This Sunday at 10am (MST) Scott Frost will be Answering Questions Live

Fast Lenny

Faster Than You...
Silver Member
Ship it Mike, no live stream tomorrow, apology accepted for calling me a hot head when I am as cool as summer breeze. I spoke with Scott and told him I thought it might be a bad idea, we spoke on it for awhile and he agreed. He said to everyone as much as he would like to answer your questions and tell what happened it wont change much of anything really, it probably will only hurt him instead of help him and due to some legal stuff its just best not to.

I am going to stop wasting my time on here with this stuff, its not what pool is all about. Thanks to those who can sift through the smoke screen of BS and see what really went down and to those who can't see the forest for the trees it is either an easy or a tough life like that.
 
Last edited:
and by the way...

Scott giving his side of events is long overdue, IMHO.

All the talk on here questioning his past character (e.g. alleged woman beating, alcoholism, degenerate gambling) to my mind bears little to no relevance on whether or not Scott, in fact, received payment from Dippy, so I hope that sort of thing will be excluded.

Looking forward to the Q & A session.

Will we see Scott on a webcam or will it be dialog only?

Best,
Brian kc
 
i will try and be on and will be happy to moderate for you. My pimp hand is Strong.
 
get Cocobollocowboy to moderate. I think he would be a fitting ringmaster..
He's gotta have tough skin. And he doesn't like Scott or Dippy Dave, so he's neutral.
 
I like the website, Fast Lenny. I wonder how many will tune in. :D

Ironically, I have a sneaky suspicion that the viewer count will be a whole lot more for this than a pool match. :o

And I think it's a GREAT IDEA! :wink:
 
I like the website, Fast Lenny. I wonder how many will tune in. :D

Ironically, I have a sneaky suspicion that the viewer count will be a whole lot more for this than a pool match. :o

And I think it's a GREAT IDEA! :wink:
Thanks everyone and if people have questions Scott will answer them on camera, I do not think it will just be voice. If it is out of line and is not about what I mentioned in the OP then we will not entertain it and remove along with banning so walk carefully. I will not let a bunch of heartless chumps who would not say stuff to his face be disrespectful.
 
Well I spoke with Scott and he has finally got on here and seen most of the BS, he will answer your questions live on my site at www.ontherailtv.com on Sunday at 10am for about a half hour or so. The questions have to be pertaining to the match with him and Dippy, the 50k and the truck. If we deem your question out of line we will not answer them and they will be removed and so will you if you act like a fool. I will need a few mods to help me out also, so any volunteers post here please.

Scott wants to do this to give his side and give you all the little facts of what happened because there are some things that have not been posted on here. I personally do not appreciate the fact that Scott has been slandered and accused of all types of stuff on here and neither does he. It is easier for him to do this then to come and reply to all the nonsense on here and how things have been twisted and confusion caused here, plus his user name has yet to be approved. So tune in on Sunday morning and we will set the record straight hopefully for most of you non believers.

I'm not going to miss this - to heck with the British Open.

To save everyone the trouble of looking it up, Mountain Standard Time is the same as Pacific Daylight Time. They are on the same time right now as the West Coast.

Chris
 
I'll tune in when I get home from golfing with my son.

Major beatdown coming my way there !
Son plays good.
 
Would asking for a detailed blow by blow recap of what happened during the Samoan scene be okay?
 
Lenny, I will miss this due to a golf tourney. Will this be archived so that we can watch it afterwards? Looking forward to it.
 
Very interesting that Scott has had the opportunity to read over what everyone else has said and go over all the details, before he chimes in to presents his case.

Having that material as a reference to potentially go over and prepare with, i would think there is almost no possibility of catching him off guard, if it would be that case, that he could have been caught off guard to begin with.

Kind of seems like an advantage.
 
Very interesting that Scott has had the opportunity to read over what everyone else has said and go over all the details, before he chimes in to presents his case.

Having that material as a reference to potentially go over and prepare with, i would think there is almost no possibility of catching him off guard, if it would be that case, that he could have been caught off guard to begin with.

Kind of seems like an advantage.

Like Dippy did not have the opportunity to answer his questions and prepare for them? I mean Scott could come on here and reply like Dippy did but this is much better then that IMO, he did not read everything, he does not really know how to navigate around here. He read Scott vs Dippy and that was pretty much it as far as I know, he did not read my original thread or Billy's, he does not even know how to find it or get to it, this is all foreign to him.

He signed up for a user name that has not been approved yet so he cant post and he is frustrated so we talked and it will be easier just to answer peoples questions on a live feed. If this whole situation interest you then appreciate it, if not then keep it moving. Peoples questions will be fairly new to him, the answers will be the same as mine and Billy's most likely as those are the facts and what happened.

I do not get how people online like to run off with things and make them something they are not. People will say Scott is this and that and he got the money and blew it and he was playing $5000 a roll dice, and on and on, its kind of funny really how twisted it is, maybe he gave it to Mike Tyson.
 
Very interesting that Scott has had the opportunity to read over what everyone else has said and go over all the details, before he chimes in to presents his case.

Having that material as a reference to potentially go over and prepare with, i would think there is almost no possibility of catching him off guard, if it would be that case, that he could have been caught off guard to begin with.

Kind of seems like an advantage.

FWIW, I think that Scott will be at more of a disadvantage than Dippy in that Dippy got to choose which posts he would respond to and he also took whatever time he felt he needed to ponder them, then answer.

Scott, on the other hand, will be answering real time and won't have any chance for choosing which questions he will answer and, finally, if he is on camera, and I sure hope he will be, we'll be able to see his facial expressions and body language.

Someone pointed out way back in one of the threads that there's no need to take a lie detector test since there are plenty of skilled 'lie detectors' right here on AzB. I concur.

Stay tuned!

Best,
Brian kc
 
Last edited:
Thanks everyone and if people have questions Scott will answer them on camera, I do not think it will just be voice. If it is out of line and is not about what I mentioned in the OP then we will not entertain it and remove along with banning so walk carefully. I will not let a bunch of heartless chumps who would not say stuff to his face be disrespectful.

So, lets see if I have this right Lenny. Your house, your rules, to some degree prepared questions and answers, and if anyone asks a question you don't like or makes a comment you don't like their banned.

Does that kind of sum it up?

Steven
 
So, lets see if I have this right Lenny. Your house, your rules, to some degree prepared questions and answers, and if anyone asks a question you don't like or makes a comment you don't like their banned.

Does that kind of sum it up?

Steven

Your damn right Steve. If someone comes on there and wants to ask him something out of line it will not be answered, I just ask people to be respectful and ask decent questions pertaining to what happened and not getting into things that do not matter is all. I think in this day and age with the internet and being anonymous people have 0 respect and feel they can say whatever, it wont be tolerated. I will be asking the questions that are on the screen so it wont be picking and choosing really just not answering questions that are idiotic like whether he likes chocolate or vanilla ice cream.

If people do not like it then do not come and hear what Scott has to say, people can keep running on and on with the BS on here that is getting twisted and is kind of a joke really. If you guys are really interested in what is going on here then appreciate the fact that its being done, do not act like this is owed to you because in reality its not.
 
FWIW, I think that Scott will be at more of a disadvantage than Dippy in that Dippy got to choose which posts he would respond to and he also took whatever time he felt he needed to ponder them, then answer.

Best,
Brian kc

A different but valid point of view.

Much in the same way that only certain questions will be answered, while others that are deemed inappropriate will be ignored and/or removed.

No big deal.

I don't really care either way who did or didn't do what.

Just vocalizing a thought.
 
A different but valid point of view.

Much in the same way that only certain questions will be answered, while others that are deemed inappropriate will be ignored and/or removed.

No big deal.

I don't really care either way who did or didn't do what.

Just vocalizing a thought.

Do you think asking Scott about stuff outside of this incident like people talking about him being this or that is appropriate? IMO it is not along with some of the other stuff I have seen on here so those questions will not be answered but many things will be addressed and some new stuff that has not been posted on here obviously will be spoken about. It would be like a Q & A with Earl where some classless POS ask him if he likes to smoke pot, its just stupid, there comes a line you should respect and not cross.
 
Talking about this on a webcast, recorded, without an attorney present, is a bad idea for Scott.
 
Talking about this on a webcast, recorded, without an attorney present, is a bad idea for Scott.

We spoke about it and it will just be the facts as they happened, certain things will not be talked about and along with certain things that are evidence to his case. I do think it should show a good deal of what really happened. IMO I doubt this will go further then Scott getting his 10k back from Dippy for the truck, the 50k is probably a lost cause but who knows, if someone has some proof of Dippy stiffing Scott then that might just change. :)
 
Back
Top