor who gets that check what it took as a non residual Background Actor.

Right now, there is no leg to stand on.You would think the players at all of these events and EXPO's would get together and collaborate about such a possibility?

Do not look to the Billiard Industry for any solutions. You will have to drag them kicking and screaming to such a successful idea. They will come,only because they will make money doing it.

I watched some of Lenny's Stream from Arizona this weekend. Thank You for doing the work that made it possible.
 

Bossman225

Registered
I heard the name before but really only started hearing a buzz about him after he sent Robb Saez to the hospital. :sorry:
He's a really good player from new york. He's in about his early 30's, he's Hispanic I believe. I've met him a few times when I lived in florida. He's a very soft spoken guy

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using AzBilliards Forums mobile app
 
Top