Ok so last night I was playing my APA match and beat my opponent 3-1 in a race to 3. As I'm putting my cue in my case my team captain is talking to the other team captain and looking at me. I walk over to ask what's up and they tell me that since the other team put up their 7 early, they don't have a low enough SL to put up in the final match to comply with the 23 rule. Then they tell me the guy I just beat was actually a SL 2 even though he said he was a 4 (he was a new player but had played before) and asked if I would agree to play one more game against him as a 2, and me a 4 which would mean a hill/hill game. They said that would make it possible for them to play him twice and comply with the rule.
I told my captain that I would have to be an idiot to do so since I already won (playing him as a 4 like he claimed) and I would just be opening myself up to a loss. I told them it wasn't my fault that their team didn't plan correctly and I'm not the one to bail them out.
To make an already long story short...they called the LO and he allowed them to break the 23 rule by playing him again as a 4 in the final match. He beat another 4 on my team for the final match.
My question is what would you have done? Should I have played him in the hill/hill, or was I right to say no?
I told my captain that I would have to be an idiot to do so since I already won (playing him as a 4 like he claimed) and I would just be opening myself up to a loss. I told them it wasn't my fault that their team didn't plan correctly and I'm not the one to bail them out.
To make an already long story short...they called the LO and he allowed them to break the 23 rule by playing him again as a 4 in the final match. He beat another 4 on my team for the final match.
My question is what would you have done? Should I have played him in the hill/hill, or was I right to say no?