Apologies to the Dr. Originally My intention was to point out an inaccuracie. I have always found Value in your contributions to the sport. While off-topic does take fork in the topic, it does keep the thread at the top.
With that said I shall trundle along the off topic trail.
Just took a little time to revisit the Experiments in looking at the cue ball while delivering the stroke thread. Well looking now for the link to the Ronnie interview. On page 5 of 41 and still looking but in the search I uncovered this statement.

With that said I shall trundle along the off topic trail.

Just took a little time to revisit the Experiments in looking at the cue ball while delivering the stroke thread. Well looking now for the link to the Ronnie interview. On page 5 of 41 and still looking but in the search I uncovered this statement.
on page 5 Greg said:I have been lining up the shot, getting into my stance with the shot aligned and then confirming my aim by sighting down my cue through the cue ball and to my intended contact point on the object ball. When I am stroking my cue in the practice stroke my eyes remain on the cue ball so I do not accidently bump it. When the practice stroke stops I follow the line of the cue and stroke and confirm that it will take the cueball to it's target(the tiney little fly speck on the OB). If all is well I focus on the exact point I wish to contact the cueball and the line through it to the target. My primary focus is keeping the cue on that line. When the cue strike the ball my eyes then go with the cueball, reading the spin/speed and then the contact with the object ball.
It was a leap of faith at first but so far well worth the exploration. Until I started this experiment I always shifted my gaze from the cueball to the object ball at the back of my stroke, giving a slight pause at that point like Buddy Hall.