What speed,,

I think we are underestimating the top pros (SVB, Archer, Corey), and overestimating the amateurs.

Not the original question, but they could give an A player the 5 out and the breaks on a 9 footer, and I'd bet on them all day long. Bustamente gave a top open player in my area the 5 and breaks and beat him. I've heard of Santos giving all the top guys in NY (Hernandez) ridiculous weight and beating them.

On a 7 footer, I think a B will not win with the 7 and breaks. It would take an A player to win.

I actually think we as a community make the game all about the break, and figure if a player makes a ball on the break, he is going to win. If we had good statistics on this, and maybe we do somewhere, I hypothesize that it would be shown that LOTS of games are lost after the break on poor position control. A "B" player is going to mess up LOTS of position shots, even on a bar box.

The only statistic I remember hearing about the break is when Pat Flemming was doing the accu-stats (before videos), he actually discovered during PRO events the breaking player was more likely to lose the game they just broke rather than win it. Just food for thought on everyone putting all the emphasis on the break, and not the position play and other skill sets of the game.
 
youve got the breaks..lol....

Edited..... already covered....
 
Last edited:
The reason is that weight isn't much more than a confidence boost at that level...

I think we are underestimating the top pros (SVB, Archer, Corey), and overestimating the amateurs.

Not the original question, but they could give an A player the 5 out and the breaks on a 9 footer, and I'd bet on them all day long. Bustamente gave a top open player in my area the 5 and breaks and beat him. I've heard of Santos giving all the top guys in NY (Hernandez) ridiculous weight and beating them.

On a 7 footer, I think a B will not win with the 7 and breaks. It would take an A player to win.

I actually think we as a community make the game all about the break, and figure if a player makes a ball on the break, he is going to win. If we had good statistics on this, and maybe we do somewhere, I hypothesize that it would be shown that LOTS of games are lost after the break on poor position control. A "B" player is going to mess up LOTS of position shots, even on a bar box.

The only statistic I remember hearing about the break is when Pat Flemming was doing the accu-stats (before videos), he actually discovered during PRO events the breaking player was more likely to lose the game they just broke rather than win it. Just food for thought on everyone putting all the emphasis on the break, and not the position play and other skill sets of the game.


The reason they can give ridiculous weight and still win is that weight at that level is more of a confidence boost than anything.

How many times is an A player or better going to get to the six, seven or eight and miss the last couple of balls? 1 in 5 maybe??? does that make much of a difference, no not really.

So that would be like getting two on the wire in a race to ten.... The A player doesn't have much of a chance getting two on the wire from a top pro in a race to ten. There isn't as much separating them as some would believe, but the consistency of the top pro will win out in the end especially endurance wise.

The A player may win one or two sets, but in the end, the top pro will win out unless the a player has a tremendous break and gets the breaks as well.

Jaden
 
Last edited:
Why i posted this is i seen a unknown player that plays pretty tough some times plays a good pro with the 7 and break and drill the pro .The pro quite after 2 sets.Made me wonder was it because of the bar table or was
he just lucky or just how important the break is.Then i was wondering what
speed is the the unknown player.Pro only wins 4 out of 18 games....
 
Last edited:
How on earth is every mistake going to cost you more than one rack, if you've got the breaks???

Like most have said, it's going to depend on how well you break and whether or not you can control the rock.

Jaden

i already responded to that
 
I think we are underestimating the top pros (SVB, Archer, Corey), and overestimating the amateurs.

Not the original question, but they could give an A player the 5 out and the breaks on a 9 footer, and I'd bet on them all day long. Bustamente gave a top open player in my area the 5 and breaks and beat him. I've heard of Santos giving all the top guys in NY (Hernandez) ridiculous weight and beating them.

On a 7 footer, I think a B will not win with the 7 and breaks. It would take an A player to win.

I actually think we as a community make the game all about the break, and figure if a player makes a ball on the break, he is going to win. If we had good statistics on this, and maybe we do somewhere, I hypothesize that it would be shown that LOTS of games are lost after the break on poor position control. A "B" player is going to mess up LOTS of position shots, even on a bar box.

The only statistic I remember hearing about the break is when Pat Flemming was doing the accu-stats (before videos), he actually discovered during PRO events the breaking player was more likely to lose the game they just broke rather than win it. Just food for thought on everyone putting all the emphasis on the break, and not the position play and other skill sets of the game.


i think accu stats said that the breaker loses 60% of the time. i think i heard that once before
 
i think accu stats said that the breaker loses 60% of the time. i think i heard that once before

Bar box would be different, but I would like to think the person who makes a ball, and has control of the table would have the 60%. Also, breaks have become much more controlled, or manipulated, much more than days of old.
 
Bar box would be different, but I would like to think the person who makes a ball, and has control of the table would have the 60%. Also, breaks have become much more controlled, or manipulated, much more than days of old.

I agree Josh. That's a very old stat and doesn't apply to today. Johnnyt
 
I agree that's an old stat. But I think its applicable here because that stat came from the pro tour, with the best guys in the world. I know the break has matured quite a bit since the days of hit it as hard as you can and try to squat the rock.

The reason I think those stats are still valid on this topic is because we are talking about B players now. If a pro on the old stats was not a favorite to get out after the break (even an "old style" break), then I don't think a B player is a favorite to get out today even if he knows the break inside and out.
 
whups i completely forgot about that. i'm still thinking it's a bad game. i think i play decent bar box 9 ball (so far the most racks i've run on a valley is 7) and i wouldn't take that game for my dough

I think the most I have ran is 3 ......and I will take that spot from most anyone .....

of course I've got more heart and gamble than money ............................:wink:
 
Why doesn't everybody just go try it? Break open the rack; if you can run to the 7 more often than not running to the 7, then you win. Assume the pro never misses a shot.
 
This looks like a no brainer on a 7' Valley to me. OK which healthy "B+" player on here is going to step up and challenge SVB or someone close to his speed getting the 7 and the breaks? Johnnyt

I will play him or any of his peers a race to 21 like that for $500 in Vegas this year...
 
There's more to it than just that though. The breaker HAS to make a ball on the break more often than not. Then, he just has to be able to play a decent safe, he doesn't have to run out. Ever try and get safe on purpose from a kick on a bar table? It is low percentage. Which means, most of the time you have to kick at a ball, you will lose the game on a bar table. 9' table is a totaly different story.

I am a completely rookie at a bar table, don't know how to play on it or why there is such a difference compared to a 9'.

Why is it harder to kick and get successful on a bar table?
 
There's more to it than just that though. The breaker HAS to make a ball on the break more often than not. Then, he just has to be able to play a decent safe, he doesn't have to run out. Ever try and get safe on purpose from a kick on a bar table? It is low percentage. Which means, most of the time you have to kick at a ball, you will lose the game on a bar table. 9' table is a totaly different story.

You're right, a bar table is a different story. I don't know too many people who "try" to kick safe on a BB. The pro's I watch are kicking to pockets or two way shots and making a ton of them. There's really no such thing as a good safe on a BB.

In the end, it really comes down to your break. You'll have to be making balls and getting a shot at the 1 at least 50% of your breaks. If not, you can expect to lose that game against a top pro.
 
I haven't played on a valley barbox but once in the last ten years.

Even B players can make shots on a bar table that pros would play safe with on a 9' table. Basically, if it can be cut or banked, figure it is in the hole. The shorter distance really makes a difference. And, if you are on a Valley table, the pockets are about 5" and take almost anything near them. You can miss by a diamond and a half, and still have a chance of making it on a ball shot down the rail. Once the ball is between the points, 99.5% will fall in. Very seldom can you rattle a ball on a Valley table.

My bro was going to meet his wife to watch their league match and we hadn't played in a long time so we played some barbox nineball on a valley.

I BNR'd the first three racks, so we switched to altrnateing breaks and I think out of the ten or so games we played, we only actually played a game against each other once or twice.

I did play some barbox on diamonds up in Knoxville, Tennessee when I was there for some fun, and they were a little more respectable.

Jaden
 
Back
Top