Why does it have be a game involving pockets? Have you watched any world-class level 3c lately? How could they not be considered world-class 'cueists'?Quinten Hann's ban ruined his career and he could have made this list (meanwhile Higgins received a slip on the wrist for his gambling debacle....(*shakes head*)
My list includes Efren, Earl, Ronnie, Judd
personally I exclude carom players, talent pool is just not large enough imo, should we ever have a chance to see one of the current top guys try their hands at pool or snooker I would reconsider
The current plan for the Olympic Games and what we will see in the Birmingham World Games next July is 3-cushion, snooker and men's and women's nine ball. That's the way it has been since the Akita World Games in 2001:... This is why I think if/when the Olympics get cue sports, they need to run three different events, snooker, 3C and probably 8 ball for the pool game. ...
The current plan for the Olympic Games and what we will see in the Birmingham World Games next July is 3-cushion, snooker and men's and women's nine ball. That's the way it has been since the Akita World Games in 2001:
Billiards Sports | IWGA
www.theworldgames.org
Results:
View attachment 616168
No. I don't think any competition with single players each playing multiple disciplines has ever been done. I don't count events like DCC and Johnston City. There have been a few like snooker/pool with two disciplines.Does anyone play in more than one event? ...
For those that haven't seen it, this was arguably the 3 cushion and pool GOATs of that time (Torbjorn Blomdahl and Efren Reyes) playing each other in their own respectively disciplines (9 ball and 3 cushion) in 1997 in or near their primes. Being such small sample sizes I don't think these and the other videos below prove much, but I think we can see to not underestimate those 3 cushion guys. Their game (3 cushion) may look deceptively simple but it is one of those cases where looks are deceiving and they clearly have as much talent as anybody.personally I exclude carom players, talent pool is just not large enough imo, should we ever have a chance to see one of the current top guys try their hands at pool or snooker I would reconsider
Thank you for not mentioning me, Stu.I don't see how one compares across the cue sport disciplines, and I'll restrict my comments to pool.
What constitutes a great cueist is a very interesting question. Is it somebody who has great power, great speed control, or is it the player having the most accurate delivery of the cue ball in the intended direction?
I recall discussing this with a couple of the old masters, specifically with respect to the stroke of Steve Mizerak, considered to have the greatest stroke ever in the eyes of some of his peers. Steve's stroke was less powerful than a couple of his peers (e.g., Earl Strickland), and his speed control was below a couple of his peers (e.g., Irving Crane), and there were a couple who shot straighter (e.g., Mike Sigel). That said, however, Jack Colavita suggested that Steve had the greatest blend of these three elements of any player he'd ever watched, making him the greatest cueist Jack had ever seen.
Using these criteria, I'd have to select Efren as the greatest living cueist, although Jose Parica is nearly Efren's equal, as are Mike Sigel and Buddy Hall. Among those who are still active, guys like Orcullo, Filler, SVB, and Pagulayan are all in the conversation.
The real answer, however, is that what constitutes a great cueist means different things to different people.
rafael was always entertaining to watch......The Miz was awesome. One of those guys whose stroke just looked smoother and straighter than anyone. Unfortunately, it seems like every time I watch one of his matches on youtube, he's having a bad day with tough rolls and facing Efren around '90 or Earl around '82 for Earl's first major win. To say Earl was on FIRE that day is an gross understatement. He had that crazy look in his eye, just unstoppable.
I don't think his career puts him among the very tip top but Rafael Martinez has a great stroke and makes some mind blowing shots. Probably more circus shots per game than anyone else I've seen. Amazing banks and kicks. Shots most people wouldn't ever think of. This shot at 12:20 is pretty spectacular
Back in 2010 Magoo's had a big 1p tournament, the 'T-town Classic' put on by G. Owen. RM was there and came in second to S. Ochoa. Rafael played some other-worldly shots including an insane 5-rail safety against Gabe.. Also saw him DESTROY Corey Duel in a late-nite big $$$ 10b game at DCC in '07. He plays all games, including 3c, very well. He's been in Mexico last few yrs due to some visa/passport issues.rafael was always entertaining to watch......![]()
I agree about the Miz...and I love Buddy’s stroke also.I don't see how one compares across the cue sport disciplines, and I'll restrict my comments to pool.
What constitutes a great cueist is a very interesting question. Is it somebody who has great power, great speed control, or is it the player having the most accurate delivery of the cue ball in the intended direction?
I recall discussing this with a couple of the old masters, specifically with respect to the stroke of Steve Mizerak, considered to have the greatest stroke ever in the eyes of some of his peers. Steve's stroke was less powerful than a couple of his peers (e.g., Earl Strickland), and his speed control was below a couple of his peers (e.g., Irving Crane), and there were a couple who shot straighter (e.g., Mike Sigel). That said, however, Jack Colavita suggested that Steve had the greatest blend of these three elements of any player he'd ever watched, making him the greatest cueist Jack had ever seen.
Using these criteria, I'd have to select Efren as the greatest living cueist, although Jose Parica is nearly Efren's equal, as are Mike Sigel and Buddy Hall. Among those who are still active, guys like Orcullo, Filler, SVB, and Pagulayan are all in the conversation.
The real answer, however, is that what constitutes a great cueist means different things to different people.
Ha! I’m a lefty that shoots both ways but shooting right handed it’s just to make the pot or ‘try’ to position the white. Ronnie put that white perfect on the black…couldn’t have been better if he picked it up and placed it.Same as above; if cueist refers to cue action, then it’s Ronnie or Murphy. Ronnie’s timing is ridiculous. Everything peaks at exactly the right moment, even when he’s using his left hand. The amount of work he gets on the cueball with minimal effort is a league above everyone else. And Murphy is called the man with a “Rolls Royce cue action” for a reason.
Ronnie playing a left-handed deep screw into the green pocket, between pink and black, to continue a 147 (I don’t have the words to express how ridiculous this shot is):
They run 600 of those little red balls yet?Currently, I believe the top snooker players are playing their game at high standard than anyone else. Impossible to measure and prove, but given how much money is in snooker, the amount of coaching and structure, it could be true. So my answer would be either Ronnie or Judd Trump.
I think this could change if pool saw a similar pro revolution just based on how many players there are world wide.