This is total crap! It shouldn't matter how many games you race to, a win is a win. Snooze you lose I always thought meant only for owing balls - if playing those rules, you would have to remind your opponent they owe a ball or they don't if you both remember after the fact.
One-pocket is the easiest of all the games to keep track of the score because of the shorter races and alternet breaks. If the same player is breaking that won the flip (or lag), the score is even (0-0; 1-1; 2-0; etc), if it's the other person, it's odds. I'll bet that the original breaker wasn't breaking during the 4th rack so it had to be 2-1 for someone. I have never heard of Snooze you lose for a game.
As I said, this is total crap and should never had taken place. If I were the tournament director I would have asked who broke and who won the flip - that would have told the story.
edit: sorry I just saw the posts above that basically said the same thing without the long wind : ).
Dave
One-pocket is the easiest of all the games to keep track of the score because of the shorter races and alternet breaks. If the same player is breaking that won the flip (or lag), the score is even (0-0; 1-1; 2-0; etc), if it's the other person, it's odds. I'll bet that the original breaker wasn't breaking during the 4th rack so it had to be 2-1 for someone. I have never heard of Snooze you lose for a game.
As I said, this is total crap and should never had taken place. If I were the tournament director I would have asked who broke and who won the flip - that would have told the story.
edit: sorry I just saw the posts above that basically said the same thing without the long wind : ).
Dave