Pool's demographic isn't worth catering to.
I agree with that, but I don't think that would make such a difference in the world of PPV pool. Look, I boast one of the largest collections of videos/dvds of pool matches, well over 1100. I watch them religiously. But to be frank. It is kinda boring. Rarely can I finish an entire match in one sitting. It usually takes me 2 nights to watch one race to 11.
While I want Shane and Dennis to duke it out to a race to 100 and watch it over a 3 week period I don't want to watch it 3 nights in row on a stream. A 2 hour exciting event would have more appeal to me.
That guy in a pool room that doesn't know who Earl is will most likely find it booring too.
You're right. The viewer NEEDS to be VESTED in any live match. How does the viewer become vested?
JoeyA
U don't figure out how to do it..U wait for Tar to get a spark again in the future and come back..ha ha
One thing I noticed though is that with boxing and mms fights hbo and companies charge per tv or per person compacity to sell the pay per view to bars. They in turn charge each head the comes in..I have seen several pool halls that have got the pay per vies Tar feeds and had 10-20 ppl that come just to watch..I think if they wanna continue to see these things they should have each person pay like 5 a head that are interested in watching and send the money in..I'm just saying if u have like 30 pool halls across the u.s. that have an average of 15 ppl watching each event at 5 a piece that's another 2-3k per event..and I honestly think there is more than that..I think if pool halls were contacted this could be done..Maybe not cause ppl are cheap but that's 5 a head to watch a 30$ package..seems fair to me..
I also think this is a good idea. If I had a poolhall, we would show all the matches and build it up. The ones I frequent don't seem to care about the streams...
I used to take my computer to the pool room and the owner and I would split the cost of whatever match was on.
I thought a lot of people would want to watch and it would be more enjoyable to
watch with others. How wrong I was even on the nights with many league players there.
They would pass by and not even stop to glance at a pool match on the big screen TV.
Most of the time it would just be me watching, sometimes one or two others.
Finally I just didn't bother anymore.
TAR tried to push this around the time they got the studio. They even gave a free PPV to pool rooms around the country one time in hopes that the next one, they would buy it. But the next time, all the pool rooms just asked for another free ride and didn't buy. Sad.
I don't know how you deal with all the geniuses out there (some were even an auditor!!) who knows your business and industry (apparently WAY more than you or Mark Griffin) telling you what you shoulda coulda woulda ...
Bet.
.
.
.
I had the same experience, but at my house. I invited 5 of my pool-playing friends over for a deli dinner and Mosconi Cup youtubes on the big screen. We ate good food, drank beer and talked about all kinds of stuff.
They watched about two minutes of the match and then lost interest.
I think the pool hall idea is great.
[snip]
The point I'm trying to make is, due to the atmosphere at the pool hall and the others that was sweating the match, I decided to stay because others were also interested in watching, which is better than being home and watching by yourself.
I'm sure no one watches the Superbowl by themselves but rather in a large group. I think that's the key.
You're right. The viewer NEEDS to be VESTED in any live match. How does the viewer become vested?
One thing when people discuss TAR I wish they would keep in mind is that for the last five or so years everything you see comes from one person. Every graphic, every video file, any technical creation of any sort comes from one guy. That guy had to figure out to do all of that stuff on his own. He didn't already know how to do it.
It always kind of surprises me when people act like TAR is some operation with a lot of time, skill and resources that just doesnt get shit done because it's too dumb or lazy to think of it.
The devil is always in the details. I did DVD's for years. It didnt make any money after taking into account the time to make them, ship them, deal with returns/lost shipments/people who don't know their own address.
After years I finally found a VOD solution that makes financial sense. One provider I looked at thought it would be an awesome idea for me to pay them hundreds of dollars a month and split the revenue of any sales 60/40 with them. They get the 60. I'm not going to make a deal just to do something.
I am good at making shit happen. I suck at selling it. Mark is the same way. There are a lot things that could have been done better on my end. But at the end of the day when you have limited resources and are selling a product most people are not interested in it makes for a tough road.
All I needed to make TAR a success is 1000 people on earth to pay to watch the best players on earth. On two or three occasions out of thirty nine we got to half that number. AZ Forums has 47,000 registered members. If you can not get 2 percent of people who know enough about pool to sign up to AZ to buy something then that tells me people just are not interested in what you are selling.
The streamers that are out there now giving things away or trying to do cheap PPV's for mediocre matches are living off of other events they don't have to finance. They just show up and stream and if they can make a few hundred to get them to the next place they are happy. Thats fine if thats what they want to do. I was trying to do something different.